Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 236–248 | Cite as

Optimized mercapto-modified resorcinol formaldehyde xerogel for adsorption of lead and copper ions from aqueous solutions

  • Behzad Shiroud Heidari
  • Vajiheh-Sadat Cheraghchi
  • Siamak Motahari
  • Ghodratollah Hashemi Motlagh
  • Seyed Mohammad Davachi
Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for energy, environment and building applications
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

Resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) xerogel was modified by mercapto functional groups for removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions. The chemical structure of the mercapto-modified resorcinol formaldehyde xerogel (MRFX) was compared with the RF xerogel via Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), X-ray photoelectric spectroscopy (XPS), and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping to characterize the functional groups and their dispersion in the xerogel. The results showed that the MRFX included not only thiol groups, but also sulfonic groups with higher adsorption affinity sites. The functional groups were fully dispersed in the xerogel and made a homogeneous composition. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were also employed to show the effect of modifier on the phase structure of the xerogels. Moreover, the morphologies of the xerogels were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. According to the TEM micrographs, the MRFX included more nanopores than the unmodified xerogel. The MRFX was studied for adsorption tests. According to the results, the optimal pH to adsorb maximum Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions was 6. Adsorption kinetics study revealed that the adsorption process followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic equations and the adsorption equilibrium agreed much more with Langmuir rather than Freundlich model.

Resorcinol formaldehyde xerogel was modified by mercaptopropyl–trimethoxysilane during a sol–gel process. After the aging step, the wet gel was treated with pure acetone to exchange the pore liquid. As a result, the porosity of the xerogel was not terminated after drying. The xerogel was then used to adsorb Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions. According to the results, thiol and sulfonic groups were the major active sites with high adsorption affinities in the adsorption process.

Highlights

  • MRFX was used in the removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions.

  • MRFX included not only thiol groups, but also sulfonic groups with higher adsorption affinity sites.

  • Adsorption isotherms and kinetics were used to address the adsorption mechanism.

  • The adsorption capacities of Pb(II) and Cu(II) are 84 and 120 mg g−1, respectively.

Keywords

Sol–gel synthesis Heavy metal adsorption Xerogel Surface modification 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao J, Liu J, Li N, Wang W, Nan J, Zhao Z, Cui F (2016) Highly efficient removal of bivalent heavy metals from aqueous systems by magnetic porous Fe 3 O 4-MnO 2: adsorption behavior and process study. Chem Eng J 304:737–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Štandeker S, Veronovski A, Novak Z, Knez Ž (2011) Silica aerogels modified with mercapto functional groups used for Cu (II) and Hg (II) removal from aqueous solutions. Desalination 269(1):223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92(3):407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jal P, Patel S, Mishra B (2004) Chemical modification of silica surface by immobilization of functional groups for extractive concentration of metal ions. Talanta 62(5):1005–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu C, Bai R, San Ly Q (2008) Selective removal of copper and lead ions by diethylenetriamine-functionalized adsorbent: behaviors and mechanisms. Water Res 42(6):1511–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Javadian H, Taghavi M (2014) Application of novel polypyrrole/thiol-functionalized zeolite Beta/MCM-41 type mesoporous silica nanocomposite for adsorption of Hg 2 + from aqueous solution and industrial wastewater: kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Appl Surf Sci 289:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakami O, Zhang Y, Banks CJ (2012) Thiol-functionalised mesoporous silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles for high efficiency removal and recovery of Hg from water. Water Res 46(12):3913–3922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meena AK, Mishra G, Rai P, Rajagopal C, Nagar P (2005) Removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using carbon aerogel as an adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 122(1):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kadirvelu K, Goel J, Rajagopal C (2008) Sorption of lead, mercury and cadmium ions in multi-component system using carbon aerogel as adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 153(1):502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramadan H, Ghanem A, El-Rassy H (2010) Mercury removal from aqueous solutions using silica, polyacrylamide and hybrid silica–polyacrylamide aerogels. Chem Eng J 159(1):107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faghihian H, Nourmoradi H, Shokouhi M (2012) Performance of silica aerogels modified with amino functional groups in PB (II) and CD (II) removal from aqueous solutions. Pol J Chem Technol 14(1):50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maleki H (2016) Recent advances in aerogels for environmental remediation applications: a review. Chem Eng J 300:98–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faghihian H, Nourmoradi H, Shokouhi M (2014) Removal of copper (II) and nickel (II) from aqueous media using silica aerogel modified with amino propyl triethoxysilane as an adsorbent: equilibrium, kinetic, and isotherms study. Desalin Water Treat 52(1-3):305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Motahari S, Nodeh M, Maghsoudi K (2016) Absorption of heavy metals using resorcinol formaldehyde aerogel modified with amine groups. Desalin Water Treat 57(36):16886–16897Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Motahari S, Heidari BS, Motlagh GH (2015) Resorcinol formaldehyde xerogels modified with mercapto functional groups as mercury adsorbent. J Appl Polym Sci 132(37):42543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pekala R (1989) Organic aerogels from the polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde. J Mater Sci 24(9):3221–3227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sing KS (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl Chem 57(4):603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Velikova N, Vueva Y, Ivanova Y, Salvado I, Fernandes M, Vassileva P, Georgieva R, Detcheva A (2013) Synthesis and characterization of sol–gel mesoporous organosilicas functionalized with amine groups. J NonCryst Solids 378:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davachi SM, Heidari BS, Hejazi I, Seyfi J, Oliaei E, Farzaneh A, Rashedi H (2017) Interface modified polylactic acid/starch/poly ε-caprolactone antibacterial nanocomposite blends for medical applications. Carbohydr Polym 155:336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davoodi S, Oliaei E, Davachi SM, Hejazi I, Seyfi J, Heidari BS, Ebrahimi H (2016) Preparation and characterization of interface-modified PLA/starch/PCL ternary blends using PLLA/triclosan antibacterial nanoparticles for medical applications. RSC Adv 6(46):39870–39882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demjen Z, Pukanszky B, Nagy Jr J (1999) Possible coupling reactions of functional silanes and polypropylene. Polym (Guildf) 40(7):1763–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jafari M, Davachi SM, Mohammadi-Rovshandeh J, Pouresmaeel-Selakjani P (2017) Preparation and characterization of bionanocomposites based on benzylated wheat straw and nanoclay. J Polym Environ 17:(9)1–13Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davachi SM, Shekarabi AS (2018) Preparation and characterization of antibacterial, eco-friendly edible nanocomposite films containing Salvia macrosiphon and nanoclay. Int J Biol Macromol 113:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gwon JG, Lee SY, Doh GH, Kim JH (2010) Characterization of chemically modified wood fibers using FTIR spectroscopy for biocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 116(6):3212–3219Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Idris SA, Harvey SR, Gibson LT (2011) Selective extraction of mercury (II) from water samples using mercapto functionalised-MCM-41 and regeneration of the sorbent using microwave digestion. J Hazard Mater 193:171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang L, Tian Y, Ding H, Li J (2006) Microstructure and properties of organosoluble polyimide/silica hybrid films. Eur Polym J 42(11):2921–2930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bhatia QS, Pan DH, Koberstein JT (1988) Preferential surface adsorption in miscible blends of polystyrene and poly (vinyl methyl ether). Macromolecules 21(7):2166–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fu R, Yoshizawa N, Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Satcher JH, Baumann TF (2002) XPS study of copper-doped carbon aerogels. Langmuir 18(26):10100–10104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu X, Fan M, Shen X, Cui S, Tan G (2018) Silica aerogels formed from soluble silicates and methyl trimethoxysilane (MTMS) using CO2 gas as a gelation agent. Ceram Int 44(1):821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu F, Li J, Tian Y, Su Y, Wang J, Yang W, Li N, Chen S, Bao L (2015) 3D coral-like nitrogen-sulfur co-doped carbon-sulfur composite for high performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Sci Rep 5:13340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu ZK, Yang Y, Yin J, Qi ZN (1999) Preparation and properties of organosoluble polyimide/silica hybrid materials by sol–gel process. J Appl Polym Sci 73(14):2977–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reiche S, Blume R, Zhao XC, Su D, Kunkes E, Behrens M, Schlögl R (2014) Reactivity of mesoporous carbon against water–An in-situ XPS study. Carbon N Y 77:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang WJ, Neoh K-G, Kang E-T, Teo SL-M, Rittschof D (2013) Stainless steel surfaces with thiol-terminated hyperbranched polymers for functionalization via thiol-based chemistry. Polym Chem 4(10):3105–3115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aslam M, Gopakumar G, Shoba T, Mulla I, Vijayamohanan K, Kulkarni S, Urban J, Vogel W (2002) Formation of Cu and Cu2O nanoparticles by variation of the surface ligand: preparation, structure, and insulating-to-metallic transition. J Colloid Interface Sci 255(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Das D, Lee J-F, Cheng S (2004) Selective synthesis of Bisphenol-A over mesoporous MCM silica catalysts functionalized with sulfonic acid groups. J Catal 223(1):152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cano-Serrano E, Blanco-Brieva G, Campos-Martin J, Fierro J (2003) Acid-functionalized amorphous silica by chemical grafting-quantitative oxidation of thiol groups. Langmuir 19(18):7621–7627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van Bergen LA, Roos G, De Proft F (2014) From thiol to sulfonic acid: modeling the oxidation pathway of protein thiols by hydrogen peroxide. J Phys Chem A 118(31):6078–6084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gomes HT, Miranda SM, Sampaio MJ, Figueiredo JL, Silva AM, Faria JL (2011) The role of activated carbons functionalized with thiol and sulfonic acid groups in catalytic wet peroxide oxidation. Appl Catal B Environ 106(3-4):390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nikiforov AY, Leys C (2007) Influence of capillary geometry and applied voltage on hydrogen peroxide and OH radical formation in ac underwater electrical discharges. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 16(2):273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oyedoh EA, Albadarin A, Walker G, Mirzaeian M, Ahmad M (2013) Preparation of controlled porosity resorcinol formaldehyde xerogels for adsorption applications. Chem Eng Trans 32:1651–1656Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Awadallah-F A, Al-Muhtaseb SA (2013) Influence of micro-and mesoporosity of resorcinol–formaldehyde xerogels on adsorption. Environ Eng Sci 30(7):381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yan H, Jiang L, Xu X, Li Y, Shen Y, Zhu S (2017) Ultrastrong composite film of chitosan and silica-coated graphene oxide sheets. Int J Biol Macromol 104:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zvinowanda C, Okonkwo J, Shabalala P, Agyei N (2009) A novel adsorbent for heavy metal remediation in aqueous environments. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6(3):425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Foo K, Hameed B (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156(1):2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pan S, Shen H, Xu Q, Luo J, Hu M (2012) Surface mercapto engineered magnetic Fe 3 O 4 nanoadsorbent for the removal of mercury from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 365(1):204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jiao C, Xiong J, Tao J, Xu S, Zhang D, Lin H, Chen Y (2016) Sodium alginate/graphene oxide aerogel with enhanced strength–toughness and its heavy metal adsorption study. Int J Biol Macromol 83:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Deze EG, Papageorgiou SK, Favvas EP, Katsaros FK (2012) Porous alginate aerogel beads for effective and rapid heavy metal sorption from aqueous solutions: effect of porosity in Cu 2 + and Cd 2 + ion sorption. Chem Eng J 209:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Qi Y, Wang J, Wang X, Cheng JJ, Wen Z (2017) Selective adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution using porous biosilica extracted from marine diatom biomass: properties and mechanism. Appl Surf Sci 396:965–977.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Goel J, Kadirvelu K, Rajagopal C, Garg V (2005) Removal of lead (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption on carbon aerogel using a response surface methodological approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(7):1987–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Behzad Shiroud Heidari
    • 1
  • Vajiheh-Sadat Cheraghchi
    • 2
  • Siamak Motahari
    • 1
  • Ghodratollah Hashemi Motlagh
    • 1
  • Seyed Mohammad Davachi
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Petrochemical EngineeringAmirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic)MahshahrIran
  3. 3.Soft Tissue Engineering Research Center, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine InstituteIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations