Structural Home Environment Effects on Developmental Trajectories of Self-Control and Adolescent Risk Taking
Extant literature has demonstrated that self-control is critical for health and adjustment in adolescence. Questions remain regarding whether there are individuals that may be most vulnerable to impaired self-control development and whether aspects of the structural home environment may predict membership in these subgroups, as well as the behavioral consequences of impaired self-control trajectories. The present study utilized growth mixture modeling and data from 1083 individuals (50% female, 82% White) from age 8.5 to 15 years to identify four latent classes of self-control development. Additionally, higher household chaos and lower socioeconomic status at age 8.5 were associated with maladaptive trajectories of self-control at ages 8.5–11.5. In turn, maladaptive self-control trajectories at ages 8.5–11.5 were associated with higher risk taking at age 15. The results highlight the importance of increased structure and support for at-risk youth.
KeywordsSES Household chaos Self-control Risk taking Adolescence
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse awarded to Jungmeen Kim-Spoon/Brooks King-Casas (DA 036017) and Gene Brody (DA 027827), and from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development awarded to Kirby Deater-Deckard (HD 054481). We thank Kathy Faris for reviewing literature relevant to the current study and Eileen Neubaum Carlan for editorial assistance. The Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development was conducted by the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, and was supported by NICHD through a cooperative agreement that calls for scientific collaboration between the grantees and the NICHD staff. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank the study participants and research staff.
C.H. conceived of the study, participated in its design, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript; A.B. performed statistical analyses, edited the manuscript, and substantially contributed to the revisions of the manuscript; R.K. participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; K.D.D. conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data, and edited the manuscript; J.K.S. conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse awarded to Jungmeen Kim-Spoon/Brooks King-Casas (DA 036017) and Gene Brody (DA 027827), and from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development awarded to Kirby Deater-Deckard (HD 054481).
Data Sharing and Declaration
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/series/00233.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Berry, D., McCartney, K., Petrill, S., Deater‐Deckard, K., & Blair, C. (2014). Gene–environment interaction between DRD4 7‐repeat VNTR and early child‐care experiences predicts self‐regulation abilities in prekindergarten. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blair, C., & Ursache, A. (2011). A bidirectional model of executive functions and self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). Growing chaos in the lives of children, youth, and families: how can we turn it around? In J. C. Westman (Ed.), Parenthood in America (pp. 197–210). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Conger, R. D., & Elder, Jr, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: adapting to change in rural America. Social Institutions and social change. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Evans, G. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, G. W. & Wachs, T. D. (Eds.) (2010). Chaos and its influence on children’s development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Evans, G. W., Eckenrode, J., & Marcynyszyn, L. A. (2010). Chaos and the macrosetting: the role of poverty and socioeconomic status. In G. W. Evans & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Chaos and its influence on children’s development: an ecological perspective (pp. 225-238). 10.1037/12057-014Google Scholar
- Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2009). Children’s behaviors and interactions with peers. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 45–62). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Fosco, G. M., Frank, J. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). Opening the “Black Box”: family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system: manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Kahn, R. E., Holmes, C., Farley, J. P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2015). Delay discounting mediates parent–adolescent relationship quality and risky sexual behavior for low self-control adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0332-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim-Spoon, J. & Grimm, K. J. (2016). Latent growth modeling and developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Development and psychopathology : Vol. I Theory and Method, 3rd edn (pp. 986–1041). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Ladd, G.W. (2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: a century of progress. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108.
- Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Time Books.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.Google Scholar
- Nigg, J. T. (2017). Annual research review: on the relations among self‐regulation, self‐control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk‐taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pianta, R. (1992). Student-teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Romer, D., Betancourt, L. M., Brodsky, N. L., Giannetta, J. M., Yang, W., & Hurt, H. (2011). Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working memory performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescence. Developmental Science, 14, 1119–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock (Ed.), Advances in latent variable mixture models. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Vazsonyi, A. T., Roberts, J. W., Huang, L., & Vaughn, M. G. (2015). Why focusing on nurture made and still makes sense: the biosocial development of self-control. The Routledge international handbook of biosocial criminology (pp. 263–279). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar