Advertisement

Comparisons of Types of Exposure to Violence Within and Across Contexts in Predicting the Perpetration of Dating Aggression

  • Hans Saint-Eloi CadelyEmail author
  • Sylvie Mrug
  • Michael Windle
Empirical Research
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

It is widely accepted that adolescents exposed to violence are more likely to become perpetrators of dating aggression. However, it remains unclear whether the effects of exposure to violence on later perpetration of dating aggression vary based on the nature of the violence exposure (e.g., witnessing versus being a victim) and the contexts of exposure to violence. Thus, the relationships between two types of exposure to violence (witnessing and victimization) in early adolescence and perpetrating dating aggression in late adolescence were compared within and across three social contexts: the home, the community, and the school. Participants included 484 youth (51% females; 81% African–Americans, 18% European–Americans, 1% Hispanic or Other). Information on exposure to violence were collected at Waves 1 and 2 during early adolescence (Wave 1: M = 11.8 years old; Wave 2: M = 13.2 years old) and dating aggression data were collected during late adolescence (Wave 3: M = 18.0 years old). The results showed that across all contexts witnessing violence was a more consistent predictor of later dating aggression relative to victimization. Being exposed to violence in the home either via observation or victimization was a stronger predictor of physical dating aggression and threatening behaviors compared to being exposed to violence in the school. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the roles of various forms of exposure to violence during early adolescence in perpetrating dating aggression later in the life course.

Keywords

Adolescence Dating aggression Exposure to violence Witnessing Victimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants K01DA024700 from the National Institutes of Health to S.M. and R49-CCR418569 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to M.W.

Authors’ Contributions

H.S.C. conceived of the study, participated in its’ design and coordination and drafted the manuscript; S.M. participated in the design and interpretation of the data; M.W. participated in the design and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants K01DA024700 from the National Institutes of Health to S.M. and R49-CCR418569 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to M.W.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The data that support the findings of this study are available from S.M. but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. However, data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from S.M.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. No identifiable information from participants were included in the manuscript.

References

  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnyard, V. L., & Cross, C. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence: Understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14, 998–1013.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208322058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, B. M., Chido, L. M., Preble, K. M., Weisz, A. N., Yoon, J. S., Delaney-Black, V., Kernsmith, P., & Lewandowski, L. (2015). Violence exposure and teen dating violence among African American youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(12), 2174–2195.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Wanner, B. (2002). Parent and peer effects on delinquency-related violence and dating violence: a test of two mediational models. Social Development, 11(2), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caetano, R., Field, C. A., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2005). The 5-year course of intimate partner violence among white, black, and hispanic couples in United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(9), 1039–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, R. J. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23–56). Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Chiodo, D., Crooks, C. V., Wolfe, D. A., McIsaac, C., Hughes, R., & Jaffe, P. G. (2012). Longitudinal prediction and concurrent functioning of adolescent girls demonstrating various profiles of dating violence and victimization. Prevention Science, 13, 350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0236-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: the developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly, J., & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationship in adolescence: the role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown & C. Feiring (Eds), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 266–290). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrensaft, M., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E., Chen, H., & Johnson, J. G. (2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 74–753.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, D., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Espelage, D. L., & Holt, M. K. (2007). Dating violence & sexual harassment across the bully-victim continuum among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36, 799–811.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9109-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, A. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foshee, V. A., Reyes, H. L. M., Ennett, S. T., Suchindran, C., Mathias, J. P., Karriker-Jaffe, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Benefield, T. S. (2011). Risk and protective factors distinguishing profiles of adolescent peer and dating violence perpetration. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 344–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredland, N. M. (2008). Sexual bullying: addressing the gap between bullying and dating violence. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(2), 95–105.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000319560.76384.8a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritz, P. A. T., Slep, A. M. S., & O’Leary, K. D. (2012). Couple-level analysis of the relation between family-of-origin aggression and intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 2(12), 139–153.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gómez, A. M. (2011). Testing the cycle of violence hypothesis: child abuse and adolescent dating violence as predictors of intimate partner violence in young adulthood. Youth & Society, 43(1), 171–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09358313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guerra, N. G., Huesmann, R., & Spindler, A. (2003). Community violence exposure, social cognition, and aggression among urban elementary school children. Child Development, 74(5), 1561–1576.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harlow, L. L. (2014). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Haselschwerdt, M. L., Savasuk-Luxton, R., & Hlavaty, K. (2017). A methodological review and critique of the “intergenerational transmission of violence” literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017692385.Google Scholar
  24. IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, R. M., Parker, E. M., Rinehart, J., Nail, J., & Rothman, E. F. (2015). Neighborhood factors and dating violence among youth: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 458–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jouriles, E. N., Garrido, E., Rosenfield, D., & McDonald, R. (2009). Experiences of psychological and physical aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: Links to psychological distress. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 451–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jouriles, E. N., Mueller, V., Rosenfield, D., McDonald, R., & Dodson, M. C. (2012). Teens’ experiences of harsh parenting and exposure to severe intimate partner violence: adding insult to injury in predicting teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 2(2), 125–138.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy, T. M., & Ceballo, R. (2016). Emotionally numb: desensitization to community violence exposure among urban youth. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 778–789.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H. (2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent dating relationships: Integrating cognitive, emotional, and peer influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 505–515.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lichter, E. L., & McCloskey, L. A. (2004). The effects of childhood exposure to marital violence on adolescent gender-role beliefs and dating violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 344–357.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00151.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malik, S., Sorenson, S. B., & Aneshensel, C. S. (1997). Community and dating violence among adolescents: perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 291–302. x(97)00143-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, S., Williams, J., Cutbush, S., Gibbs, D., Clinton-Sherrod, M., & Jones, S. (2013). Dating violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: longitudinal profiles and transitions over time. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42, 607–618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9914-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, A. M., Mrug, S., & Windle, M. (2015). From family violence to dating violence: testing a dual pathway model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0328-7.
  35. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s Guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  36. Mrug, S., Loosier, P. S., & Windle, M. (2008). Violence exposure across multiple contexts: Individual and joint effects on adjustment. American Journal oA social learning theoryf Orthopsychiatry, 78(1), 70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.78.1.70.Google Scholar
  37. Mrug, S., Madan, A., & Windle, M. (2016). Emotional desensitization to violence contributes to adolescents’ violent behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(1), 75–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-9986-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mrug, S., & Windle, M. (2010). Prospective effects of violence exposure across multiple contexts on early adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(8), 953–961.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02222.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ng-Mak, D. S., Salzinger, S., Feldman, R., & Stueve, A. (2002). Normalization of violence among inner-city youth: a formulation for research. American Journal of Othopsychiatry, 72(1), 92–101.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.72.1.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Keefe, M. (1998). Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Leary, K. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: a social learning theory perspective. In V. B. Van Hasselt, R. L. Morrison, A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds), Handbook of family violence (pp. 39–55). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Saint-Eloi Cadely, H., Pittman, J. F., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2018). Predicting patterns of intimate partner violence perpetration from late adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 088626051879517.Google Scholar
  43. Saint-Eloi Cadely, H., Kerpelman, J. L., & Pittman, J. F. (2018). Connections among identity, attachment, and psychological dating aggression during adolescence. Identity 18(1), 44–59.Google Scholar
  44. Saint-Eloi Cadely, H., Pittman, J. F. Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. Temporal associations between psychological and physical intimate partner violence: A cross-lag analysis. Partner Abuse. (In Press).Google Scholar
  45. Schnurr, M. P., & Lohman, B. J. (2008). How much does school matter? An examination of adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 37, 266–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9246-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnurr, M. P., & Lohman, B. J. (2013). The impact of collective efficacy on risks for adolescents’ perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 518–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9909-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735–747.Google Scholar
  48. Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(5), 572–579.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.5.572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simons, R. L., Lin, K., & Gordon, L. (1998). Socialization in the family of origin and male dating violence: a prospective study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 467–478.  https://doi.org/10.2307/353862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith-Marek, E. N., Cafferky, B., Dharnidharka, P., Mallory, A. B., Dominguez, M., High, J., Stith, S. M., & Mendez, M. (2015). Effects of childhood experiences of family violence on adult partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 498–519.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A., Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P. (2000). The intergenerational transmission of spouse abuse: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 640–654.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00640.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Straus, M. A. (2009). Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence by women has not been perceived and is often denied. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 18, 552–571.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770903103081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Taft, C. T., O’Farrell, T. J., Torres, S. E., Panuzio, J., Monson, C. M., Murphy, M., & Murphy, C. M. (2006). Examining the correlates of psychological aggression among a community sample of couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(4), 581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vézina, J., & Hébert, M. (2007). Risk factors for victimization in romantic relationships of young women: A review of empirical studies and implications for prevention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(1), 33–66.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838006297029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Widom, C. S. (1989a). Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, T. S., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Laporte, L. (2008). Risk models of dating aggression across different adolescent relationships: a developmental psychopathology approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 622–632.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.76.4.622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolf, K. A., & Foshee, V. A. (2003). Family violence, anger expression styles, and adolescent dating violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 309–316.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026237914406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A.-L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationship inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  3. 3.Rollins School of Public Health: Behavioral Sciences & Health EducationEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations