Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 49–56 | Cite as

Elimination of dissolved Fe3+ ions from water by electrocoagulation

  • Jana Gaalova
  • Pavel Krystynik
  • Pavel Dytrych
  • Petr Kluson
Original Paper: Nano-structured materials (particles, fibers, colloids, composites, etc.)
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Electrocoagulation (EC) was applied for elimination of dissolved Fe3+ ions from model contaminated water. Electrochemical experiments were performed using a coagulation set-up with the volume of storage tank of 50 L. To represent inorganic contamination, FeCl3·6H2O was chosen as a model pollutant; its concentration was equal to 50 mg/L. Experiments were carried out by circulating model effluent (1 pass) through the cell at a flow rate (40 L/h) whilst operating the power supply in galvanostatic mode. Dosing concentration was varying by changing the input current between set points and holding for sufficient time for steady state to be reached and for a sample to be collected. The process using the steel electrode reached removal efficiency up to 99%, depending on pH, and proved to be very suitable for elimination of dissolved Fe3+ ions from water. However, electrochemical experiments using the aluminum electrode reached removal efficiency only up to 25%. The different efficiency of two anodes is probably due to lower adsorption capacity of hydrous aluminum oxide for iron ions in comparison to hydrous ferric oxides. Produced nanostructured flocs were subsequently filtered, dried, and characterized by N2 physisorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Obtained characteristics synchronously demonstrate different tendencies of Al and Fe nanostructured flocs.

Keywords

Water treatment Iron Electrocoagulation Nanostructured flocs Aluminum Steel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (project No.: TA04020130) is gratefully acknowledged. Part of the work was financed by Research Infrastructure NanoEnviCZ (project No.: LM2015073).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Khatri N, Tyagi S, Rawtani D (2017) Recent strategies for the removal of iron from water: a review. J Water Process Eng 19:291–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tekerlekopoulou AG, Vasiliadou IA, Vayenas DV (2006) Physico-chemical and biological iron removal from potable water. Biochem Eng J 31(1):74–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2006.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Du X, Liu G, Qu F, Li K, Shao S, Li G, Liang H (2017) Removal of iron, manganese and ammonia from groundwater using a PAC-MBR system: the anti-pollution ability, microbial population and membrane fouling. Desalination 403(Supplement C):97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alimohammadi V, Sedighi M, Jabbari E (2017) Experimental study on efficient removal of total iron from wastewater using magnetic-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Ecol Eng 102(Supplement C):90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis D, Bouchard C, Lantagne G (2000) Removal of iron and manganese from groundwater by oxidation and microfiltration. Desalination 130(3):255–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00090-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vaaramaa K, Lehto J (2003) Removal of metals and anions from drinking water by ion exchange. Desalination 155(2):157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00293-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersen WC, Bruno TJ (2003) Application of a gas–liquid entraining rotor to supercritical fluid extraction: Removal of iron(III) from water. Anal Chim Acta 485(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00400-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Talaiekhozani A, Talaei MR, Rezania S (2017) An overview on production and application of ferrate (VI) for chemical oxidation, coagulation and disinfection of water and wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 5(2):1828–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mollah MYA, Schennach R, Parga JR, Cocke DL (2001) Electrocoagulation (EC)—science and applications. J Hazard Mater 84(1):29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00176-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hakizimana JN, Gourich B, Chafi M, Stiriba Y, Vial C, Drogui P, Naja J (2017) Electrocoagulation process in water treatment: a review of electrocoagulation modeling approaches. Desalination 404(Supplement C):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tito DN, Krystynik P, Kluson P (2016) Notes on process and data analysis in electro-coagulation—the importance of standardisation and clarity. Chem Eng Process 104(Supplement C):22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwertmann U (1991) Solubility and dissolution of iron oxides. In: Chen Y, Hadar Y (eds) Iron nutrition and interactions in plants: “Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on iron nutrition and interactions in plants”, 11–17 June 1989, Jerusalem, Israel, 1989. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3294-7_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moussa DT, El-Naas MH, Nasser M, Al-Marri MJ (2017) A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. J Environ Manage 186(Part 1):24–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashim KS, Shaw A, Al Khaddar R, Pedrola MO, Phipps D (2017) Iron removal, energy consumption and operating cost of electrocoagulation of drinking water using a new flow column reactor. J Environ Manage 189(Supplement C):98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krystynik P, Kluson P, Tito DN (2015) Water treatment process intensification by combination of electrochemical and photochemical methods. Chem Eng Process 94(Supplement C):85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lecloux A, Pirard JP (1979) Importance of standard isotherms in the analysis of adsorption-isotherms for determining the porous texture of solids. J Colloid Interface Sci 70(2):265–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(79)90031-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shirley DA (1972) High-resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys Rev B 5(12):4709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aber S, Amani-Ghadim AR, Mirzajani V (2009) Removal of Cr(VI) from polluted solutions by electrocoagulation: Modeling of experimental results using artificial neural network. J Hazard Mater 171(1):484–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghosh D, Solanki H, Purkait MK (2008) Removal of Fe(II) from tap water by electrocoagulation technique. J Hazard Mater 155(1):135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krystynik P, Tito DN (2017) Key process parameters affecting performance of electro-coagulation. Chem Eng Process 117(Supplement C):106–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the ASCRPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of J. E. PurkyneUsti nad LabemCzech Republic
  3. 3.Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPrague 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations