Assessment of the indoor-to-outdoor ratio of dose rates in and around the historic objects in Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Senada AvdicEmail author
  • Adnan Beganovic
  • Armin Lagumdzija
  • Beco Pehlivanovic
  • Damir Demirovic
  • Irma Kadic


This paper deals with the first study of the indoor to outdoor ambient dose equivalent rates ratio measured in and around the historic objects at various locations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The IndentiFINDER-N spectrometer results showed a positive correlation between the dose rates inside and outside the studied objects while the Radiagem™2000 survey meter indicated larger fluctuations. It was found that the average indoor to outdoor dose rate ratio of 1.2 for the historic objects was close to the ratio for the dwellings made of materials having nearly the same radioactivity content as the surrounding soil.


Natural radioactivity Air dose rate Indoor and outdoor measurements IndentiFINDER-N spectrometer Radiagem™2000 survey meter 



The authors would like thank the Radiation Protection Center-the Institute for Public Health of FB&H, the National Museum of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Museum of Eastern Bosnia for their support during our study as well as to the Tuzla Special Police Unit for its equipment used for the Sicki Kop lake measurements.


  1. 1.
    Target IdentiFINDER User’s Manual (2005) Publication number 1.1. Target systemelectronic gmbhGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Radiagem™2000 Personal Portable Dose Rate and Survey Meter (2011) Canberra.
  3. 3.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Reccommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103, Ann ICRP 37(2–4)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bossew P et al (2017) Estimating the terrestrial gamma dose rate by decomposition of the ambient dose equivalent rate. J Environ Radioact 166:296–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Azmi D (2017) Outdoor dose rate mapping in Kuwait. J Environ Radioact 169–170:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goddard CC (2002) Measurement of outdoor terrestrial gamma radiation in the Sultanate of Oman. Health Phys 82(6):869–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papachristodoulou CA, Patiris DL, Ioannides KG (2010) Exposure to indoor radon and natural gamma radiation in public workplaces in north-western Greece. Radiat Measurement 45:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshimura EM, Otsubo SM, Oliveira RER (2004) Gamma ray contribution to the ambient dose rate in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Radiation Measurement 38:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wissmann F, Saez-Vergara JC (2006) Dosimetry of environmental radiation—a report on the achievements of EURADOS WG3. Radiat Prot Dosim 118(2):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Attix FH (1986) Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. Appendix D.3. Wiley, Hoboken, p 560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abe S, Fujimoto K, Fujitaka K (1984) Relationship between indoor and outdoor gamma ray exposure in wooden houses. Radiat Prot Dosim 7:267–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    UNSCEAR (United National Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2000) Sources and risks of ionizing radiation, report to the general assembly with annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (1988) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 1988 report to the general assembly, with Annexes, United Nations (UN)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karunakara N et al (2014) Assessment of ambient gamma dose rate around a prospective uranium mining area of South India—a comparative study of dose by direct methods and soil radioactivity measurements. Results Phys 4:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of TuzlaTuzlaBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.University Clinical Center SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  3. 3.State Regulatory Agency for Radiation and Nuclear Safety and Security of Bosnia and HerzegovinaSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Educational ScienceUniversity of BihacBihacBosnia and Herzegovina
  5. 5.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of TuzlaTuzlaBosnia and Herzegovina
  6. 6.Institute for Public Health FB&HSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations