Preparation and characterization of boron-based bioglass by sol−gel process
- 157 Downloads
45S5 bioglass has been widely studied in the last few decades because of its bioactivity and promising applications in the biomedical field. Boron, even few studied, represents a potential element to improve the properties of the 45S5 bioglass derivatives. The bioglasses are conventionally prepared by heat treatment of oxides and silicon. Here, the sol−gel method is proposed for the preparation of the boron-based 45S5 bioglass (45S5B) and the classical 45S5 bioglass (45S5), using water-soluble salts as raw materials. The bioglasses were characterized by FTIR, XRD, and SEM, indicating the success of the sol−gel method for preparation of the samples. The bioglasses were also tested in vitro for bioactivity in biological conditions and cytotoxicity against eukaryotic cells. The bioactivity of 45S5B was similar to the bioactivity of 45S5 bioglass, indicated by the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals at the surface of the pristine bioglasses. The results of cytotoxicity tests revealed that the IC50 of 45S5B (IC50 = 7.56 mg mL−1) was similar to the IC50 of 45S5 (IC50 = 8.15 mg mL−1), indicating its safety for application in the biomedical field.
The sol−gel process was used to prepare boron-based bioglass from water-soluble salts.
The bioactivity of the boron-based bioglass was similar to the conventional bioglass.
The boron-based bioglass and 45S5 bioglass showed high in vitro bioactivity.
The boron-based bioglass was not cytotoxic against OSTEO-1 eukaryotic cells.
KeywordsBoron 45S5 Bioglass Cytotoxicity in vitro OSTEO-1 cells
The authors acknowledge Capes for RGF doctoral fellowship, Fundação Nacional de Desenvolvimento do Ensino Superior Particular (FUNADESP), and University of Araraquara (UNIARA) for funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Lanza RP, Langer RS, Vacanti J (eds) In Principles of tissue engineering (2014), Elsevier, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- 5.Rodella LF, Favero G, Labanca M (2011) Biomaterials in maxillofacial surgery: Membranes and grafts. Int J Biomed Sci 7:81–88Google Scholar
- 9.Hench LL (2006) The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17:967–978Google Scholar
- 17.Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43:76–82Google Scholar
- 20.Bi L, Rahaman MN, Day DE, Brown Z, Samujh C, Liu X, Mohammadkhah A, Dusevich V, Eick JD, Bonewald LF (2013) Effect of bioactive borate glass microstructure on bone regeneration, angiogenesis, and hydroxyapatite conversion in a rat calvarial defect model. Acta Biomater 9:8015–8026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lin Y, Brown RF, Jung SB, Day DE (2014) Angiogenic effects of borate glass microfibers in a rodent model. J Biomed Mater Res—Part A 102:4491–4499Google Scholar
- 24.Shah FA, Czechowska J (2018) 9—Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In: Bioactive glasses, pp 201–233. Ed. Heimo Ylänen. Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier, second edition, Kidlington, UK, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100936-9.00011-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kamitsos EI (2003) Infrared studies of borate glasses. Phys Chem Glas—Eur J Glas Sci Technol Part B 44:79–87Google Scholar
- 31.Pham TTT, Nguyen TP, Pham TN, Vu TP, Tran DL, Thai H, Dinh TMT (2013) Impact of physical and chemical parameters on the hydroxyapatite nanopowder synthesized by chemical precipitation method Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:1–9Google Scholar