Stereolithographic printing of radionuclide doped resins

  • S. C. MellardEmail author
  • S. R. Biegalski


Methods for stereolithographic printing of novel geometries and materials were investigated using 198Au doped commercially available resins. Test coupons were printed to find the specific activity and homogeneity of radionuclides throughout the medium. Initial trials of the technology were used to print pellets with 198Au specific activities with an average of 2.74 × 102 ± 2.9% Bq g−1 to 6.7 × 10−1 ± 11.6% Bq g−1. Mixing qualities varied from 0.99 to 0.91. Geometric shapes were printed to probe the source-geometry sensitivity of the gamma detection apparatus. This manuscript serves as proof of concept for the technique.


Additive manufacturing Detector calibration Stereolithography Source manufacturing 198Au 



  1. 1.
    Kodama H (1981) Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer. Rev Sci Instrum 52:1770–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hull CW (1984) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. United States Patent 4,575,330Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceh J, Youd T, Mastrovich Z, Peterson C, Khan S, Sasser TA (2017) Bismuth infusion of ABS enables additive manufacturing of complex radiological phantoms. Sensors 17(3):459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leary M, Kron T, Keller C, Franich R, Lonski P (2015) Additive manufacture of custom radiation dosimetry phantoms: an automated method compatible with commercial polymer 3D printers. Mater Des 86:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moayyad A, Tajuddin AA, Abdulmanapa M, Zainona R (2017) Evaluation of 3D printing materials for fabrication of a novel multifunctional. Rad Phys Chem 135:106–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabal FP, Lopez-Pino N, Bernal-Castillo JL, Martinez-Palenzuela YM, Aguilar-Mena J, Alessandro KD, Arbelo Y, Corrales Y, Diaz O (2010) Monte Carlo based geometrical model for efficiency calculation of an n-type HPGe detector. Appl Radiat Isot 68:2403–2408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping & manufacturing: fundamentals of stereolithography. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, DearbornGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brookhaven Nation Research Laboratory NuDat 2.7. Accessed 9 June 2019
  9. 9.
    Mirion Technologies Inc. (2019) Spectrum analysis. Nuclear measurement principles. Accessed 14 July 2019
  10. 10.
    Nir-El Y (2013) Correction for decay of during counting in gamma spectrometry. Radiat Prot Dosim 153(3):400–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knoll GF (2010) Radiation detection and measurement. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lacey PMC (1954) Developments in the theory of particle mixing. J Appl Chem 4:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ku HH (1966) Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas. J Res Natl Bureau Stand 70C(4):263–273Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berk Z (2013) In: Food process engineering and technology. Elsevier Science and Technology, San Diego, pp 193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strauss MG, Sherman IS, Cattelino MJ, Brenner R, Richard HP (1977) Intrinsic efficiency of germanium—a basis for calculating expected detector efficiency. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 24(1):88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tyrka S (1999) A method for calculating the average solid angle subtended by a circular disk from uniformly distributed points within a coaxial circular plane. Rev Sci Instrum 70:3915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guest PG (1961) The solid angle subtended by a cylinder. Rev Sci Instrum 32:164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Material Datasheet Standard Resin, Formlabs Inc. Accessed 29 July 2019
  19. 19.
    MakerBot Industries LLC (2019). Accessed 6 June 2019
  20. 20.
    Cao L, Jarrel J, White S, Herminghuysen K, Kauffman A, Hardtmayer DE, Sanders J, Li S (2019) A radioactive tracer dilution method to determine the mass of molten salt. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters DC (1997) Dynamics of emulsification. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (eds) Mixing in process industries. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 294–321Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear and Radiological EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations