Advertisement

Effects of the total content of eutectic Sn-Cu alloy and Cu particles used as conductive filler on the structure and properties of polyamide-66 composites

  • Honglei Xia
  • Mingjing Zou
  • Yajie Lei
  • Jiangping He
  • Fengshun Zhang
  • Tao Liu
  • Ming Li
  • Dongcheng Liang
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Incorporating both a low-melting-point metal (LMPM) and a high-melting-point metal (HMPM) into a polymer is a promising approach to prepare highly conductive, melt-processable composites. The effects of the total content of the two metals on the structure and properties of the composites were studied in this work through a eutectic Sn-Cu alloy/Cu particles/polyamide-66 ternary system. The structure, conductivity, fluidity and toughness of the composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, four-point probe or two-electrode method, small amplitude oscillatory shear testing and Charpy impact testing, respectively. The results show that the morphology of metal phase in the composites transforms from isolated “islands” to a physically continuous network as the total metal content increases. The percolation threshold for the composites is lower than that of traditional metal-filled polymer composites. The complex viscosity and impact strength of the composites vary non-monotonically with the total metal content and exhibit a minimum. The enhancement in the conductivity and toughness of the composites is related to the formation of the physically continuous conductive network. Overall, the filler content dependences of the structure and properties of the LMPM/HMPM/polymer composites are different from those of traditional conductive polymer composites. The combination of LMPM and HMPM helps reduce the filler content and mitigate the composite fluidity deterioration.

Keywords

Conductive polymer composites Structure Conductivity Fluidity Toughness Low-melting-point metal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 51073143). Sun Suming, Xu Xiang, Wang Xianzhong and Liu Tianli were acknowledged for their help in the experimental work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Deng H, Lin L, Ji M, Zhang S, Yang M, Fu Q (2014) Progress on the morphological control of conductive network in conductive polymer composites and the use as electroactive multifunctional materials. Prog Polym Sci 39:627–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pang H, Xu L, Yan D, Li Z (2014) Conductive polymer composites with segregated structures. Prog Polym Sci 39:1908–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang H, Zheng K, Zhang X, Ding X, Zhang ZX, Bao C, Guo L, Chen L, Tian XY (2016) 3D network porous polymeric composites with outstanding electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Sci Technol 125:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G, Barwich S, Charifou R, Harvey A, Backes C, Li Z, Ferreira MS, Mobius ME (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Science 354:1257–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feller JF, Roth S (2006) Conductive polymer composites: electrical, thermal and rheological study of poly(propylene)/long stainless-steel fibers for electromagnetic interferences shielding. J Appl Polym Sci 100:3280–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu G, Zhao C, Zhang SM, Yang MS, Wang ZG (2006) Low percolation thresholds of electrical conductivity and rheology in poly(ethylene terephthalate) through the networks of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymer 47:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Song J, Zhang W, Yang W, Xu J, Lai J (2014) Rheological properties, morphology, mechanical properties, electrical resistivity and EMI SE of cyclic butylene terephthalate/graphite/carbon black composites. J Polym Res 21:556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zebarjad SM, Tahani M, Sajjadi SA (2004) Influence of filler particles on deformation and fracture mechanism of isotactic polypropylene. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1459–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gong T, Peng SP, Bao RY, Yang W (2016) Low percolation threshold and balanced electrical and mechanical performances in polypropylene/carbon black composites with a continuous segregated structure. Compos Part B 99:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang X, Pan Y, Cheng J, Yi XS (2000) The influence of low-melting-point alloy on the rheological properties of a polystyrene melt. J Mater Sci 35:4573–4581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang G, Liu T, Liu X, Yi Y, Liu L, Tan X, Luo J, He J, Ma H, Lu A, Deng Z, Shu Y (2014) The processing behavior of liquid Sn/molten PE during internal mixing. Int Polym Process 29:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mrozek RA, Cole PJ, Mondy LA, Rao RR, Bieg LF, Lenhart JL (2010) Highly conductive, melt processable polymer composites based on nickel and low melting eutectic metal. Polymer 51:2954–2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zou M, He J, Lei Y, Zhang F, Zhao Q, Liu T, Ma H, Yi Y (2016) Effect of the eutectic Sn-cu alloy-to-cu content ratio on the structure and properties of conductive polyamide-66 composites. Compos Sci Technol 133:200–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tu KN (2007) Solder joint technology, chapter 2: copper-tin reactions in bulk samples. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu M, Liu H, Zhao H, Li W (2013) How to decrease the viscosity of suspension with the second fluid and nanoparticles? Sci Rep 3:3137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Favis BD, Chaiifoux JP (1988) Influence of composition on the morphology of polypropylene/polycarbonate blends. Polymer 29:1761–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun X, Gong T, Pu J, Bao R, Xie B, Yang M, Yang W (2017) Effect of phase coarsening under melt annealing on the electrical performance of polymer composites with a double percolation structure. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gong T, Liu M, Liu H, Peng S, Li T, Bao R, Yang W, Xie B, Yang M, Guo Z (2017) Selective distribution and migration of carbon nanotubes enhanced electrical and mechanical performances in polyolefin elastomers. Polymer 110:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balberg I (1987) Recent developments in continuum percolation. Philos Mag B 56:991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyer KA, Torkelson JM (2014) Green composites of polypropylene and eggshell: effective biofiller size reduction and dispersion by single-step processing with solid-state shear pulverization. Compos Sci Technol 102:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rusu M, Sofian N, Rusu D (2001) Mechanical and thermal properties of zinc powder filled high density polyethylene composites. Polym Test 20:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fu S, Feng X, Lauke B, Mai Y (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B 39:933–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ali B, Sabri MF, Said SM (2017) Microstructural modification of Sn-0.7Cu solder alloys by Fe/bi-addition for achieving high mechanical performance. J Electron Mater 46:4755–4764CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemical MaterialsChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Material Science and EngineeringSouthwest University of Science and TechnologyMianyangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Metrology and Testing Center of China Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations