Advertisement

Informant Discrepancies in Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in an At-Risk Sample: The Role of Parenting and School Engagement

  • Alexa L. CurhanEmail author
  • Jill A. Rabinowitz
  • Elise T. Pas
  • Catherine P. Bradshaw
Empirical Research

Abstract

A number of studies have used variable-centered approaches to examine informant discrepancies on children’s behavior problems; however, few such studies have used person-centered approaches to explore patterns of informant discrepancies or correlates of discrepancies in informant symptom ratings. The present study addressed these gaps by examining profiles of informant agreement on internalizing and externalizing symptoms and examining whether two important contextual factors, parenting and school engagement, are associated with profile membership. Data from an at-risk, urban sample of youth participants (N= 346, M age = 12.47 ± 0.60 years, 56% male, and 75% Black), their caregivers, and one of their teachers were analyzed in the current study. Youth from 20 schools in a Mid-Atlantic state were screened for elevated levels of aggression and were selected to participate in the Early Adolescent Coping Power study. At baseline, youth, caregivers, and teachers reported on youth’s internalizing symptoms and caregivers and teachers reported on youth’s externalizing symptoms. Caregivers reported on their parenting; youth reported on their school engagement. Two internalizing symptoms profiles were identified: Low Symptoms Agreement and Youth-Reported High Somatization and Anxiety. Three externalizing symptoms profiles were identified: Low Symptoms Agreement, Teacher-Reported High Externalizing, and Caregiver-Reported High Externalizing. These profiles differed significantly on parenting behaviors and school engagement, shedding light on factors that may underlie informant discrepancies.

Keywords

Internalizing symptoms Externalizing symptoms Multiple informants Person-centered approach Parenting School engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A140070 (PI: C. Bradshaw) to the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. John Lochman who is a Co-PI on the grant and supported the data collection for this study.

Authors’ Contributions

A.C. developed the research questions, led the writing of the manuscript, assisted with conducting the analyses, and interpreting the results; J.R. conducted the primary analyses and provided writing and editing assistance; E.P. led the collection of data, oversaw the data analysis and interpretation, and provided guidance on the research framing and writing; C.B. conceived of and supervised the study as the principal investigator on the grant supporting the researchers’ time on this project and assisted in framing and editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at the University of Virginia (IRB#2014-0247-00) and the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (IRB #5807) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10964_2019_1107_MOESM1_ESM.docx (44 kb)
Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Ghriwati, N., Winter, M. A., Greenlee, J. L., & Thompson, E. L. (2018). Discrepancies between parent and self-reports of adolescent psychosocial symptoms: associations with family conflict and asthma outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(7), 992–997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, L. A., McKnight, P. E., Disabato, D. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2017). When and how to use multiple informants to improve clinical assessments. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39(4), 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balan, R., Dobrean, A., Roman, G. D., & Balazsi, R. (2017). Indirect effects of parenting practices on internalizing problems among adolescents: the role of expressive suppression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(1), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2010). Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(4), 717–735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, C. P., Lochman, J., Powell, N., & Ialongo, N. (2017). Preventing bullying in middle schoolers by using the coping power program: a targeted group intervention. In C. P. Coping (Ed.) Handbook on bullying prevention: a lifecourse perspective (pp. 215–220). New York, NY: National Association of Social Workers Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., Debnam, K. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2014). Measuring school climate in high schools: a focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of School Health, 84(9), 593–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., Jacquez, F. M., Tram, J. M., Zelkowitz, R., Nick, E. A., & Rights, J. D. (2017). Time-varying and time-invariant dimensions of depression in children and adolescents: Implications for cross-informant agreement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(5), 635–651.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2004). Measuring informant discrepancies in clinical child research. Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 330–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 483–509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgers, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858–900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. De Los Reyes, A., Cook, C. R., Gresham, F. M., Makol, B. A., & Wang, M. (2019a). Informant discrepancies in assessments of psychosocial functioning in school-based services and research: Review and directions for future research. Journal of School Psychology, 74, 74–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Los Reyes, A., Ohannessian, C. M., & Racz, S. J. (2019b). Discrepancies between adolescent and parent reports about family relationships. Child Development Perspectives, 13, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dirks, M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Briggs-Gowan, M., Cella, D., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2012). Annual research review: embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior–theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 53(5), 558–574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T. L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., & Liew, J. (2005). Relations among positive parenting, children’s effortful control, and externalizing problems: A three-wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 76(5), 1055–1071.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2010). Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1159–1175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Goolsby, J., Rich, B. A., Hinnant, B., Habayeb, S., Berghorst, L., De Los Reyes, A., & Alvord, M. K. (2018). Parent–child informant discrepancy is associated with poorer treatment outcome. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 1228–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2002). Issues in parent-child agreement: the case of structured diagnostic interviews. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(1), 57–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurd, N. M., Hussain, S., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2018). School disorder, school connectedness, and psychosocial outcomes: moderation by a supportive figure in the school. Youth & Society, 50(3), 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurley, K. D., Huscroft-D’Angelo, J., Trout, A., Griffith, A., & Epstein, M. (2014). Assessing parenting skills and attitudes: A review of the psychometrics of parenting measures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(5), 812–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  24. Ines, T. M., & Sacco, W. P. (1992). Factors related to correspondence between teacher ratings of elementary student depression and student self-ratings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 140–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. King, S. M., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2004). Childhood externalizing and internalizing psychopathology in the prediction of early substance use. Addiction, 99(12), 1548–1559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolko, D. J., & Kazdin, A. E. (1993). Emotional/behavioral problems in clinic and nonclinic children: correspondence among child, parent and teacher reports. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(6), 991–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Laursen, B. P., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lionetti, F., Palladino, B. E., Moses Passini, C., Casonato, M., Hamzallari, O., Ranta, M., Dellagiulia, A., & Keijsers, L. (2018). The development of parental monitoring during adolescence: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 552–580.Google Scholar
  29. Lippold, M. A., Glatz, T., Fosco, G. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2018). Parental perceived control and social support: linkages to change in parenting behaviors during early adolescence. Family Process, 57(2), 432–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lochman, J. E. (1995). Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. The conduct problems prevention research group. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(4), 549–559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture model. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods: statistical analysis (pp. 551–611). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McLeod, B. D., Weisz, J. R., & Wood, J. J. (2007). Examining the association between parenting and childhood depression: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 986–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth Edition Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  34. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development over the life course. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of latent classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olino, T. M., & Klein, D. N. (2015). Psychometric comparison of self-and informant-reports of personality. Assessment, 22(6), 655–664.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: an updated meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873–932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Racz, S. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2011). The relationship between parental knowledge and monitoring and child and adolescent conduct problems: a 10-year update. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(4), 377–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramaswamy, V., Desarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2002). The clinician’s guide to the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  41. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children, second edition manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  42. Rolland, R. G. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: a meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 396–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roskam, I. (2018). The clinical significance of informant agreement in externalizing behavior from Age 3 to 14. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(4), 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scaramella, L. V., & Leve, L. D. (2004). Clarifying parent-child reciprocities during early childhood: the early childhood coercion model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7(2), 89–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootten, J. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(3), 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sinclair, S. M., Schmidt, F., Kowatch, K. R., & Mushquash, C. J. (2019). Mental health cross-informant agreement for indigenous and non-indigenous adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 906–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Totura, C. M. W., Green, A. E., Karver, M. S., & Gesten, E. L. (2009). Multiple informants in the assessment of psychological, behavioral, and academic correlates of bullying and victimization in middle school. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Heel, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., Bijttebier, P., Colpin, H., Goossens, L., Verschueren, K., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2019). Parenting and externalizing problem behavior in adolescence: Combining the strengths of variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 653–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeguez, C. E., & Sibley, M. H. (2016). Predictors of informant discrepancies between mother and middle school teacher ADHD ratings. School Mental Health, 8(4), 452–460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Zlomke, K. R., Lamport, D., Bauman, S., Garland, B., & Talbot, B. (2014). Parenting adolescents: examining the factor structure of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire for adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(8), 1484–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mental HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.University of Virginia, Curry School of Education and Human DevelopmentCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations