Advertisement

Journal of Polymer Research

, 25:198 | Cite as

Study of phase separation in blends of silk fibroin and sodium alginate in solution and in solid state

  • Laise Maia Lopes
  • Mariana Agostini de Moraes
  • Marisa Masumi Beppu
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Silk fibroin (SF) and sodium alginate (SA) are natural polymers with many applications as biomaterials. It is possible to make blends with them in order to improve their properties. Those blends are partially miscible; therefore, understanding the mechanism and phase equilibrium of this system is important to better understand the interaction between these natural polymers. This work analyzed the mechanism of phase separation of SF and SA blends with different composition in solution and in the solid state (as membranes) using small angle light scattering with a He-Ne laser. Polymer interaction and conformation were investigated by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and membrane morphology was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM images showed interpenetrated globules in the matrix. Light scattering profile for blends in solution and in the solid state showed a peak of intensity suggesting that phase separation occurs by spinodal decomposition.

Keywords

Biopolymers Phase separation Thermodynamic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all financial institutions that supported this work. This project was supported by Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES - 33003017034P8) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - 476046/2012-2).

Supplementary material

10965_2018_1594_MOESM1_ESM.docx (7.2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 7414 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Inoue T (2002) Polymer Blends Handbook. Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calamak S, Erdoğdu C, Ozalp M, Ulubayram K (2014) Silk fibroin based antibacterial bionanotextiles as wound dressing materials. Mater Sci Eng C 43:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kundu B, Rajkhowa R, Kundu SC, Wang X (2013) Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sohn S, Strey HH, Gido SP (2004) Phase behavior and hydration of silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules 5:751–757.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0343693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nogueira GM, De Moraes MA, Rodas ACD et al (2011) Hydrogels from silk fibroin metastable solution: formation and characterization from a biomaterial perspective. Mater Sci Eng C 31:997–1001.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2011.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang H, Liu X, Yang M, Zhu L (2015) Silk fibroin/sodium alginate composite nano-fibrous scaffold prepared through thermally induced phase-separation (TIPS) method for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 55:8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Moraes MA, Silva MF, Weska RF, Beppu MM (2014) Silk fibroin and sodium alginate blend: miscibility and physical characteristics. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 40:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.047 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agulhon P, Robitzer M, Habas J-P, Quignard F (2014) Influence of both cation and alginate nature on the rheological behavior of transition metal alginate gels. Carbohydr Polym 112:525–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roh DH, Kang SY, Kim JY, Kwon YB, Young Kweon H, Lee KG, Park YH, Baek RM, Heo CY, Choe J, Lee JH (2006) Wound healing effect of silk fibroin/alginate-blended sponge in full thickness skin defect of rat. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:547–552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-8938-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srisuwan Y, Baimark Y (2013) Preparation of Biodegradable Silk Fibroin/Alginate Blend Films for Controlled Release of Antimicrobial Drugs Adv Mater Sci Eng 2013:Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mession JL, Assifaoui A, Lafarge C et al (2012) Protein aggregation induced by phase separation in a pea proteins-sodium alginate-water ternary system. Food Hydrocoll 28:333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pacek AW, Ding P, Nienow AW, Wedd M (2000) Phase separation and drop size distributions in “homogeneous”. Na-alginate/Na-caseinate mixtures 42:401–409Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inoue T, Nunes SP (1996) Evidence for spinodal decomposition and nucleation and growth mechanisms during membrane formation. J Memb Sci 111:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsumoto A, Chen J, Collette AL, Kim UJ, Altman GH, Cebe P, Kaplan DL (2006) Mechanisms of silk fibroin sol-gel transitions. J Phys Chem B 110:21630–21638.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056350v CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bragg JC, Kweon H, Jo Y, Lee KG, Lin CC (2016) Modulating properties of chemically crosslinked PEG hydrogels via physical entrapment of silk fibroin. J Appl Polym Sci 133:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin H-J, Kaplan DL (2003) Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 424:1057–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01809 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Antonov YA, Moldenaers P (2011) Structure formation and phase-separation behaviour of aqueous casein-alginate emulsions in the presence of strong polyelectrolyte. Food Hydrocoll 25:350–360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liang CX, Hirabayashi K (1992) Improvements of the physical properties of fibroin membranes with sodium alginate. J Appl Polym Sci 45:1937–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magoshi J, Magoshi Y, Nakamura S, Kasai N, Kakudo M (1977) Physical properties and structure of silk. V Thermal behavior of silk fibroin in the random-coil conformation J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 15:1675–1683.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1977.180150915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Motta A, Fambri L, Migliaresi C (2002) Regenerated silk fibroin films: thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis. Macromol Chem Phys 203:1658–1665.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3935(200207)203:10/11<1658::AID-MACP1658>3.0.CO;2-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan Q, Yao J, Huang L, Chen X, Shao Z (2010) Correlation between structural and dynamic mechanical transitions of regenerated silk fibroin. Polymer (Guildf) 51:6278–6283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agarwal N, Hoagland DA, Farris RJ (1997) Effect of moisture absorption on the thermal properties of Bombyx mori silk fibroin films. J Appl Polym Sci 63:401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970118)63:3<401::AID-APP17>3.3.CO;2-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brostow W, Chiu R, Kalogeras IM, Vassilikou-Dova A (2008) Prediction of glass transition temperatures: binary blends and copolymers. Mater Lett 62:3152–3155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Utracki L (1985) Glass transition temperature in polymer blends. Adv Polym Technol 5:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.1985.060050105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee KG, Kweon H, Yeo JH, Woo SO, Lee JH, Hwan Park Y (2004) Structural and physical properties of silk fibroin/alginate blend sponges. J Appl Polym Sci 93:2174–2179.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ming J, Zuo B (2014) A novel silk fibroin/sodium alginate hybrid scaffolds. Polym Eng Sci 54:129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringFederal University of São PauloDiademaBrazil

Personalised recommendations