Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 1218–1233 | Cite as

Older Siblings as Academic Socialization Agents for Younger Siblings: Developmental Pathways across Adolescence

  • Ming-Te WangEmail author
  • Jessica L. Degol
  • Jamie L. Amemiya
Empirical Research

Abstract

The role of older siblings in younger siblings’ academic socialization becomes increasingly salient during adolescence. This longitudinal study examines the developmental mechanisms through which older siblings shape younger siblings’ academic outcomes and whether older siblings’ peer affiliations predict younger siblings’ educational aspirations and attainment. Data consisted of responses from 395 target adolescents (Mage = 12.22 years, 48.9% female; 51.6% African American, 38.5% European American) and their older siblings (Mage = 14.65 years, 50.1% female) across nine years. The findings showed that older siblings’ affiliation with academically disengaged peers at 7th grade predicted younger siblings’ decreased affiliation with academically engaged peers and increased affiliation with disengaged peers at 9th grade. In addition, younger siblings’ affiliation with academically engaged peers predicted greater educational aspirations at 11th grade, which in turn were related to higher postsecondary educational attainment. The identification of developmental processes through which older siblings were associated with younger siblings’ academic success may aid in creating supportive social environments in which adolescents can thrive.

Keywords

Siblings Family context Peer affiliation Educational attainment Academic engagement Academic socialization 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

M.-T.W. conceived of the study (i.e., study questions, study design, result interpretation), participated in the literature review, and drafted the introduction, literature review, and discussion sections; J.L.D. drafted the literature review and part of the discussion and provided feedback on the full draft; J.L.A. performed the data analysis, participated in the interpretation of the data, and drafted the method and result sections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Sharing and Declaration

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the University of Helsinki Ethical Review Board in the Humanities and Social and Behavioral Sciences.

Informed Consent

Participation was voluntary, and informed consent forms were collected from both the adolescents and their parents.

References

  1. Alfaro, E. C., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2010). Latino adolescents’ academic motivation: the role of siblings. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32, 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J. P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., & Marston, E. (2012). Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Development, 83, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beijers, J., Bijleveld, C., van de Weijer, S., & Liefbroer, A. (2017). “All in the family?” The relationship between sibling offending and offending risk. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 3, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchey, H. A., Shoulberg, E. K., Jodl, K. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2010). Longitudinal links between older sibling features and younger siblings’ academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody, G. H., Kim, S., Murry, V. M., & Brown, A. C. (2003). Longitudinal direct and indirect pathways linking older sibling competence to the development of younger sibling competence. Developmental Psychology, 39, 618–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, B. B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S. D., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buist, K. L. (2010). Sibling relationship quality and adolescent delinquency: a latent growth curve approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craine, J. L., Tanaka, T. A., Nishina, A., & Conger, K. J. (2009). Understanding adolescent delinquency: the role of older siblings’ delinquency and popularity with peers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel, E., Plamondon, A., & Jenkins, J. M. (2018). An examination of the sibling training hypothesis for disruptive behavior in early childhood. Child Development, 89, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Social Policy Report. Volume 20, Number 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development.Google Scholar
  17. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Developmental pathways from childhood aggression–disruptiveness, chronic peer rejection, and deviant friendships to early‐adolescent rule breaking. Child Development, 86, 614–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feinberg, M. E., & Hetherington, E. M. (2000). Sibling differentiation in adolescence: implications for behavioral genetic theory. Child Development, 71, 1512–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & Clements, P. (2001). Early adolescent peer orientation and adjustment during high school. Developmental Psychology, 37, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greer, K. B., Campione-Barr, N., Debrown, B., & Maupin, C. (2014). Do differences make the heart grow fonder? Associations between differential peer experiences on adolescent sibling conflict and relationship quality. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175, 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallberlin, J. (2015). Surviving the divorce: the power of the sibling relationship. Theses, Dissertations, and Projects. 646, Smith College. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/646.
  25. Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Lambert, K., & Gravelle, M. (2014). Enhancing peer cultures of academic effort and achievement in early adolescence: promotive effects of the SEALS intervention. Developmental Psychology, 50, 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haynie, D., & McHugh, S. (2003). Sibling deviance: in the shadows of mutual and unique friendship effects? Criminology, 41, 355–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill, N. E., & Wang, M. T. (2015). From middle school to college: developing aspirations, promoting engagement, and indirect pathways from parenting to post high school enrollment. Developmental Psychology, 51, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jensen, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). What makes siblings different? The development of sibling differences in academic achievement and interest. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Hawk, S. T., Schwartz, S. J., Frijns, T., & Koot, H. M., et al. (2012). Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency. Child Development, 83, 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kornreich, J. L., Hearn, K. D., Rodriguez, G., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2003). Sibling influence, gender roles, and the sexual socialization of urban early adolescent girls. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2010). Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 801–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kretschmer, T., & Pike, A. (2010). Links between nonshared friendship experiences and adolescent siblings’ differences in aspirations. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fontaine, R. G., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2014). Peer rejection, affiliation with deviant peers, delinquency, and risky sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1742–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li, M., Chen, J., Li, X., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Moderation of harsh parenting on genetic and environmental contributions to child and adolescent deviant peer affiliation: a longitudinal twin study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1396–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, Y., Lynch, A. D., Kalvin, C., Liu, J., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Peer relationships as a context for the development of school engagement during early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGuire, S., & Segal, N. L. (2013). Peer network overlap in twin, sibling, and friend dyads. Child Development, 84, 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melby, J. N., Conger, R. D., Fang, S. A., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Conger, K. J. (2008). Adolescent family experiences and educational attainment during early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1519–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th edn). Los Angeles: Muthén, L., & Muthén, B.Google Scholar
  40. Noller, P. (2005). Sibling relationships in adolescence: learning and growing together. Personal Relationships, 12, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rende, R., Slomkowski, C., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Niaura, R. (2005). Sibling effects on substance use in adolescence: social contagion and genetic relatedness. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowan, Z. R. (2016). Social risk factors of Black and White adolescents’ substance use: the differential role of siblings and best friends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1482–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheehan, G., Darlington, Y., Noller, P., & Feeney, J. (2004). Children’s perceptions of their sibling relationships during parental separation and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 41, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Friendship networks and achievement goals: an examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1453–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Slomkowski, C., Rende, R., Conger, K. J., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2001). Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence. Child Development, 72, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Steele, F., Rasbash, J., & Jenkins, J. (2013). A multilevel simultaneous equations model for within-cluster dynamic effects, with an application to reciprocal parent–child and sibling effects. Psychological Methods, 18, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallace, L. N. (2015). Sibling popularity: a moderator of sibling influence for adolescent substance use. Addiction Research & Theory, 23, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Degol, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2017a). Does everyone’s motivational beliefs about physical science decline in secondary school?: heterogeneity of adolescents’ achievement motivation trajectories in physics and chemistry. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1821–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2014). Staying engaged: knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: a review of the definition, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 315–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Schall, J. (2017b). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 58, 148–160.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, M. T., Kiuru, N., Degol, J. L., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2018). Friends, academic achievement, and school engagement during adolescence: a social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: examining dimensionality and measurement invariance across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whiteman, S. D., Bernard, J. M. B., & McHale, S. M. (2010). The nature and correlates of sibling influence in two-parent African American families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whiteman, S. D., & Christiansen, A. (2008). Processes of sibling influence in adolescence: individual and family correlates. Family Relations, 57, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whiteman, S. D., Jensen, A. C., & Maggs, J. L. (2014). Similarities and differences in adolescent siblings’ alcohol-related attitudes, use, and delinquency: evidence for convergent and divergent influence processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2007a). Competing processes of sibling influence: observational learning and sibling deidentification. Social Development, 16, 642–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2007b). Explaining sibling similarities: perceptions of sibling influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 963–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science: Vol. 3. Socioemotional Processes (7th edn). (pp. 657–700). Hoboken: Wiley. (Series Eds.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Te Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jessica L. Degol
    • 2
  • Jamie L. Amemiya
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Penn State AltoonaAltoonaUSA

Personalised recommendations