Informant Discrepancies in Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in an At-Risk Sample: The Role of Parenting and School Engagement
A number of studies have used variable-centered approaches to examine informant discrepancies on children’s behavior problems; however, few such studies have used person-centered approaches to explore patterns of informant discrepancies or correlates of discrepancies in informant symptom ratings. The present study addressed these gaps by examining profiles of informant agreement on internalizing and externalizing symptoms and examining whether two important contextual factors, parenting and school engagement, are associated with profile membership. Data from an at-risk, urban sample of youth participants (N= 346, M age = 12.47 ± 0.60 years, 56% male, and 75% Black), their caregivers, and one of their teachers were analyzed in the current study. Youth from 20 schools in a Mid-Atlantic state were screened for elevated levels of aggression and were selected to participate in the Early Adolescent Coping Power study. At baseline, youth, caregivers, and teachers reported on youth’s internalizing symptoms and caregivers and teachers reported on youth’s externalizing symptoms. Caregivers reported on their parenting; youth reported on their school engagement. Two internalizing symptoms profiles were identified: Low Symptoms Agreement and Youth-Reported High Somatization and Anxiety. Three externalizing symptoms profiles were identified: Low Symptoms Agreement, Teacher-Reported High Externalizing, and Caregiver-Reported High Externalizing. These profiles differed significantly on parenting behaviors and school engagement, shedding light on factors that may underlie informant discrepancies.
KeywordsInternalizing symptoms Externalizing symptoms Multiple informants Person-centered approach Parenting School engagement
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A140070 (PI: C. Bradshaw) to the University of Virginia. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. John Lochman who is a Co-PI on the grant and supported the data collection for this study.
A.C. developed the research questions, led the writing of the manuscript, assisted with conducting the analyses, and interpreting the results; J.R. conducted the primary analyses and provided writing and editing assistance; E.P. led the collection of data, oversaw the data analysis and interpretation, and provided guidance on the research framing and writing; C.B. conceived of and supervised the study as the principal investigator on the grant supporting the researchers’ time on this project and assisted in framing and editing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Data Sharing and Declaration
This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at the University of Virginia (IRB#2014-0247-00) and the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (IRB #5807) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bradshaw, C. P., Lochman, J., Powell, N., & Ialongo, N. (2017). Preventing bullying in middle schoolers by using the coping power program: a targeted group intervention. In C. P. Coping (Ed.) Handbook on bullying prevention: a lifecourse perspective (pp. 215–220). New York, NY: National Association of Social Workers Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cole, D. A., Martin, J. M., Jacquez, F. M., Tram, J. M., Zelkowitz, R., Nick, E. A., & Rights, J. D. (2017). Time-varying and time-invariant dimensions of depression in children and adolescents: Implications for cross-informant agreement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(5), 635–651.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Dirks, M. A., De Los Reyes, A., Briggs-Gowan, M., Cella, D., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2012). Annual research review: embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior–theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 53(5), 558–574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2010). Trajectories of pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems from age 2 to age 12: findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1159–1175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Lionetti, F., Palladino, B. E., Moses Passini, C., Casonato, M., Hamzallari, O., Ranta, M., Dellagiulia, A., & Keijsers, L. (2018). The development of parental monitoring during adolescence: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 552–580.Google Scholar
- Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture model. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods: statistical analysis (pp. 551–611). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth Edition Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2002). The clinician’s guide to the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children, second edition manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Van Heel, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., Bijttebier, P., Colpin, H., Goossens, L., Verschueren, K., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2019). Parenting and externalizing problem behavior in adolescence: Combining the strengths of variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 653–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar