Journal of Polymer Research

, 25:243 | Cite as

Configuration of molecular imprinted polymer for electrochemical atrazine detection

  • Abdul Latif Ahmad
  • Nuur Fahanis Che Lah
  • Siew Chun Low


This paper addresses the specific ability of molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs) to bind the template. MIPs for atrazine with various monomer:template and crosslinker:template ratios were prepared using bulk polymerization process. In order to obtain conditions closer to real wastewater test cases, the degree of the imprinting factor by the selection of solvent (methanol and water) was studied and compared. The polymer tested in methanol did not demonstrate good recognition of atrazine. In addition, the imprinting factors increased significantly when the imprinted polymers were tested in water solvent by 45%. Based on Scatchard analysis, the MIP was dependent upon low atrazine concentration (up to 40 mg/L) as the cavities formed in the MIP proved the cavities effects. An electrochemical analysis was done in order to prove that the method can be used as a quantitative analysis of atrazine concentration detection in water solution.


Molecular recognition Pesticide Sensor 



The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia for Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (Grant no: 203/PJKIMIA/6071249).


  1. 1.
    Magos L, Hayes Jr WJ, Laws Jr ER (1992) Handbook of pesticide toxicology volume 1: general principles; volumes 2 and 3: classes of pesticides. Academic press, San Diego, 1991.1576 pp., $395.00. J Appl Toxicol 12(1):75–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barr DB, Needham LL (2002) Analytical methods for biological monitoring of exposure to pesticides: a review. J Chromatogr B 778(1-2):5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albanis TA, Hela D, Papakostas G, Goutner V (1996) Concentration and bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticide residues in herons and their prey in wetlands of Thermaikos gulf, Macedonia, Greece. Sci Total Environ 182(1–3):11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgå K, Gabrielsen GW, Skaare JU (2001) Biomagnification of organochlorines along a Barents Sea food chain. Environ Pollut 113(2):187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nendza M, Herbst T, Kussatz C, Gies A (1997) Potential for secondary poisoning and biomagnification in marine organisms. Chemosphere 35(9):1875–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niethammer K et al (1984) Presence and biomagnification of organochlorine chemical residues in oxbow lakes of Northeastern Louisiana. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 13(1):63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strandberg B et al (1998) Concentrations, biomagnification and spatial variation of organochlorine compounds in a pelagic food web in the northern part of the Baltic Sea. Sci Total Environ 217(1–2):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strandberg B, Strandberg L, Bergqvist PA, Falandysz J, Rappe C (1998) Concentrations and biomagnification of 17 chlordane compounds and other organochlorines in harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) and herring from the Southern Baltic Sea. Chemosphere 37(9–12):2513–2523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moh H, Tan IA, Lim LL (2013) Removal of atrazine from water using oil palm Shell based adsorbents: equilibrium and kinetic study. J Civ Eng Sci Technol 4(2):18–23Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salman JM, Njoku VO, Hameed BH (2011) Batch and fixed-bed adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid onto oil palm frond activated carbon. Chem Eng J 174(1):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curran W (1998) Persistence of herbicides in soil, agronomy facts 36. Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hennion MC, Barcelo D (1998) Strengths and limitations of immunoassays for effective and efficient use for pesticide analysis in water samples: a review. Anal Chim Acta 362(1):3–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zahedi P, Ziaee M, Abdouss M, Farazin A, Mizaikoff B (2016) Biomacromolecule template-based molecularly imprinted polymers with an emphasis on their synthesis strategies: a review. Polym Adv Technol 27(9):1124–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kryscio DR, Peppas NA (2012) Critical review and perspective of macromolecularly imprinted polymers. Acta Biomater 8(2):461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pardieu E, Cheap H, Vedrine C, Lazerges M, Lattach Y, Garnier F, Remita S, Pernelle C (2009) Molecularly imprinted conducting polymer based electrochemical sensor for detection of atrazine. Anal Chim Acta 649(2):236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen J, Bai L, Tian M, Zhou X, Zhang Y (2014) Hollow-fiber membrane tube embedded with a molecularly imprinted monolithic bar for the microextraction of triazine pesticides. Anal Methods 6(2):602–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ashrafian S, Ataei SA, Jahanshahi M (2016) Novel composite membranes embedded with molecularly imprinted porous polymeric nanospheres for targeted phenol. Polym Adv Technol 27(6):789–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicolescu T-V, Sarbu A, Ovidiu Dima S, Nicolae C, Donescu D (2013) Molecularly imprinted “bulk” copolymers as selective sorbents for gallic acid. J Appl Polym Sci 127(1):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu X, Su Q, Cai J, Yang J, Gao Y (2006) Molecularly imprinted polymer membranes for substance-selective solid-phase extraction from aqueous solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 101(6):4468–4473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kueseng P, Noir ML, Mattiasson B, Thavarungkul P, Kanatharana P (2009) Molecularly imprinted polymer for analysis of trace atrazine herbicide in water. J Environ Sci Health B 44(8):772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wulff G (1995) Molecular imprinting in cross-linked materials with the aid of molecular templates— a way towards artificial antibodies. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 34(17):1812–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sergeyeva TA, Piletsky SA, Brovko AA, Slinchenko EA, Sergeeva LM, el'skaya AV (1999) Selective recognition of atrazine by molecularly imprinted polymer membranes. Development of conductometric sensor for herbicides detection. Anal Chim Acta 392(2):105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andersson HS, Karlsson JG, Piletsky SA, Koch-Schmidt AC, Mosbach K, Nicholls IA (1999) Study of the nature of recognition in molecularly imprinted polymers, II [1]: influence of monomer-template ratio and sample load on retention and selectivity. J Chromatogr A 848(1–2):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baggiani C, Giovannoli C, Anfossi L, Passini C, Baravalle P, Giraudi G (2012) A connection between the binding properties of imprinted and nonimprinted polymers: a change of perspective in molecular imprinting. J Am Chem Soc 134(3):1513–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nicholls IA, Andersson HS, Golker K, Henschel H, Karlsson BCG, Olsson GD, Rosengren AM, Shoravi S, Suriyanarayanan S, Wiklander JG, Wikman S (2011) Rational design of biomimetic molecularly imprinted materials: theoretical and computational strategies for guiding nanoscale structured polymer development. Anal Bioanal Chem 400(6):1771–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    He J-f, Zhu Q-h, Deng Q-y (2007) Investigation of imprinting parameters and their recognition nature for quinine-molecularly imprinted polymers. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 67(5):1297–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Renkecz T, László K, Horváth V (2014) Molecularly imprinted microspheres prepared by precipitation polymerization at high monomer concentrations. Molecular Imprinting 2:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Downey JS, Frank RS, Li WH, Stöver HDH (1999) Growth mechanism of poly (divinylbenzene) microspheres in precipitation polymerization. Macromolecules 32(9):2838–2844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li K, Stöver HDH (1993) Synthesis of monodisperse poly (divinylbenzene) microspheres. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 31(13):3257–3263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Giannetto M, Umiltà E, Careri M (2014) New competitive dendrimer-based and highly selective immunosensor for determination of atrazine in environmental, feed and food samples: the importance of antibody selectivity for discrimination among related triazinic metabolites. Anal Chim Acta 806:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kabiri K, Omidian H, Hashemi SA, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ (2003) Synthesis of fast-swelling superabsorbent hydrogels: effect of crosslinker type and concentration on porosity and absorption rate. Eur Polym J 39(7):1341–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Golker K, Nicholls IA (2016) The effect of crosslinking density on molecularly imprinted polymer morphology and recognition. Eur Polym J 75:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu S, Li J, Chen L (2011) Molecularly imprinted polymers by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer precipitation polymerization for preconcentration of atrazine in food matrices. Talanta 85(1):282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ang QY, Low SC (2015) Morphology and kinetic modeling of molecularly imprinted organosilanol polymer matrix for specific uptake of creatinine. Anal Bioanal Chem 407(22):6747–6758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li P, Rong F, Yuan C (2003) Morphologies and binding characteristics of molecularly imprinted polymers prepared by precipitation polymerization. Polym Int 52(12):1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Clegg LS, Lindup WE (1984) Scatchard plots with a positive slope: dependence upon ligand concentration. J Pharm Pharmacol 36(11):776–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ang QY, Zolkeflay MH, Low SC (2016) Configuration control on the shape memory stiffness of molecularly imprinted polymer for specific uptake of creatinine. Appl Surf Sci 369:326–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vendamme R, Eevers W, Kaneto M, Minamizaki Y (2009) Influence of polymer morphology on the capacity of molecularly imprinted resins to release or to retain their template. Polym J 41(12):1055–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Syu M-J, Deng J-H, Nian Y-M (2004) Towards bilirubin imprinted poly (methacrylic acid-co-ethylene glycol dimethylacrylate) for the specific binding of α-bilirubin. Anal Chim Acta 504(1):167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations