Journal of Polymer Research

, 26:52 | Cite as

Preparation of konjac glucomannan–borax hydrogels with good self-healing property and pH-responsive behavior

  • Cunzhen Song
  • Yukai Lv
  • Kaiyao Qian
  • Yulong ChenEmail author
  • Xin QianEmail author


In this study, konjac glucomannan (KGM)–sodium tetraborate (borax) hydrogels with good self-healing property and pH-sensitivity were successfully prepared via a simple one-step method. The effects of KGM and borax contents on the morphology, rheological viscoelasticity, mechanical properties and self-healing performance of the hydrogels were systematically investigated. The results of infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope confirmed the generation of boron-oxygen bonds in the hydrogels. The rheological behavior of the hydrogels further revealed that the cross-linking density of the hydrogel system is positively correlated with borax concentration. Due to this fact, the mechanical properties are enhanced with increasing the borax content. For their self-healing performance, we observed that the recovery rate of the tensile strength is significantly faster than that of the elongation rate at break. Particularly, we found that hydrogel with 6 wt% of KGM exhibits the best self-healing performance, i.e., after 5 min of self-healing, the mechanical properties can recover by 95%. Besides, the KGM–borax hydrogels also show a good and recyclable pH-responsive behavior.


Konjac glucomannan Hydrogel Self-healing pH-responsive 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51703198) and the General Scientific Research Project of Department of Education of Zhejiang Province, China (Y201636251).


  1. 1.
    Che Y, Li D, Liu Y, Yue Z, Zhao J, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Tan Y, Yue Q, Meng F (2018) Design and fabrication of a triple-responsive chitosan-based hydrogel with excellent mechanical properties for controlled drug delivery. J Polym Res 25:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wichterle O, Lím D (1960) Hydrophilic Gels for Biological Use. Nature 185:117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narjary B, Aggarwal P, Singh A, Chakraborty D, Singh R (2012). Geoderma 187:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spalding BP, Brooks SC, Watson DB (2010) Hydrogel-Encapsulated Soil: A Tool to Measure Contaminant Attenuation In Situ. Environ Sci Technol 44:3047–3051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X, Chen Q, Lü X (2014) Pectin extracted from apple pomace and citrus peel by subcritical water. Food Hydrocoll 38:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suh JKF, Matthew HWT (2000). Biomaterials 21:2589–2598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ (2008) Cell Encapsulation in Biodegradable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews 14:149–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R (2006) Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology. Adv Mater 18:1345–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li Z, Su Y, Haq MA, Xie B, Wang D (2016) Konjac glucomannan/polyacrylamide bicomponent hydrogels: Self-healing originating from semi-interpenetrating network. Polymer 103:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spoljaric S, Salminen A, Luong ND, Seppälä J (2014) Stable, self-healing hydrogels from nanofibrillated cellulose, poly(vinyl alcohol) and borax via reversible crosslinking. Eur Polym J 56:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zou G, Shen J, Duan P, Xia X, Chen R, Jin B (2018) Temperature-Sensitive Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/Konjac Glucomannan/Graphene Oxide Composite Membranes with Improved Mechanical Property, Swelling Capability, and Degradability. Int J Polym Sci 2018:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurdtabar M, Koutenaee RN, Bardajee GR (2018) Synthesis and characterization of a novel pH-responsive nanocomposite hydrogel based on chitosan for targeted drug release. J Polym Res 25(5):119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao SJ, Wu CD, Nishinari K (2010) J. Appl. Polym. Sci 108:2825–2832Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang H, Ji X, Li Y, Li Z, Tang G, Huang F (2018) An ATP/ATPase responsive supramolecular fluorescent hydrogel constructedviaelectrostatic interactions between poly(sodiump-styrenesulfonate) and a tetraphenylethene derivative. J Mater Chem B 6:2728–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu Y, Lu Q, Yuan S, Zhang R, Wu Z (2017) Properties of Thermoresponsive N-maleyl gelatin-co-P(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel with ultrahigh mechanical strength and self-recovery. J Polym Res 24(11):190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang S, Zhang Z, Chen B, Shao J, Guo Z (2018) Self-healing hydrogel of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphite oxide with pH-sensitive and enhanced thermal properties. J Appl Polym Sci 135:46143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shen C, Li W, Zhang L, Wan C, Gao S (2012) Synthesis of cyanoethyl konjac glucomannan and its liquid crystalline behavior in an ionic liquid. J Polym Res 19(1):9758–9765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khanna S, Tester RF (2006) Influence of purified konjac glucomannan on the gelatinisation and retrogradation properties of maize and potato starches. Food Hydrocoll 20:567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mu RJ, Yuan Y, Wang L, Ni Y, Li M, Chen H, Pang J (2017). Food Hydrocoll 76:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gan L, Shang S, Hu E, Yuen CWM, Jiang SX (2015) Konjac glucomannan/graphene oxide hydrogel with enhanced dyes adsorption capability for methyl blue and methyl orange. Appl Surf Sci 357:866–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen LG, Liu ZL, Zhuo RX (2005) Synthesis and properties of degradable hydrogels of konjac glucomannan grafted acrylic acid for colon-specific drug delivery. Polymer 46:6274–6281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dai YJ, Yan H, Zhang BB, Wu WT, Yang LQ, Li SF, Li WB, Li HT, Yan LL, Shan DX, Feng YJ, Terui N, Tanaka S (2014) J. Appl. Polym. Sci 131:4401–4404Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiao CB, Lu YS, Liu HJ, Zhang L (2015) J. Appl. Polym. Sci 80:26–31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luo X, He P, Lin X (2013) The mechanism of sodium hydroxide solution promoting the gelation of Konjac glucomannan (KGM). Food Hydrocoll 30:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen J, Li J, Li B (2011) Identification of molecular driving forces involved in the gelation of konjac glucomannan: Effect of degree of deacetylation on hydrophobic association. Carbohydr Polym 86:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrington JC, Morris ER (2009) An unusual manifestation of phase separation in mixtures of disordered gelatin with konjac glucomannan. Food Hydrocoll 23:460–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gao S, Guo J, Wu L, Wang S (2008) Gelation of konjac glucomannan crosslinked by organic borate. Carbohydr Polym 73:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pezron E, Ricard A, Leibler L (2010) J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Che 28:2445–2461Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahad E (1974) Differential scanning calorimetry of aqueous polymer solutions and gels. J Appl Polym Sci 18:1587–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Allain C, Salome L (1987) Sol-gel transition of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide + chromium(III): rheological behavior versus crosslink concentration. Macromolecules 20:2957–2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gong J, Yang J, Yuan Y, Wang L, Wu J, Mu R, Hong X, Pang J (2017). Polym Mater Sci Eng 33:69–84Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang L, Jiang Y, Lin Y, Liu X, Pang J (2016) Rheological properties and formation mechanism of DC electric fields induced konjac glucomannan-tungsten gels. Carbohydr Polym 142:293–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wen X, Wang T, Wang Z, Li L, Zhao C (2008) Preparation of konjac glucomannan hydrogels as DNA-controlled release matrix. Int J Biol Macromol 42:256–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manna U, Patil S (2009) Borax Mediated Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of Neutral Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Chitosan. J Phys Chem B 113:9137–9142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gao S, Guo J, Nishinari K (2008) Thermoreversible konjac glucomannan gel crosslinked by borax. Carbohydr Polym 72:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Han J, Lei T, Wu Q (2014) High-water-content mouldable polyvinyl alcohol-borax hydrogels reinforced by well-dispersed cellulose nanoparticles: Dynamic rheological properties and hydrogel formation mechanism. Carbohydr Polym 102:306–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Audebeau E, Oikonomou EK, Norvez S, Iliopoulos I (2014) One-pot synthesis and gelation by borax of glycopolymers in water. Polym Chem-UK 5:2273–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    He L, Szopinski D, Wu Y, Luinstra GA, Theato P (2015) Toward Self-Healing Hydrogels Using One-Pot Thiol–Ene Click and Borax-Diol Chemistry. ACS Macro Lett 4:673–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Phadke A, Zhang C, Arman B, Hsu CC, Mashelkar RA, Lele AK, Tauber MJ, Arya G, Varghese S (2012) Rapid self-healing hydrogels. P Nat Acad Sci USA 109:4383–4388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tuncaboylu DC, Argun A, Algi MP, Okay O (2013) Autonomic self-healing in covalently crosslinked hydrogels containing hydrophobic domains. Polymer 54:6381–6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lu B, Lin F, Jiang X, Cheng J, Lu Q, Song J, Chen C, Huang B (2016) ACS Sustain. Chem E 5:948–956Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Polymer Society, Taipei 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations