Social Withdrawal and Social Surrogacy in Emerging Adulthood
Shyness has been well established as a hindrance to social adjustment and may be problematic for emerging adults attending university, given the high social expectations placed upon students. Previous studies suggest emerging adults high in shyness recruit their friends to act as social surrogates in order to help reduce the stress of entering social interactions; yet, whether other less studied forms of social withdrawal (i.e., avoidance, unsociability) are associated with social surrogacy remains uninvestigated. The goal of the present study was to examine differences between subtypes of withdrawal as related to social surrogacy, while considering the roles of social anxiety and social self-efficacy. Participants were 961 emerging adults (76% female; 67% Caucasian) between the ages of 18 and 25 (M = 20.15, SD = 1.71). The results indicated that patterns of social surrogacy varied between withdrawal subtypes, such that social surrogacy was positively related to shyness, and negatively related to unsociability, whereas avoidance yielded mixed results. The findings highlight the importance of considering withdrawal motivations in understanding social surrogacy.
KeywordsSocial surrogacy Social withdrawal Shyness Social anxiety Social self-efficacy Emerging adulthood
LC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. AM participated in the design and coordination of the study, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. KS participated in the design and coordination of the study, and helped to interpret the data and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors did not receive funding to support this research.
Data Sharing and Declaration
The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval for this research was issued by the Saint Mary’s University Research Ethics Board (SMU REB file number: 17-046).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Coplan, R. J., & Ooi, L. (2014). The causes and consequences of “playing alone” in childhood. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 111–128). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Helbig-Lang, S., & Petermann, F. (2010). Tolerate or eliminate? A systematic review on the effect of safety behavior across anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 218–233.Google Scholar
- Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Badger, S., Barry, C. M., Carroll, J. S., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Associations between shyness and internalizing behaviours, externalizing behaviours, and relationships during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9203-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nikitin, J., & Schoch, S. (2014). Social approach and avoidance motivations. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 202–223). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., & Coplan, R. J. (2018). Avoiding and withdrawing from the peer group. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interaction, relationships, and groups. 2nd ed. (pp. 322–346). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Sevinc, S., & Gizir, C. A. (2014). Factors negatively affecting university adjustment from the views of first-year university student: The case of Mersin University. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14, 1301–1308.Google Scholar