Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 321, Issue 3, pp 1081–1091 | Cite as

Distribution of 210Po and 210Pb radionuclides and their dependence on physico-chemical parameters of soil in Madikeri taluk, Coorg district, Karnataka, India

  • M. M. Prakash
  • C. S. KaliprasadEmail author
  • Y. Narayana
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The paper deals with distribution of 210Po and 210Pb radionuclides in a vertical profile of illuviated soil, in Madikeri taluk of Coorg district, Karnataka, India. The activity concentration of 210Po and 210Pb radionuclides was determined using radioanalytical method and the dependence of these radionuclides on physico-chemical parameters of soil was also investigated through a statistical study. In all the layers of the soil in a vertical profile, the 210Po nuclides were found to be in disequilibrium with 210Pb. The frequency distribution of 210Po and 210Pb radionuclides was analysed using Kolgomorov–Smirnov test.

Keywords

210Po 210Pb Coorg Pearson correlation Organic matter Madikeri 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    UNSCEAR (2000) Sources, effects and risk of ionizing radiation. Report to General Assembly, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avadhani DN, Mahesh HM, Karunakara N, Somashekarappa HM, Narayana Y, Siddappa K (2001) Distribution of 210Po and 210Pb in soil samples of Goa, south west coast of India. Radiat Prot Environ 24(1, 2):401–405Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parfenov YD (1974) 210Po in environment and human organism. At Energy Rev 12:75–143Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mithcell N, Perez-Sancez D, Thorne MC (2013) A review of the behaviour of 238U radionuclides in soils and plants. J Radiol Prot 33:17–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wild A (1993) Soils and the environment (an introduction). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mathews KM, Kim CK, Martin P (2007) Determination of 210Po in environmental materials: a review of analytical methodology. Appl Radiat Isot 65:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenbud M (1987) Environmental radioactivity from natural, industrial and military sources, 3rd edn. Academic Press Inc., CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozden B, Ugur A, Esetili T, Esetili BS, Kurucu Y (2013) Assessment of the effects of physical-chemical parameters on 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in cultivated and uncultivated soil from different areas. Geoderma 19:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kharche VK, Sehgal J, Challa O (2000) Characterisation of coffee growing soils in Karnataka. Agropedology 10:59–60Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patil S, Anil KKS (2014) Characterisation and classification of soils of West Coast of Southern Karnataka. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 62(4):408–413Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brady NC, Well RC (2008) The nature and properties of soils, 14th edn. Pearson education Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    EML (1983) In: Volchok HL, de Planque G (eds) Procedure manual, 26th edn. Environment Measurement Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee MH, Lee CW, Boo BH (1997) Distribution and characteristics of 239,240 Pu and 137Cs in soil of Korea. J Environ Radioact 37(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frouin RJ, Raghavan BR, Raman M, Chauhan P, Sunil KB, Shylini SK, Mahendra RS, Nayak SR, Agarwal VK, Kawamura H, Nayak S (2006) Summer chlorophyll—a distribution in Eastern Arabian Sea off Karnataka–Goa coast from satellite and in-situ observations. In: Pan D (ed) Proceedings of SPIE remote sensing of marine environment, pp 6406–6437Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piper CS (2014) Soil and plant analysis (second reprint). Scientific Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carvalho F, Fernandes S, Fesenko S, Holm E, Howard B, Martin P, Phaenuf M, Porcelli D, Prohl G, Twining J (2017) The environmental behaviour of polonium. Technical report series no. 484. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iyengar MAR, Ganapathy S, Kannan SV, Rajan MP, Rajaram S (1990) Procedure manual, workshop on environmental radioactivity held at Kaiga, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prakash MM, Kaliprasad CS, Narayana Y (2018) Studies on distribution of 210Pb in the illuviated soil of Virajpet taluk, Coorg district. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 315:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Narayana Y, Prakash V (2010) Enrichment and vertical profiles of 210Po and 210Pb in monazite areas of coastal Karnataka. Appl Radiat Isot 68(6):1137–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Durrance EM (1986) Radiation in geology. Principle and applications. Ellis Horwood Ltd, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anandaram BN, Manjunath S, Parmesh L, Venkataramaiah P (1998) Study of environmental radioactivity in and around the Shimogha, Karnataka, India—a preliminary report. Radiat Phys Chem 51(617):4–6Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shilpa GM, Anandaram BN, Mohankumari TL (2017) Studies on the distribution of 210Po and 210Pb in the surface soil samples in and around Thirthalli taluk, Karnataka state, India. Current trends in technology and science. ISSN: 2279–0535Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Santos PL, Gouvea RC, Dutta IR, Gouvea VA (1990) Accumulation of 210Po in foodstuffs cultivated in farms around the Brazilian mining and milling facilities on Pocos de Caldas Plateau. J Environ Radioact 11(2):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aguirre MA, Orellana IG, Leon GM (1997) Transfer of natural radionuclides from soils to plants in a marsh enhanced by the operation of non-nuclear industries. J Environ Radioact 35(2):149–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Siddappa K, Balakrishna KM, Radhakrishna AP, Somashekarappa HM, Narayana Y (1994) Distribution of natural and artificial radioactivity components in the environs of coastal Karnataka, Kaiga and Goa. Project report to BRNS, DAE, Mangalore University, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    United states atomic energy commission (1980) 210Po in soils and plants. USAEC special report, vol 11. USAECGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schuttelkopf H, Keifer H (1982) The 226Ra and 210Po concentration of the black forest. Natural radiation environment. In: Vohra KG, Mishra UC, Pillai KC, Sadashivan S (eds) Proceedings 2nd special symposium, Bombay. Wiley Eastern Ltd, New Delhi, pp 194–200Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibrahim SA, Whicker FW (1987) Plant accumulation and plant/soil concentration ratios of 210Po and 210Pb at various sites within a uranium mining and milling operation. Environ Exp Bot 27:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kodaira K, Kato M, Komamura M, Kawamura A, Yamamoto A, Ebisawa R, Sakanoue M, Komura K (1980) Distribution of 210Pb in Japanese soils and its retention to the distributions of strontium-90, cesium-137 and stable 210Pb. In: Gesell TF, Lowder WM (eds) Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on national radiation environment, (NRE-III). Technical Information Centre, United States Department of Energy, pp 611–632Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Radhakrishna AP, Somashekarappa HM, Narayana Y, Siddappa K (1993) A new natural background radiation area on the southwest coast of India. Health Phys 65(4):390–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nagaiah N, Paramesh L, Venkataramaiah P, Raghavayya M (1995) A study of radiation dose due to radon daughters in Mysore city. In: Proceedings of 11th national symposium on radiation physics, (NSRP-11), Patiala, India, pp 115–118Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sethy NK, Sutar AK, Rath P, Jha VN, Ravi PM, Triphathi RM (2015) A review of radiochemical analysis and estimation of 210Po in soil matrices. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8(4):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ugur A, Ozden B, Yener G, Sac MM, Kurucu Y, Altinbas U, Bolca M (2009) Distribution of 210Pb around a uraniferous coal—fired power plant in Western Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 149:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsSarada Vilas CollegeMysoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsB.M.S College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsMangalore UniversityMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations