Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 319, Issue 1, pp 297–302 | Cite as

Assessment of radioactivity level and associated radiation exposure in topsoil from eastern region of Shangrao Prefecture, China

  • Baolu Yang
  • Qiang Zhou
  • Jing Zhang
  • Zeshu Li
  • Wenhong Li
  • Fei TuoEmail author


Natural and fallout radioactivity were estimated in topsoil samples collected in eastern region of Shangrao Prefecture, China. The average activity concentrations of 238U, 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in the soil were nearly 2 times the world median value and Chinese average. The 137Cs activity concentration decreased compared with the previously reported value in the same region. The absorbed dose rate and annual effective dose rate estimated in the study area are found to be both higher than the world average values. 238U/226Ra and 232Th/226Ra activity ratios were also considered in this study.


Natural radionuclides 137Cs Activity ratios Radiation exposure Soil 



The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this study by the Support Program of Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2014FY211000) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21806156). We also sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Rahman SU, Matiullah Malik F, Rafique M, Anwar J, Ziafat M, Jabbar A (2011) Measurement of naturally occurring/fallout radioactive elements and assessment of annual effective dose in soil samples collected from four districts of the Punjab Province, Pakistan. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 287(2):647–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mehra R, Singh S, Singh K, Sonkawade R (2007) 226Ra, 232Th and 40K analysis in soil samples from some areas of Malwa region, Punjab, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Environ Monit Assess 134:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohanty AK, Sengupta D, Das SK, Saha SK, Van KV (2004) Natural radioactivity and radiation exposure in the high background area at Chhatrapur beach placer deposit of Orissa, India. J Environ Radioact 75(1):15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patra AC, Sahoo SK, Tripathi RM, Puranik VD (2013) Distribution of radionuclides in surface soils, si Singhbhum Shear Zone, India and associated dose. Environ Monit Assess 185(9):7833–7843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohapatra S, Sahoo SK, Dubey JS, Patra AC, Thakur VK, Tripathy SK, Vidyasagar D, Godbole SV, Ravi PM, Tripathi RM (2015) On the radiological assessment of natural and fallout radioactivity in a natural high background radiation area at Odisha, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303(3):2081–2092Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang Z (2002) Natural radiation environment in China. Int Congr 1225:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeng E, Liu X (1988) Analysis of radionuclide in soil of Jiangxi Province. Chin J Radiol Med Prot 8(S2):66–68 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li X, Zheng S, Wu X, Li Y, Sun Y, Yang M, Wang M, Zhang S (1993) Investigation of natural radionuclide contents in soil in Jiangxi Province. Radiat Prot 13(4):291–294 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tuo F, Xu C, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Zhou Q, Li W, Zhang J, Su X (2014) A review of nationwide radioactivity comparisons on gamma-ray spectrometry organized by the NIRP, China. Appl Radiat Isot 87(5):435–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou Q, Wang X, Tuo F, Han Y, Ikeuchi Y, Yang J, Xu C, Zhang J, Li W, Zhang Q, Su X (2015) Intercomparison of γ-spectrometry analysis of radionuclides between china and japan in 2012-2013. Appl Radiat Isot 105:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Navas A, Soto J, Machín J (2002) 238U, 226Ra, 210Pb, 232Th and 40K activities in soil profiles of the Flysch sector (Central Spanish Pyrenees). Appl Radiat Isot 57(4):579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys 48:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IAEA (2004) Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements IAEA TECDOCs-1401. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kekelidze N, Jakhutashvili T, Tutberidze B, Tulashvili E, Akhalkatsishvili M, Mtsariashvili L (2018) Radionuclides in rocks of southern part of Mtskheta-Mtianeti region (Georgia). J Geochem Explor 190:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    OECD (1979) Exposure to radiation from the natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by a group of experts of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Navas A, Gaspar L, López-Vicente M, Machín J (2011) Spatial distribution of natural and artificial radionuclides at the catchment scale (south central pyrenees). Radiat Meas 46(2):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Evans CV, Morton LS, Harbottle G (1997) Pedologic assessment of radionuclide distributions: use of a radio-pedogenic index. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(5):1440–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang SR, Pan JQ, Li YX, Xu CH, Wang X, Lou RH (1988) Distribution and levels of radionuclides in soil in China. Chin J Radiol Med Prot 8(Suppl):1–16 (in Chinese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baolu Yang
    • 1
  • Qiang Zhou
    • 1
  • Jing Zhang
    • 1
  • Zeshu Li
    • 1
  • Wenhong Li
    • 1
  • Fei Tuo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, National Institute for Radiological ProtectionChinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations