Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 125–135 | Cite as

Optimization of process parameters and its effect on structure and morphology of CuO nanoparticle synthesized via the sol−gel technique

  • Hafsa Siddiqui
  • Mohammad Ramzan Parra
  • Fozia Z. Haque
Original Paper: Nano-structured materials (particles, fibers, colloids, composites, etc.)

Abstract

This article describes systematic basic research on the optimization of the processing parameters of sol−gel technique for synthesis of the high purity CuO nanoparticles. Effect of the synthesis parameters such as copper salt concentration, solvent and gelating agent, optimized one at a time, was investigated by employing XRD, TEM, FESEM, micro-Raman, UV-visible-NIR and PL spectroscopies. XRD results clearly demonstrate the monoclinic structure of CuO nanoparticles with traceable impurities at a lower molar concentration of Cu2+, transition of nucleation system from homogeneous to heterogeneous state with the increase in concentration of Cu2+ from 0.05 to 0.15 M. It was also found that the isopropyl alcohol offers better results in comparison to ethanol and water. Moreover, the lattice parameters, space group, and crystal system were determined by powder X-ray diffraction method. Further we propose the optimization of synthesis process using ethylene glycol and citric acid (EG:CA). The Raman analysis confirmed the influence of ethylene glycol and citric acid ratio and TEM observations confirmed that EG:CA 1:2 ratio formulate homogenous flower-like nanostructures. The optical absorption of CuO nanostructures can be easily tuned by varying the concentration of citric acid without changing other conditions; it shows the role of synthesis parameters more significant. Our results suggest that the prepared CuO nanostructures have a potential to be used as absorbing material in solar cell applications.

Highlights

  • CuO nanoparticles are successfully synthesized via simple non-aqueous sol-gel method.

  • The effect of various process parameters on the morphology and structure of CuO nanoparticles are investigated.

  • Vibrant modifications in the morphology of CuO nanoparticles are detected via TEM and SEM.

  • Isopropyl alcohol gives better crystallization of CuO nanostructures in comparison to ethanol.

  • 1:2 ratio of ethylene glycol and citric acid yield superior assembly of CuO nanostructures.

Keywords

CuO nanostructures Sol–gel technique Solvent Gelating agent Citric acid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ms. Hafsa Siddiqui and Mr. Mohammad Ramzan Parra deeply acknowledge the UGC, New Delhi, and HRDG-CSIR for the financial support given in the form of UGC-MANF reference no. F1-17.1/2011-12/MANF-MUS-MAD-4694 and CSIR-SRF ack. no. 163320/2K14/1. The authors would like to acknowledge the Director-UGC-DAE-Consortium for Scientific Research, Indore Centre (M.P.), India for performing XRD, Raman and UV−Vis-diffused reflectance measurements. The authors are very grateful to the USIF-AMU, Aligarh (U.P.) for the TEM facility, and Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, India for the FESEM facility.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10971_2018_4663_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3.5 mb)
Electronic supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Siddiqui H, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2017) pH-dependent single-step rapid synthesis of CuO nanoparticles and their optical behavior. Opt Spectrosc 123(6):903–912.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X17120013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siddiqui H, Parra MR, Pandey P, Singh N, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2012) A review: synthesis, characterization and cell performance of Cu2O based material for solar cells. Orient J Chem 28(3):1533–1545.  https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/280361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schreier M, Héroguel F, Steier L, Ahmad S, Luterbacher JS, Mayer MT, Luo J, Grätzel M (2017) Solar conversion of CO2 to CO using Earth-abundant electrocatalysts prepared by atomic layer modification of CuO. Nat Energy 2:17087.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Q, Zhang K, Xu D, Yang G, Huang H, Nie F, Liu C, Yang S (2014) CuO nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, growth mechanisms, fundamental properties, and applications. ‎Prog Mater Sci 60:208–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tran TH, Nguyen VT (2014) Copper oxide nanomaterials prepared by solution methods, some properties, and potential applications: a brief review. Int Sch Res Not 2014:856592.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/856592 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grigore ME, Biscu ER, Holban AM, Gestal MC, Grumezescu AM (2016) Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of CuO nanoparticles. Pharmaceuticals 9(4):75.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ph9040075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayaprakash J, Srinivasan N, Chandrasekaran P (2014) Surface modifications of CuO nanoparticles using Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid as a capping agent by sol-gel routine. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 123:363–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.12.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun S, Yang Q, Liang S, Yang Z (2017) Hollow CuxO (x = 2,1) micro/nanostructures: synthesis, fundamental properties and applications. CrystEngComm 19:6225–6251.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE01530E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernánde AI, Calleja A, Chimenos JM, Fernández MA, Capdevila XG, Segarra M, Xuriguera H, Espiell F (2005) Preparation of ultra-fine CuO: comparison of polymer gel methods and conventional precipitation processes. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 36:11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-005-4789-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etefagh R, Azhir E, Shahtahmasebi N (2013) Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles and fabrication of nanostructural layer biosensors for detecting Aspergillus niger fungi. Sci Iran 20(3):1055–1058Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bibi M, Javed QA, Abbas H, Baqi S (2017) Outcome of temperature variation on sol-gel prepared CuO nanostructure properties (optical and dielectric). Mater Chem Phys 192:67–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.01.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Usha V, Kalyanaraman S, Thangavel R, Vettumperumal R (2015) Effect of catalysts on the synthesis of CuO nanoparticles: structural and optical properties by sol–gel method. Superlattice Micro 86:203–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2015.07.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niederberger M, Pinna N (2009) Metal oxide nanoparticles in organic solvents. Springer-Verlag, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-671-7
  14. 14.
    Pandey P, Kurchania R, Haque FZ (2014) Optical studies of Europium-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel technique. J Adv Phys 3(2):104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niederberger M (2007) Nonaqueous sol–gel routes to metal oxide nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res 40(9):793–800.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar600035e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Danks AE, Hall SR, Schnepp Z (2016) The evolution of ‘sol–gel’ chemistry as a technique for materials synthesis. Mater Horiz 3:91–112.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MH00260E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan M, Memic A (2012) Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and -negative bacterial strains. Int J Nanomed 7:3527–3535.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S29020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhaumik A, Shearin AM, Patel R, Ghosh K (2014) Significant enhancement of optical absorption through nano-structuring of copper based oxide semiconductors: possible future materials for solar energy applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:11054–11066.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP00827H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Z, Tong K, Shi R, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Yao Z, Fan J, Thwaites M, Shao G (2017) Reactive plasma deposition of high quality single phase CuO thin films suitable for metal oxide solar cells. J Alloy Compd 695:3116–3123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong TKS, Zhuk S, Masudy-Panah S, Dalapati GK (2016) Current status and future prospects of copper oxide heterojunction solar cells Materials 9(4):271.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dutta D (2016) Optimization of process parameters and its effect on particle size and morphology of ZnO nanoparticle synthesized by sol–gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2016) 77:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3827-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2005) Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev 105(4):1025–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030063a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thanh NTK, Maclean N, Mahiddine S (2014) Mechanisms of nucleation and growth of nanoparticles in solution. Chem Rev 114(15):7610–7630.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400544s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mallick P, Sahu S (2012) Structure, microstructure and optical absorption analysis of CuO nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel route. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2(3):71–74.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.nn.20120203.05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamanaka T, Masumori K, Ishikawa R, Ueno K, Shirai H (2016) Role of isopropyl alcohol solvent in the synthesis of organic–inorganic halide CH(NH2)2PbIxBr3–x perovskite thin films by a two-step method. J Phys Chem C 120(44):25371–25377.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manohar A, Krishnamoorthi C (2017) Site selective Cu 2+ substitution in single crystal Fe3O4 biocompatible nanospheres by solvothermal reflux method. J Cryst Growth 473:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lu Y, Yan H, Qiu K, Cheng J, Wang W, Liu X, Tang C, Kim J-K, Luo Y (2015) Hierarchical porous CuO nanostructures with tunable properties for high performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv 5:10773–10781.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA16924G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parra MR, Haque FZ (2015) Poly (Ethylene Glycol) (PEG)-assisted shape-controlled synthesis of one-dimensional ZnO nanorods. Optik 126(18):1562–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Siddiqui H, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2016) Hexamine (HMT) assisted wet chemically synthesized CuO nanostructures with controlled morphology and adjustable optical behavior. Opt Quant Electron 48:349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-016-0618-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siddiqui H, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2016) Surfactant assisted wet chemical synthesis of copper oxide (CuO) nanostructures and their spectroscopic analysis. Optik 127:2740–2747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.11.220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siddiqui H, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2014) Structural and optical properties of CuO nanocubes prepared through simple hydrothermal route. J Sci Eng Res 5(3):173–177Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jana R, Saha P, Pareek V, Basu A, Kapri S, Bhattacharyya S, Mukherjee GD (2016) High pressure experimental studies on CuO: indication of re-entrant multiferroicity at room temperature. Sci Rep 6:31610.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Siddiqui H, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2016) Effect of copper precursor salts: facile and sustainable synthesis of controlled shaped copper oxide nanoparticles. Optik 127(11):4726–4730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Siddiqui, H, Parra, MR, Qureshi MS, Haque FZ (2018) Studies of structural, optical, and electrical properties associated with defects in sodium-doped copper oxide (CuO/Na) nanostructures. J Mater Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2179-6
  35. 35.
    Sharma A, Dutta RK, Roychowdhury A, Das D (2016) Studies on structural defects in bare, PVP capped and TPPO capped copper oxide nanoparticles by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy and their impact on photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B. RSC Adv 6:74812–74821.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA12795A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shrivastava M, Kumari R, Parra MR, Pandey P, Siddiqui H, Haque FZ (2017) Electrochemical synthesis of MoS2 quantum dots embedded nanostructured porous silicon with enhanced electroluminescence property. Opt Mater 73:763–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2017.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parra MR, Haque FZ (2015) Optical study and ruthenizer (II) N3 dye-sensitized solar cell application of ZnO nanorod-arrays synthesized by combine two-step process. Opt Spectrosc 119:672.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X15100197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parra MR, Haque FZ (2015) Optical investigation of various morphologies of ZnO nanostructures prepared by PVP-assisted wet chemical method. Opt Spectrosc 118(5):765.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X15030182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haque FZ, Nandanwar R, Singh P (2017) Evaluating photodegradation properties of anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles for organic compounds. Optik 128:191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.025Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Haque FZ, Parra MR, Siddiqui H, Singh N, Singh N, Pandey P, Mishra KM (2016) PVP Assisted shape-controlled synthesis of self-assembled 1D ZnO and 3D CuO nanostructures. Opt Spectrosc 120(3):408.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X16030085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fang M, He H, Lu B, Zhang W, Zhao B, Ye Z, Huang J (2011) Optical properties of p-type CuAlO2 thin film grown by rf magnetron sputtering. Appl Surf Sci 257:8330–8333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Iqbal M, Thebo AA, Shah AH, Iqbal A, Thebo KH, Phulpoto S, Mohsin MA (2017) Influence of Mn-doping on the photocatalytic and solar cell efficiency of CuO nanowires. Inorg Chem Commun 76:71–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2016.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zoolfakar AS, Rani RA, Morfa AJ, O’Mullane AP, Kalantar-zadeh K (2014) Nanostructured copper oxide semiconductors: a perspective on materials, synthesis methods and applications. J Mater Chem C 2:5247.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TC00345D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sukhorukov YP, Loshkareva NN, Samokhvalov AA, Moskvin AS (1995) Absorption spectra of CuO single crystals near the absorption edge and the nature of the optical gap in copper oxides. J Exp Theor Phys 81(5):998. http://doi.org/1063-7761/95/110998-05$10.00Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chowdhury A, Bijalwan PK, Sahu RK (2014) Investigations on the role of alkali to obtain modulated defect concentrations for Cu2O thin films. Appl Surf Sci 289:430–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Balamurugan B, Mehta B, Avasthi D, Singh F, Arora A, Rajalakshmi M, Raghavan G, Tyagi A, Shivaprasad S (2002) Modifying the nanocrystalline characteristics—structure, size, and surface states of copper oxide thin films by high-energy heavy-ion irradiation. J Appl Phys 92:3304.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1499752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
Corrected publication June/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Optical Nanomaterials Lab, Department of PhysicsMaulana Azad National Institute of TechnologyBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations