Advertisement

Trace elements, 210Po and 210Pb in a selection of berries on commercial sale in Italy

  • Maria Assunta Meli
  • Donatella DesideriEmail author
  • Ivan Fagiolino
  • Carla Roselli
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The occurrence of 210Pb, 210Po, trace elements was assessed in a selection of berries on commercial sale in Italy. Data confirmed that berries might serve as an important source of essential elements. The 210Pb, 210Po concentrations found were higher than the reference values reported by UNSCEAR for roots and fruits in the world. There is no risk whatsoever from the intake of toxic elements as Al, As, Cd, Pb, Ni, Hg in berriberries analyzed; it is necessary, however, continuously monitored the levels of these elements to protect consumers against potential adverse health effects especially when consumed in large quantities.

Keywords

Berries 210Po 210Pb Stable elements 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their deep gratitude to Dr. Marco Rocchi for his contribute to statistical analysis.

Funding

Funding was provided by Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo (Grant No. 103),

References

  1. 1.
    Vaaramaa K, Solatie D, Aro L (2009) Distribution of 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in wild berries and mushrooms in boreal forest ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 408:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parfenov Y (1974) Polonium-210 in the environment and in the human organism. At Energy Rev 12:75–143Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown JE, Gjelsvik R, Ross P, Kalas JA, Outola I, Holm E (2011) Levels and transfer of 210Po and 210Pb in Nordic terrestrial ecosystem. J Environ Radiat 102:430–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Persson B, Holm E (2011) Polonium-210 and lead-210 in the terrestrial environment, a historical review. J Environ Radioact 102:420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (1988) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with AnnexesGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ATSDR. US department of health and human services, Agency for toxic substances and disease registry, Toxicological profile for lead. Draft for Public Comment, May 2019 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Almeida Lopes AC, Navas-Acien A, Zamoiski R, Silbergeld EK, Carvalho M, Buzzo ML, Ragassi Urbano M, da Cunha Martins A, Bastos Paoliello MM (2015) Risk factors for lead exposure in adult population in Southern Brazil. J Toxicol Environ Health A 78:92–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodushkin I, Odman F, Holmstrom H (1999) Multi-element analysis of wild berries from northern Sweden by ICP techniques. Sci Total Environ 231:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meli MA, Desideri D, Roselli C, Benedetti C, Feduzi L (2015) Essential and toxic elements in honeys from a region of Central Italy. J Toxicol Environ Health A 78:617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desideri D, Cantaluppi C, Ceccotto F, Meli MA, Roselli C, Feduzi L (2016) Essential and toxic elements in seaweeds for human consumption. J Toxicol Environ Health A 79:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    WHO Fruit and Vegetable Promotion Initiative – report of the meeting, Geneva, 25–27 August 2003Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Quadros APO, Mazzeo DEC, Marin-Morales MA, Perazzo FF, Rosa PCP, Maistro EL (2017) Fruit extract of the medicinal plant Crataegus oxyacanthaexerts genotoxic and mutagenic effects in cultured cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A 80:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeram NP (2010) Recent trends and advances in berry health benefits research. J Agric Food Chem 58:3869–3870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzoni L, Perez-Lopez P, Giampieri F, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Gasparrini M, Forbes-Hernandez TY, Quiles JL, Mezzetti B, Battino M (2016) The genetic aspects of berries: from field to health. J Sci Food Agric 96(2):365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Skrovankova S, Sumczynski D, Mlcek J, Jurikova T, Sochor J (2015) Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int J Mol Sci 16(10):24673–24706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vendrame S, Del Bo C, Ciappellano S, Riso P, Klimis-Zacas D (2016) Berry fruit consumption and metabolic syndrome. Antioxidants 5:34–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girgenti V, Massaglia S, Mosso A, Peano C, Brun F (2016) Exploring perception of raspberry and blueberries by Italian consumers. Sustainability 8:1027–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gwynn JP, Nalbandyan A, Rudolfsen G (2013) 210Po, 210Pb, 40K and 137Cs in edible wild berries and mushrooms and ingestion doses to man from high consumption rates of these wild foods. J Environ Radiat 116:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McDonald P, Jackson D, Leonard DRP, McKay K (1999) An assessment of 210Pb and 210Po terrestrial foodstuffs from regions of potential technological enhancement in England and Wales. J Environ Radioact 43:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryan B, Martin P, Iles M (2005) Uranium series radionuclides in native fruits and vegetables of northern Australia. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 264(2):407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solatie D, Junttila M, Vesterbacka P (2006) 210Po and 210Pb in the food chain lichen-reinder-human. Radiochemistry 48(6):632–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (1996) Method 3050B: acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. Revision 2, December 1996Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meli MA, Fagiolino I, Desideri D, Roselli M (2018) Essential and toxic elements in honeys consumed in Italy. J Toxicol Environ Health A 81:1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2014) Method 6020B (SW-846): inductively coupled-mass spectrometry, Revision 2Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2014) Method 6010D (SW-846): inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry, Revision 4Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (1994) Method 7470A (SW-846): mercury in liquid waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique), Revision 1Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desideri D, Roselli C, Fagiolino I, Meli MA (2018) Toxic elements in human saliva of smokeless tobacco users. J Anal Toxicol 42:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meli MA, Desideri D, Cantaluppi C, Ceccotto F, Feduzi L, Roselli C (2018) Elemental and radiological characterization of commercial Cetraria islandica (L.) Acharius pharmaceutical and food supplementation products. Sci Total Environ 613–614:1566–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA (1996) International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, safety Series No. 115, IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    European of Safety Authority (EFSA) (2006) Scientific committee on food scientific panel on dietetic products, nutrition and allergies. Tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and minerals, February 2006Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    JEFCA (2006) Summary and conclusions of the sixty-seventh meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Rome, 20–29 June 2006Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    WHO (2011) Evaluation of Certain food additives and contaminants. Seventy-second report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Technical Report Series No. 959 Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    WHO (2011) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Seventy-third Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Geneva 2010. WHO Technical Report Series No. 960 Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meli MA, Desideri D, Roselli C, Feduzi L (2014) Assessment of 210Po in Italian diet. Food Chem 155:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Green N, Hammod DJ, Davidson MF, Wilkins BT, Williams B (2002) The radiological impact of naturally occurring radionuclides in foods from the wild. NRPB-W30. National Radiological Protection Board, DidcotGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione ( INRAN) (2013). Carnovale E and Marletta L, Banca Dati di Composizione degli AlimentiGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Varo P, Lahelma O, Nuurtamo M, Saari E, Koiviststoinen P (1980) Mineral element composition of Finnish foods. Potato, vegetables, fruits, berries, nuts and mushrooms. Acta Agric Scand 22:89–113Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barcan VSH, Kovnatsky EF, Smetannikova MS (1998) Absorption of heavy metals in wild berries and edible mushrooms in an area affected by smelter emissions. Water Air Soil Pollut 103(1-4):173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Moilanen M, Fritze H, Nieminen M, Piirainen S, Issakainen J, Piispanen J (2006) Does wood ash application increase heavy metal accumulation in forest berries and mushrooms? For Ecol Manag 226:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Euromonitor International (2017) Global consumer trends survey. London 2017Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ionizing (UNSCEAR) (2000). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation., New York. Report to the General Assembly with Annex, 2000Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2008) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: United Nations (published 2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    European Commission (EC) (2006) Commission Regulation No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomolecular SciencesUrbino University “Carlo Bo”UrbinoItaly
  2. 2.GRUPPO C.S.A. S.p.ARiminiItaly

Personalised recommendations