Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 2, pp 337–346 | Cite as

Feasibility of using “Off-The-Shelf” clinical linac for soil multi-elemental instrumental photon activation analysis

  • Tserenpil ShurkhuuEmail author
  • Christian P. Segebade
  • Haris Dapo
  • Ismail Boztosun
  • Grigory K. Vostokin
  • Oleg D. Maslov
  • Anatoliy G. Belov


“Off-the-shelf” clinical linear electron accelerators (LINAC) have been suggested as alternative to research accelerators once they are no longer suitable for the medical applications. We investigated feasibility of utilising a modified LINAC for instrumental photon activation analysis (IPAA) as a tool in environmental geochemistry studies. The IPAA results were compared with those obtained using a MT-25 research accelerator at Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. To investigate soil pollution in Antalya, Turkey, 90 surface soil samples were analysed and significant enrichments of Ni, Cr and As were found.


Antalya soil Linear accelerator Photon activation analysis Photon source 



This was TS’s last work with her mentor O.D.M who was a great radio analytical chemist, thinker and mentor. Authors thank to Chinzorig Bat for his hard work during the sampling and to Prof. Erik Jeppesen for his valuable comments and corrections throughout manuscript preparation. The project was fully funded by BIDEB-2221 program, TUBITAK, Project # 97883784/604.99/. Reviewers’ comments and suggestions greatly improved discussions and quality of this work.


  1. 1.
    Chattopadhyay A, Jervis RE (1974) Multielement determination in market-garden soils by instrumental photon activiation analysis. Anal Chem 46:1630–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Starovoitova V, Segebade C (2016) High intensity photon sources for activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 310:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Segebade C, Starovoitova V, Bogwart T, Wells D (2017) Principles, methodologies, and applications of photon activation analysis: a review. J Radioanal Chem 312:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebihara M, Oura Y, Ishii T, Setoguchi H, Nakahara H, Ohtsuki T (2000) How effectively is the photon activation analysis applied to meteorite sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 244:491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krist P, Horák Z, Mizera J, Chvátil D, Vogar M, Randa Z (2014) Innovations at the MT 25 microtron aimed at applications in photon activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maslov OD, Gustova MV, Belov AG, Drobina TP (2012) Determination of magnesium, aluminum and silicon content in water samples by gamma-activation and neutron-activation analyses using the MT-25 microtron. Conference: ISINN-19 Dubna May 25–28, 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McEwen MR, Ross CK (2003) Performance of an “Off–the–shelf” clinical linac for radiation standards dosimetry. In: Proceedings of a workshop on recent advances in absorbed dose standards (ARPANSA, Melbourne),,2003. Accessed Apr 2019
  8. 8.
    Boztosun İ, Dapo H, Özmen SF, Çeçen Y, Karakoç M, Çoban A, Cesur A, Caner T, Bayram E, Keller GB, Küçük B, Güvendi A, Derman M, Kaya D (2014) The results of the first photonuclear reaction performed in Turkey: the zinc example. Turk J Phys. 38:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kavun U, Boztosun I, Dapo H, Maras I, Segebade C (2018) Determination of the Sr/Ca ratio of tooth samples by photoactivation analysis in Southern Turkey. Radiochim Acta 106:759–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Report of Antalya Province. 2000 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eugenia GG, Vicente A, Rafael B (1996) Heavy metals incidence in the application of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides of rice farming soils. Environ Pollut 92:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Öztürk F, Zararsız A, Dutkiewicz VA, Husain L, Hopke PK, Tuncel G (2012) Temporal variations and sources of Eastern Mediterranean aerosols based on a 9-year observation. Atmos Environ 61:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kubilay N, Nickovic S, Moulin C, Dulac F (2000) An illustration of the transport of mineral dust onto the eastern Mediterranean. Atmos Environ 34:1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dayan U, Heffter J, Miller J, Gutman G (1991) Dust intrusion events into the Mediterranean basin. J Appl Meteorol 30:1185–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Türküm A, Pekey B, Pekey H, Tuncel G (2008) Comparison of sources affecting chemical compositions of aerosol and rainwater at different locations in Turkey. Atmos Res 89:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gülten YA (2011) Heavy metal contamination of surface soil around Gebze industrial area, Turkey. Microchem J 99:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Schmitt BF, Segebade C, Fusban HU (1980) Waste incineration ash—a versatile environmental reference material. J Radioanal Chem 60:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reeves RD, Adiguzel N (2008) The nickel hyperaccumulating plants of the serpentines of Turkey and adjacent areas: a review with new data. Turk J Bot 32:143–153Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wedepohl HK (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Bowen HJM (1979) The environmental chemistry of the elements. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guvenç N, Alagha O, Tuncel G (2003) Investigation of soil multi-element composition in Antalya, Turkey. Environ Int 29:631–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reeves RD (2004) Rare plants and nickel accumulators from Turkish serpentine soils, with special reference to Centuatea species. Turk J Bot 28:147–153Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 331Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shtangeeva I, Bali R, Harris A (2011) Bioavailability and toxicity of antimony. J Geochem Explor 110:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Application and Research CenterAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.Nuclear Research CenterNational University of MongoliaUlaanbaatarMongolia
  3. 3.Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear ReactionsJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia

Personalised recommendations