Advertisement

Neutron reflector analysis for the beam-port of the Missouri S&T Reactor

  • Tayfun AkyurekEmail author
  • Warren S. Vaz
  • Ayodeji B. Alajo
  • Jeffrey C. King
  • Shoaib Usman
  • Carlos H. C. Giraldo
Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

A preliminary neutron reflector material selection and feasibility study of an inexpensive reflector replacement for the neutron beam-port at the 200 kW Missouri University of Science and Technology Research Reactor (MSTR) was conducted using Monte-Carlo techniques. The Monte-Carlo N-Particle transport code (MCNP6.1) was used to model the neutron beam-port of the Missouri S&T Reactor in order to study the effects of adding different reflector materials, in terms of the neutron flux reaching the radiography/tomography facility in front of MSTR’s neutron beam-port. Aluminum, beryllium, titanium, nickel, nickel-58, lead, bismuth, tungsten and stainless steel reflectors were modeled to find the best neutron reflector for the beam-port. After examining reflector materials, it was concluded that none of them were an improvement over the current design. Experimental thermal flux was measured to be 1.0 × 107 ± 3.16 × 103 cm−2 s−1 at the exit of beam port for current version of beam-port. The current ratio of beam port inlet and outlet obtained from simulations was found to be 3.37 × 104. The flux of beam port inlet was determined on the order of 1.0 × 1011 cm−2 s−1 which is consistent with previous findings.

Keywords

Inexpensive neutron reflector Neutron beam-port Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the reactor staff for providing the beam-port blueprints and other reactor related information for the preparation of this article. This study was supported by Marmara University, Scientific Research Commission (BAPKO) under the research Project FEN-A-131016-0466. The corresponding author would also like to express his appreciation to Dr. Ozgur Delice for the fruitful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Kulage ZA et al (2013) Characterization of the neutron flux energy spectrum at the Missouri University of Science and Technology Research Reactor (MSTR). Nucl Eng Des 261:174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tucker Lucas P et al (2016) Upgrade and simulation of the subcritical assembly at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Nucl Technol 194:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sinha V et al (2013) Design and development of a neutron/X-ray combined computed tomography system at Missouri S&T. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinha V et al (2014) A novel method for NDT applications using NXCT system at the Missouri University of Science & Technology. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 50:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grant E et al (2011) Internet accessible hot cell with gamma spectroscopy at the Missouri S&T Nuclear Reactor. Nucl Eng Des 241:3306–3316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abir M et al (2014) Assessment of nuclear fuels using radiographic thickness measurement method. Trans Am Nucl Soc 111(1):520–522Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akyurek T et al (2016) Portable spectroscopic fast neutron probe and 3He detector dead-time measurements. Prog Nucl Energy 92:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carter LL, Cashwell ED (1975) Particle transport simulation with the Monte Carlo method, ERDA critical review series, TID-26607. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blueprints R105864-Extension Sub Assy-Beam Tube, 4/24/1959. R-105857-Tube ASS’Y-6” Beam (S.P.R.), 3/31/1959. R106008-Hole Assembly-6” Beam Missouri S. P. R., 9/17/59. Curtiss-Wright Corp. Research Division, Clifton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sasaki M, Hirota J (1995) Beam hole configuration and analysis of medical reactor for boron neutron capture therapy. J Nucl Sci Technol 32(2):142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akyurek T, Usman S (2015) Spent fuel investigation using delayed fast neutron spectrum at Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor. Prog Nucl Energy 85:525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castano HC et al (2013) Active heat removal system for continuous operation of the Missouri S&T Reactor. Trans Am Nucl Soc 109:1055–1057Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albarqi M et al (2019) Neutron flux characterization of the beam port of the Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 321:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richardson BP et al (2012) Modeling and validation of approach to criticality and axial flux profile experiments at the Missouri S&T Reactor (MSTR). Nucl Eng Des 245:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richardson B et al (2017) Modeling and validation of temperature and void effects on reactivity experiments at the Missouri S&T Research Reactor. Nucl Sci Eng 187:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akyurek T, Usman S (2019) Determination of plutonium and uranium content and burnup using six group delayed neutrons. Nucl Eng Technol 51:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watt BE (1952) Energy spectrum of neutrons from thermal fission of U235. Phys Rev 87:1037–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sears VF (1992) Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. Neutron News 3:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ing H et al (2007) Portable spectroscopic neutron probe. Radiat Prot Dosim 126:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al Qahtani M, Alajo AB (2017) Characterization of prompt neutron spectrum of the Missouri University of Science and Technology Reactor. Nucl Eng Des 320:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tayfun Akyurek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Warren S. Vaz
    • 2
  • Ayodeji B. Alajo
    • 2
  • Jeffrey C. King
    • 3
  • Shoaib Usman
    • 2
  • Carlos H. C. Giraldo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Art and ScienceMarmara UniversityKadikoy, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Nuclear EngineeringMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  3. 3.Nuclear Science and EngineeringColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations