Synthesis and properties of carbon–metal oxide nanomaterials

  • Anastasiya G. Navrotskaya
  • Elena F. Krivoshapkina
  • Igor A. Perovskiy
  • Yuri I. Bauman
  • Ilya V. Mishakov
  • Aleksey A. Vegyagin
  • Sergey I. Isaenko
  • Pavel V. KrivoshapkinEmail author
Original Paper: Sol-gel, hybrids and solution chemistries


In this paper, the sorption of the heavy metal ions (Sr2+, Ba2+, and Cs+) on the hybrid CNF/TiO2 and CNF/Fe2O3 materials is considered. The colloid–chemical properties of the TiO2 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles and carbon nanofibers in the dispersions were studied, and interaction between nanoparticles and nanofibers in accordance with the hetero-coagulation principle was estimated. The carbon nanofibers used were prepared by catalytic chemical vapor deposition of a propane–butane mixture over the nickel–copper catalyst and then functionalized by boiling in a mixture of concentrated hydrochloric and nitric acids. The TiO2 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles were synthesized via a sol–gel technique. The sol was mixed with carbon nanofibers. After drying, the hybrid materials with a uniform distribution of the oxide NPs along the nanofiber’s surface were obtained. The CNF-to-metal oxide ratios were 10:1 and 1:1. The samples were characterized by a set of physicochemical methods. The hybrid CNF/TiO2 system was found to have a synergetic effect toward the sorption of the metal ions from their aqueous solutions.


  • Hybrid materials CNF/Fe2O3 and CNF/TiO2 were synthesized by ex situ method.

  • The colloid–chemical properties of metal oxide NPs and CNFs in the dispersions were studied.

  • Metal oxide NPs are coaxially coated and uniformly distributed on the CNF surface.

  • Sorption of Sr2+, Ba2+, and Cs+ on the hybrid materials is considered.

  • The hybrid CNF/TiO2 was found to have a synergetic effect toward the sorption of Sr2+ and Cs+.


Carbon nanofibers Fe2O3 TiO2 Hybrids Extraction 



This research was supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-29-19053_mk).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Krivoshapkin PV, Mishakov IV, Vedyagin AA, Bauman YI, Krivoshapkina EF (2017) Synthesis and characterization of carbon/ceramic composite materials for environmental applications. Compos Commun 6:17–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shearer CJ, Cherevan A, Eder D (2014) Application and future challenges of functional nanocarbon hybrids. Adv Mater 26:2295–2318. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vilatela JJ, Eder D (2012) Nanocarbon composites and hybrids in sustainability: a review. ChemSusChem 5:456–478. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burakov AE, Galunin EV, Burakova IV, Kucherova AE, Agarwal S, Tkachev AG, Gupta VK (2018) Adsorption of heavy metals on conventional and nanostructured materials for wastewater treatment purposes: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148:702–712. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fan HT, Su ZJ, Fan XL, Guo MM, Wang J, Gao S, Sun T (2012) Sol–gel derived organic–inorganic hybrid sorbent for removal of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solution. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 64:418–426. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khalili SS, Dehghani H, Afrooz M (2018) New porphyrin-doped silica monolith: an effective adsorbent for heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 85:290–301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu X, Wang M, Zhang S, Pan B (2013) Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: a review. JES 25:1263–1280. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang J, Liu Y, You T (2010) Carbon nanofiber based electrochemical biosensors: a review. Anal Meth 3:202–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Postnov VN, Rodinkov OV, Moskvin LN, Novikov AG, Bugaichenko AS, Krokhina OA (2016) From carbon nanostructures to high-performance sorbents for chromatographic separation and preconcentration. Russ Chem Rev 85:115–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vamvakaki V, Tsagaraki K, Chaniotakis N (2006) Carbon nanofiber-based glucose biosensor. Anal Chem 15:5538–5542. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poveda RL, Gupta N (2016) Carbon nanofibers: structure and fabrication. Carbon Nanofiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rakov EG (2006) Nanotubes and fullerenes. Logos, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mishakov IV, Buyanov RA, Zaikovskii VI, Strel’tsov IA, Vedyagin AA (2008) Catalytic synthesis of nanosized feathery carbon structures via the carbide cycle mechanism. Kinet Catal 49:868–872. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mishakov IV, Bauman YI, Streltsov IA, Korneev DV, Vinokurova OB, Vedyagin AA (2016) The regularities of the formation of carbon nanostructures from hydrocarbons based on the composition of the reaction mixture. Resource-Efficient Technologies 2:61–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krasnikova IV, Mishakov IV, Bauman YI, Karnaukhov TM, Vedyagin AA (2017) Preparation of NiO-CuO-MgO fine powders by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis for carbon nanofibers synthesis. Chem Phys Lett 684:36–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012) Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. J Hazard Mat. 211–212:317–331. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Topel SD, Legaria EP, Tiseanu C, Rocha J, Nedelec JM, Kessler VG, Seisenbaeva GA (2014) Hybrid silica nanoparticles for sequestration and luminescence detection of trivalent rare-earth ions (Dy3+ and Nd3+) in solution. J Nanopart Res 16:2783. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ivanets AI, Srivastava V, Roshchina MY, Sillanpää M, Prozorovich VG, Pankov VV (2018) Magnesium ferrite nanoparticles as a magnetic sorbent for the removal of Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solution. Ceram Int 44:9097–9104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anastasova EI, Ivanovski V, Fakhardo AF, Lepeshkin AI, Omar S, Drozdov AS, Vinogradov VV (2017) A pure magnetite hydrogel: synthesis, properties and possible applications. Soft matter 13:8651–8660. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mikhaylov VI, Krivoshapkina EF, Trigub AL, Stalugin VV, Krivoshapkin PV (2018) Detection and adsorption of Cr (VI) ions by Mesoporous Fe-Alumina Films. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 6:9283–9292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zemskova LA (2009) Modified carbon fibers: sorbents, electrode materials, catalysts. Vestn LVO RAN 2:39–52Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strel’tsov IA, Vinokurova OB, Tokareva IV, Mishakov IV, Isupov VP, Shubin YV, Vedyagin AA (2014) Effect of the nature of a textural promoter on the catalytic properties of a nickel-copper catalyst for hydrocarbon processing in the production of carbon nanofibers. Catalysis in Industry 6:176–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khamova TV, Shilova OA, Golikova EV (2006) Investigation of the structuring in the Sol-Gel systems based on tetraethoxysilane. Glass Phys Chem 32:448–459. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohshima H, Healy TW, White LR (1982) Improvement on the Hogg—Healy—Fuerstenau formulas for the interaction of dissimilar double layers: I. Second and third approximations for moderate potentials. J Colloid Interface Sci 89:484–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X, Williams RA (1995) Particle deposition and aggregation: measurement, modelling and simulationButterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA, pp 443Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lu S, Pugh RJ, Forssberg KSE (2005) Interfacial separation of particles. Elsevier, Amsterdam, xii, 694. 22Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shi W, Li S, Chen B, Wang C, Sun W (2017) Effects of Fe2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles on 17β-estradiol adsorption to carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 326:1134–1144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, Burlington, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Chemistry of Federal Research Centre “Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”SyktyvkarRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Geology of Federal Research Centre “Komi Science Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”SyktyvkarRussia
  4. 4.Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations