Factor Structure and Criterion Validity of the Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development in a Multi-University Sample of College Students
- 623 Downloads
There is growing recognition that clinical and developmental outcomes will be optimized by interventions that harness strengths in addition to ameliorating deficits. Although empirically-supported methods for identifying strengths are available for children and adolescents, this framework has yet to be applied to emerging adulthood. This study evaluates the nature of the Five Cs model of Positive Youth Development (PYD) – character, confidence, competence, connection, and caring – in a sample of emerging adults from six universities (N = 4654; 70% female; 81% White). Historically, PYD has been modeled as either separate correlated factors or a second-order factor structure. More recently, the bifactor model has been recommended to determine the degree to which PYD is unidimensional versus multidimensional. The present study examined the multidimensionality of PYD by comparing the model fit of a one-factor, five-correlated factor model, and second-order factor structure with a bifactor model and found support for the bifactor model with evidence of invariance across sex. Criterion validity was also assessed using three criterion measures particularly relevant for adjustment during emerging adulthood: anxiety, depressive symptoms, and emotion regulation difficulties. PYD and the residual Cs tended to correlate negatively with indicators of maladaptive development. Future directions including applications of the PYD framework as a measure of thriving across emerging adulthood are discussed.
KeywordsFactor structure Five Cs Internalizing Positive youth development Resilience Psychometrics
MD conceived the study, made substantive intellectual contributions to the concept and design of this study and the preparation of this manuscript. MD was responsible for performing all analyses and interpretations of the data and led the coordination and drafting of the manuscript. MK conceived the study, participated in the design and coordination of the study, and preparation of this manuscript by contributing to the revisions of drafts of this manuscript content, and providing guidance on the acquisition of data. GB provided guidance on the analytic plan, participated in the design and helped to draft the manuscript. AL, AG, and MJ participated in the design and coordination of the study and provided revisions on the drafting of the manuscript. ES participated in the drafting of this manuscript. SB participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Stephen Becker is supported by award number K23MH108603 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Data Sharing and Declaration
This manuscript’s data will not be deposited.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
At five of the universities, a waiver of consent was obtained since no identifying information was collected. A detailed information sheet was presented to participants before starting the survey and stated that “by choosing to move forward with the survey and submitting your completed survey, you indicate your consent for your answers to be used in this research study.” The information sheet also provided participants with information about the study, as well as risks/benefits, their rights as participants, that they could choose to not answer any question, and that they could withdraw at any time without penalty. At the sixth university, in person informed consent was obtained.
- Becker, S. P., Burns, G. L., Garner, A. A., Jarrett, M. A., Luebbe, A. M., Epstein, J. N., & Willcutt, E. G. (2018). Sluggish cognitive tempo in adults: psychometric validation of the Adult Concentration Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brewer, S. E., Nicotera, N., Veeh, C., & Laser-Maira, J. A. (2018). Predictors of positive development in first year college students. Journal of American College Health, (online first), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Bowers, E. P., Li, Y., Kiely, M. K., Brittian, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). The five Cs model of positive youth development: a longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and adolescence, 39(7), 720–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner, & L. Steinberg, (eds.) Handbook of adolescent psychology. (pp. 125–154). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. & Gootman, J. (Eds.) (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Enochs W. K., & Roland C. B. (2006). Social adjustment of college freshmen: the importance of gender and living environment. College Student Journal, 40(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (1983). Development perspectives on the self-system. In Paul H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael’s Manual of child psychology. Wiley: New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Harter, S. (2012). Self-perception profile for adolescents: Manual and questionnaires. Denver: University of Denver.Google Scholar
- Heck, K. E., & Subramaniam, A. (2009). Youth development Frameworks. [Monograph]. Davis, CA: 4-H Center for Youth Development. California: University of California.Google Scholar
- Jelicic, H., Bobek, D. L., Phelps, E., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 263–273.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Agans, J. P., Arbeit, M. R., Chase, P. A., Weiner, M. B., Schmid, K. L., & Warren, A. E. A. (2013). Resilience and positive youth development: a relational developmental systems model. In Handbook of resilience in children. Boston, MA: Springer 293–308.as findings are mixed dependingGoogle Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., & Gestsdottir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development proas findings are mixed dependinggrams, and community contributions of fifth grade adolescents: findings from the first wave of the 4-H Studas findings are mixed dependingy of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lewin-Bizan S. (2009b). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: a view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 567–570.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In: In A. Maydeu-Olivares, J. J. McArdle, (eds.) Contemporary psychometrics. (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Masten, A. S. (2014). Invited commentary: resilience and positive youth development frameworks in developmental science.Google Scholar
- Masten, A. S., Obradović, J., & Burt, K. (2006). Resilience in emerging adulthood: developmental perspectives on continuity and transformation: coming of age in the 21st Century. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America Coming of age in the 21st Century (pp. 173–190). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mueller, M. K., Phelps, E., Bowers, E. P., Agans, J. P., Urban, J. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Youth development program participation and intentional self-regulation skills: Contextual and individual bases of pathways to positive youth development. Journal of adolescence, 34(6), 1115–1125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2017.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics (2017). Total fall enrollment in degree-granting post-secondary institutions, by level of enrollment, sex, attendance status, and race/ethnicity of student: selected years, 1976 through 2016.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: what it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical Assessment, 17(15), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E. A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of positive youth development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sinclair, S. J., Siefert, C. J., Slavin-Mulford, J. M., Stein, M. B., Renna, M., & Blais, M. A. (2012). Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of US adults. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 35(3), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Small, S. A., & Rodgers, K. B. (1995). Teen assessment project (TAP) survey question bank. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar