Advertisement

Quantification techniques of mass-separation and ion yield for the detection of radioactive isotopes

  • Michael P. Dion
  • Gregory C. Eiden
  • Orville T. FarmerIII
  • Zach Finch
  • Martin Liezers
  • May-Lin Thomas
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

This research demonstrates two methods of quantifying ion yield efficiency using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer is used as a means of separation where individual decay mass-chains are isolated (i.e., implanted) onto a conductive substrate. Quantifying the ion yield of this recovery process is crucial to understanding the abundance of the separated isotope present in the unseparated starting sample. The first method measured the accumulated charge directly incident on the conductive substrate in real-time while the second method performed a full chemical analysis of the substrate after dissolution. Our previous results demonstrated and compared these quantification methods with a multi-element standard of stable isotopes. This research expands on previous results and utilizes the stable mass ion yield to quantify trace amounts of the (radioactive) isotope of interest present in the sample. The mass-separated radioactive isotopes were fission products produced from thermal neutron irradiation of a highly enriched 235U foil. Five peak-yield mass chains were targeted. The results indicate good correlation between the two methods of measuring the ion yield and imply that coupling this method with traditional radiometric counting can result in an accurate means of quantifying radioactive isotopes. The final results we report here are within 1-sigma of the published cumulative fission yields.

Keywords

Mass-separations Thermal-fission Fission product analysis Cumulative fission yield 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Janet Cloutier for her superb project management support and Larry Greenwood (PNNL), Al Myers (PNNL) and Shannon Morley (PNNL) for the GEA and assistance with data analysis. Furthermore, we are thankful to the radiochemistry team at PNNL for access to the A-sample, LANL for the sample processing and the team at MIT for the irradiation of the HEU foil. This effort was supported by the Nuclear Forensics Division of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and was performed at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, a multi-program national laboratory operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.

References

  1. 1.
    Metz L et al (2013) Fission yield measurements from highly enriched uranium irradiated inside a boron carbide capsule. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:763–767.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2089-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahn B (ed) (2007) Radioanalytical chemistry. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L’Annunziata MF (ed) (2012) Handbook of radioactivity analysis. Academic Press, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (1999) Generic procedures for monitoring in a nuclear or radiological emergency, p 287Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seiner BN et al (2016) Fission product analysis of HEU irradiated within a boron carbide capsule: comparison of detection methodology at PNNL and AWE. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1729–1734.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4395-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morley S et al (2014) Integrated separation scheme for measuring a suite of fission and activation products from a fresh mixed fission and activation product sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 304:509–515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3826-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Budnitz RJ (1974) Strontium-90 and strontium-89: a review of measurement techniques in environmental media. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dion MP et al (2015) Improving alpha spectrometry energy resolution by ion implantation with ICP-MS. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:877–884.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3500-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dion MP et al (2016) Alpha spectrometry applications with mass separated samples. Appl Radiat Isot 107:293–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liezers M et al (2015) The production of ultra-high purity single isotopes or tailored mixtures by ICP-MS. Int J Mass Spectrom 376:58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dion M et al (2016) Mass selective separation applied to radioisotopes of cesium. J Mass Spectrom.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.10.1002/jms.3789 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chadwick MB et al (2011) ENDF/B-VII.1: nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl Data Sheets 112:2887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosman KJR, Taylor PDP (1998) Isotopic compositions of the elements 1997. Pure Appl Chem 70:217–235.  https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199870010217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knoll GF (1979) Radiation detection and measurement. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bevington P (1969) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canberra (2009) Genie™ 2000 3.2 customization tools manual. Canberra Industries, Meriden, p 342Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryRichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations