Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 17–29 | Cite as

The Consequences of Adolescent Delinquent Behavior for Adult Employment Outcomes

  • Angela CarterEmail author
Empirical Research
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

Delinquent behavior is common during adolescence and may disrupt trajectories of labor market attainment. Estimates of the relationship between delinquency and employment are threatened by selection bias, as youth who engage in delinquency often differ substantially from youth who do not. The current study examined the association between adolescents’ engagement in serious delinquency and four measures of occupational attainment in young adulthood: unemployment, personal earnings, employer-provided benefits, and occupational earnings. It examined the effect of delinquency independent of between-person differences in a variety of attributes and tested whether the hypothesized relationship was mediated by educational attainment, work experience, disconnectedness from both education and work, or criminal justice sanctioning. This study analyzed data from the first four waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), yielding an analytic sample of 14,800 (51% female, mean age 16 years). The Wave 1 Add Health survey was administered in 1994–1995, and Wave 4 of the survey was administered in 2007–2008. The analytic strategy, propensity score weighting, produced estimates that were less biased by differences between youth who had and who had not engaged in delinquent behavior. The study found that delinquency was significantly associated with the likelihood of being unemployed: compared to non-delinquents, delinquents were more likely to be unemployed even after controlling for temporally prior traits and resources, human capital, and criminal justice contact. The results provided more qualified support for hypothesized relationships between delinquency and job quality. The study concluded that offending may result in less fruitful job searches, but once a search results in employment, employed delinquents are not readily discernible from employed non-delinquents in the quality of their jobs. These conclusions contribute to literature on the labor market outcomes of people with histories of adolescent delinquency as they enter young adulthood.

Keywords

Delinquency Adolescent work Employment Criminal justice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis. The author gratefully acknowledges feedback from Bill McCarthy on multiple drafts of this manuscript.

Funding

The author received funding from the UC Davis Sociology Department and UC Davis Institute for Social Sciences to support initial drafts of this manuscript.

Data Sharing Declaration

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Carolina Population Center but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. However, data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Carolina Population Center.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

Add Health participants provided written informed consent for participation in all aspects of Add Health in accordance with the University of North Carolina School of Public Health Institutional Review Board guidelines that are based on the Code of Federal Regulations on the Protection of Human Subjects 45CFR46.

References

  1. Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apel, R., & Sweeten, G. (2010). Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In Alex R.Piquero, David. Weisburd (eds.), In Handbook of quantitative criminology. (pp. 543–562). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin, P. C., & Stuart, E. A. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34(28), 3661–3679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjerk, D. (2009). How much can we trust causal interpretations of fixed-effects estimators in the context of criminality? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 391–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand, J. E., & Thomas, J. S. (2014). Causal effect heterogeneity. In Stephen L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 189–213). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Buchmann, M., & Steinhoff, A. (2017). Social inequality, life course transitions, and adolescent development: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(10), 2083–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (2002). Social exclusion and the transition from school to work: the case of young people not in education, employment, or training (NEET). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(2), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caspi, A., Bem, D. J., & Elder, Jr., G. (1989). Continuities and consequences of interactional styles across the life course. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspi, A., Entner Wright, B. R., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Early failure in the labor market: childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colman, I., Murray, J., Abbott, R. A., Maughan, B., Kuh, D., Croudace, T. J., & Jones, P. B. (2009). Outcomes of conduct problems in adolescence: 40 year follow-up of national cohort. British Medical Journal, 338(7688), 208–211.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, S., & Tanner, J. (2003). The long arm of the law: effects of labeling on employment. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(3), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DuGoff, E. H., Schuler, M., & Stuart, E. A. (2014). Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emsley, R., Lunt, M., Pickles, A., & Dunn, G. (2008). Implementing double-robust estimators of causal effects. The Stata Journal, 8(3), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Show me the child at seven: the consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(8), 837–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilman, A. B., Hill, K. G., & Hawkins, D. J. (2014). Long-term consequences of adolescent gang membership for adult functioning. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), 938–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity score analysis: statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1997). Mean streets: youth homelessness and crime. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, K. M. (2009). The national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002; Wave IV, 2007-2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Jessor, R. (2018). Reflections on six decades of research on adolescent behavior and development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2013). Misdemeanor justice: control without conviction. American Journal of Sociology, 119(2), 351–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lageson, S. E. (2016). Found out and opting out: the consequences of online criminal records for families. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 665(1), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lancetot, N., Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). Delinquent behavior, official delinquency, and gender: consequences for adult functioning and well-being. Criminology, 45(1), 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mihalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997). Short- and long-term consequences of adolescent work. Youth & Society, 28(4), 464–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mortimer, J. T., Pimentel, E. E., Ryu, S., Nash, K., & Lee, C. (1996). Part-time work and occupational value formation in adolescence. Social Forces, 74(4), 1405–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(2), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Employment and unemployment rates by educational attainment. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cbc.pdf
  29. Nelson, D. (2004). Moving youth from risk to opportunity. The 2004 KIDS count data. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation. http://www.aecf.org/kidscount Google Scholar
  30. Osgood, D. W., McMorris, B. J., & Potenza, M. T. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance i: item response theory scaling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(3), 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pager, D. (2007). Marked: race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paternoster, R., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: the short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodwell, L., Romaniuk, H., Nilsen, W., Carlin, J. B., Lee, K. J., & Patton, G. C. (2018). Adolescent mental health and behavioural predictors of being NEET: a prospective study of young adults not in employment, education, or training. Psychological Medicine, 48(5), 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schiraldi, V., Western, B., & Bradner, K. (2015). Community-based responses to justice-involved young adults. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. (2008). Adolescent development and the regulation of youth crime. The Future of Children, 18(2), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: how the war on crime transformed american democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Staff, J., & Uggen, C. (2003). The fruits of good work: early work experiences and adolescent deviance. Journal of Research in Crimean and Delinquency, 40(3), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staff, J., Schulenberg, J. E., & Bachman, J. G. (2010). Adolescent work intensity, school performance, and academic engagement. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sweeten, G., Bushway, S. D., & Paternoster, R. (2009). Does dropping out of school mean dropping into delinquency? Criminology, 47(1), 47–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanner, J., Davies, S., & O’Grady, B. (1999). Whatever happened to yesterday’s rebels? longitudinal effects of youth delinquency on education and employment. Social Problems, 46(2), 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomlinson, M., & Walker, R. (2010). Poverty, adolescent well-being and outcomes later in life. Journal of International Development, 22(8), 1162–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Torche, F. (2011). Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the united states. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 763–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. von Hippel, P. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: an improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010). Incarceration and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2010). Incarceration & social inequality. Daedalus, 139(3), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UC Berkeley School of Law, 355University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations