Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 318, Issue 1, pp 305–311 | Cite as

A method for measuring radioxenon emanation with cryotrapping and γ spectroscopy

  • M. e Blood
  • S. R. Biegalski
  • D. A. Haas
  • E. J. Artnak
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

A method has been developed to eliminate environmental variables and macroscopic diffusive transport to obtain a direct measurement of radioxenon’s emanation coefficient, K, from a solid matrix. The emanation measurement apparatus (EMA) utilizes neutron activation and a cryotrapping technique with LN2, which increased gas trapping efficiency from 4 ± 3 to 78 ± 7%. Emanation values are measured by γ spectroscopy with a High Purity Germanium detector. Preliminary results from EMA demonstrated the capability of this new process to make reproducable emanation measurements with quantifiable uncertainty. Initial experiments produced U3O8 radioxenon emanation coefficients of 0.016 ± 0.002 for 133Xe and 0.025 ± 0.002 for 135Xe at temperatures ranging from 20 to 80 °C.

Keywords

Radioxenon Cryotrapping Recoil emanation Noble gas transport 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Grant No. HDTRA1-12-1-0009).

References

  1. 1.
    CTBTO Preparatory Commission (2018) The treaty. https://www.ctbto.org/the-treaty/. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    CTBTO Preparatory Commission (2018) Map. https://www.ctbto.org/map. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    Johnson CM (2016) Radioactive xenon and argon production and transport in the environment. University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sivels C, McIntyre J, Bowyer T (2017) A review of the developments of radioxenon detectors for nuclear explosion monitoring. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314:829–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hassan NM, Hosoda M, Ishkawa T et al (2009) Radon migration process and its influence factors. Jpn J Health Phys 44:218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Semkow TM (1990) Recoil-emanation theory applied to radon release from mineral grains. Geochim Coosmochim Acta 54:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robertson JB (1969) Behavior of xenon-133 gas after injection underground: molecular diffusion, materials balance, and barometric pressure effects. Idaho Falls. Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, VAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olsen KB, Kirkham RR, Woods VT et al (2016) Noble gas migration experiment to support the detection of underground nuclear explosions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:2603–2610.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4639-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nazaroff WW (1985) Radon transport from soil to air. Rev Geophys 30:137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferreira A, Lobo L (2008) The sublimation of argon, krypton, and xenon. J Chem Thermodyn 40:1621–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matzke H (1980) Gas release mechanisms in UO2—a critical review. Radiat Eff 53:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blood M (2018) A method for measuring radioxenon emanation with cryotrapping and γ spectroscopy. University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldwin NL, Foushee FC, Greenwood JS (1980) Fission product release from TRIGA-LEU reactor fuels, Report # GA-A--16287. General Atomic Co., San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. e Blood
    • 1
  • S. R. Biegalski
    • 2
  • D. A. Haas
    • 1
  • E. J. Artnak
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear Engineering Teaching LaboratoryThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations