Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 322, Issue 2, pp 263–269 | Cite as

Simple methods for calculating activity of a parent-progeny system

  • Cong WeiEmail author
  • Kelly Garnick
  • Thomas Scott
  • Anthony Wetherby
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the original work of Rutherford (Radio-activity, 1905) and Bateman (Proc Camb Philos Soc 15:423–427, 1910), the authors designed two schemes consisting of explicit equations as simple methods for accurately obtaining activity of 90Sr and 90Y before they reach secular equilibrium. Application of the methods to the 90Sr/90Y system where 90Sr and 90Y are not in equilibrium will substantially reduce the time needed for determining activity of 90Sr because neither sequential measurements of 90Sr or 90Y (up to about 2 weeks) nor waiting for 90Sr and 90Y to reach equilibrium (more than 3 weeks) will be needed. We also implemented the explicit equations for decay/ingrowth correction of progeny’s activity and applied them to the 95Zr/95Nb system. Using the equations, the authors corrected activity concentrations of 95Nb to a designated reference time from the activity concentrations measured from samples at different times, for instance, 2, 8, 15, and 29 days after a reference time. During those measurement times, 95Nb and 95Zr were not in equilibrium. The corrected 95Nb activity concentrations were within an accuracy of − 10%.

Keywords

89,90Sr/9095Zr/95Nb Ingrowth correction Rapid analysis Nuclear incident Secular equilibrium 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Brian Baker and Patrick Regan of FDA/ORA/WEAC for their support of this work. The authors also wish to thank the FRMAC organizers especially Phil Torretto for the inter-laboratory comparison study opportunity. In addition, the authors wish to acknowledge Larry Jassin at EZA for providing us with blank air filter samples before the exercise.

Supplementary material

10967_2019_6724_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 48 kb)
10967_2019_6724_MOESM2_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)
10967_2019_6724_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 1026 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rutherford E (1905) Radio-activity, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, p 332. https://archive.org/details/radioactivity00ruthgoog
  2. 2.
    Bateman H (1910) The Solution of a system of differential equations occurring in the theory of radio-active transformations. Proc Camb Philos Soc 15:423–427Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cetnar J (2006) General solution of Bateman equations for nuclear transmutations. Ann Nucl Energy 33:640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thibes R, de Oliveira SL (2014) General solution to Bateman’s differential equations with direct index notation. Int J Pure Appl Math 93:879–883.  https://doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v93i6.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colle R (1999) On the decay corrections for Mixed 95Zr–95Nb sources. Radioact Radiochem 10:12–16Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harms A, Johansson L, MacMahon D (2009) Decay correction of 95Nb. Appl Radiat Isot 67:641–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pomme S, Collins SM (2014) Unbiased equations for 95Zr–95Nb chronometry. Appl Radiat Isot 90:234–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.04.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baratta EJ, Ferri ES (1967) Determination of strontium-90 in human bones by tributyl phosphate. Anal Chem 39(7):846–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benzi P, Operti L, Volpe P (1988) On the reliability of a rapid method for the determination of 90Sr in natural samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 126:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bojanowski R, Knapinska-Skiba D (1990) Determination of low-level 90Sr in environmental materials: a novel approach to the classical method. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 138:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IAEA/AL/088 (1995) Rapid Simultaneous Determination of 89Sr and 90Sr in food and environmental samples by Cerenkov counting. In: Rapid instrumental and separation methods for monitoring radionuclides in food and environmental samples, p 151. Final Report on an IAEA Co-ordinated Research Programme. Vienna, 1995. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/32/065/32065246.pdf?r=1&r=1
  12. 12.
    Heilgeist M (2000) Use of extraction chromatography, ion chromatography and liquid scintillation spectrometry for rapid determination of strontium-89 and strontium-90 in food in cases of increased release of radionuclides. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong KH, Cho YH, Lee MH, Choi GS, Lee CW (2001) Simultaneous measurement of 89Sr and 90Sr in aqueous samples by liquid scintillation counting using the spectrum unfolding method. Appl Radiat Isot 54:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brun S, Bessac S, Uridat D, Boursier B (2002) Rapid method for the determination of radiostrontium in milk. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 253:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maxwell SLIII (2006) Rapid column extraction method for actinides and 89/90 Sr in water samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 267:537–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plionis AA, Gonzales ER, Landsberger S, Peterson DS (2009) Evaluation of flow scintillation analysis for the determination of 90Sr in bioassay samples. Appl Radiat Isot 67:14–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.08.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herranz M, Idoeta R, Legarda F (2011) Analysis of uncertainties and detection limits for the double measurement method of 90Sr and 89Sr. Radiat Meas 46:680–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.06.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang JJ (2013) A quick liquid scintillation counting technique for analysis of 90Sr in environmental samples. Appl Radiat Isot 81:169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.03.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eichrom technologies, LLC (2014) Strontium-89/90 in water. Method No: SRW01Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feuerstein J, Foulyga SF, Galler P, Stingeder G, Prohaska T (2008) Determination of 90Sr in soil samples using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry equipped with dynamic reaction cell (ICP-DRC-MS). J Environ Radioact 99:1764–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.07.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramebäck H, Albinsson Y, Skȧlberg M, Sätmark B, Liljenzin JO (1995) Rapid determination of 90Sr Optimum use of a limited total analysis time. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 357:540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grahek Ž, Karanović G, Nodilo M (2012) Rapid determination of 89,90Sr in wide range of activity concentration by combination of yttrium, strontium separation and Cherenkov counting. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:555–569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1441-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    IAEA/AQ/27 (2013) Rapid simultaneous determination of 89sr and 90Sr in milk: a procedure using Cerenkov and scintillation counting. IAEA Analytical Quality in Nuclear Applications Series No. 27Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    US EPA (2014) Rapid Radiochemical Method for Total Radiostrontium (Sr-90) In Building Materials for Environmental Remediation Following Radiological Incidents. EPA 402-R14-001, Revision 0Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rondahl SH, Tovedal A, Björnham O, Ramebäck H (2017) Time optimization of 90Sr determinations: sequential measurement of multiple samples during decay of 90Y. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311:1143–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-5062-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sáez-Muñoz M, Bagán H, Tarancón A, Garcia JF, Ortiz J, Martorell S (2018) Rapid method for radiostrontium determination in milk in emergency situations using PS resin. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 315:543–555.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5682-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rondahl SH, Ramebäck H (2018) Evaluation of different methods for measuring 89Sr and 90Sr: measurement uncertainty for the different methods as a function of the activity ratio. Appl Radiat Isot 140:87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.06.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply  2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cong Wei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kelly Garnick
    • 1
  • Thomas Scott
    • 1
  • Anthony Wetherby
    • 1
  1. 1.Winchester Engineering and Analytical Center (WEAC), Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA)The US Food and Drug AdministrationWinchesterUSA

Personalised recommendations