Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 2, pp 639–648 | Cite as

A two-point in situ method for simultaneous analysis of radioactivity in seawater and sediment

  • Jun-Ho Lee
  • Jong-In ByunEmail author
  • Dong-Myung Lee
Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

A new in situ radioactivity analysis method was developed to determine the fractional contributions of gamma-ray emitters in seawater and sediment from total measured counts. A semi-empirical formula to determine the fractional count contributions was derived using the variation characteristics of the gamma-ray attenuation rate and geometrical efficiency with the measurement points. The proposed method was employed to make in situ gamma-ray measurements using a CeBr3 detector for radioactivity analysis of seawater and sediment at a coastal area with a relatively high tidal range. The full energy peak efficiency of the detector at measurement site was obtained using the GEANT4 simulation code. The radioactivity concentration of 40K in seawater and sediment was determined using the proposed method and laboratory analysis with sampling. The MDA of the in situ measurement for 137Cs and 131I was also estimated assuming they were deposited on the sediment surface-layer. The validation of this method was demonstrated by comparing with the sampling analysis results.

Keywords

In situ gamma-ray measurement Radioactivity Seawater Sediment GEANT4 code 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Tsabaris C (2008) Monitoring natural and artificial radioactivity enhancement in the Aegean Sea using floating measuring systems. Appl Radiat Isot 66:1599–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones DG (2001) Development and application of marine gamma-ray measurements: a review. J Environ Radioact 53:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Androulakaki EG, Kokkoris M, Skordis E, Fatsea E, Patiris DL, Tsabaris C, Vlastou R (2016) Implementation of FLUKA for γ-ray applications in the marine environment. J Environ Radioact 164:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Androulakaki EG, Kokkoris M, Tsabaris C, Eleftheriou G, Patiris DL, Pappa FK, Vlastou R (2016) In situ γ-ray spectrometry in the marine environment using full spectrum analysis for natural radionuclides. Appl Radiat Isot 114:76–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Androulakaki EG, Tsabaris C, Eleftheriou G, Kokkoris M, Patiris DL, Pappa FK, Vlastou R (2016) Efficiency calibration for in situ γ-ray measurements on the seabed using Monte Carlo simulations: application in two different marine environments. J Environ Radioact 164:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsabaris C, Bagatelas C, Dakladas T, Papadopoulos CT, Vlastou R, Chronis GT (2008) An autonomous in situ detection system for radioactivity measurements in the marine environment. Appl Radiat Isot 66:1419–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency (2016) KHOA smart tide forecast and Korea real time database for North–East Asian regional global ocean observing system (NEAR-GOOS). http://www.khoa.go.kr/swtc/main.do
  8. 8.
    Quarati F, Dorenbos P, van Der Biezen J, Owens A, Selle M, Parthier L, Schotanus P (2013) Scintillation and detection characteristics of high-sensitivity CeBr3 gamma-ray spectrometers. Nucl Instrum Methods A 729:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jun-Ho Lee, Jong-In Byun, Dong-Myung Lee (2019) In-situ CeBr3 gamma-ray spectrometry for radioactivity analysis of soil. J Radioanal Nucl Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ICRU 53 (1994) Gamma-ray spectrometry in the environment. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Bethesda, Maryland. Report 53Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arnold D, Sima O (2004) Extension of the efficiency calibration of germanium detectors using the GESPECOR software. Appl Radiat Isot 61:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, Arce P, Asai M, Aso T, Bagli E, Bagulya A, Banerjee S, Barrand G, Beck BR (2016) Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl Instrum Methods A 835:186–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geant4 Collaboration (2016) Toolkit developers guide. Available online at: http://cern.ch/Geant4
  14. 14.
    Joel JSC, Maurice NM, Jilbert NME, Ousmanou M, David S (2018) Monte Carlo method for gamma spectrometry based on GEANT4 tookit: efficiency calibration of BE6530 detector. J Environ Radioact 189:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Masri MS, Hasan M, Al-Hamwi A, Amin Y, Doubal AW (2013) Mass attenuation coefficients of soil and sediment samples using gamma energies from 46.5 to 1332 keV. J Environ Radioact 116:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem 40:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Korea Institute of Nuclear SafetyDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations