Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 1665–1672 | Cite as

Geographical clustering and the evaluation of cluster policies: introduction

  • Uwe Cantner
  • Holger GrafEmail author
  • Michael Rothgang
Article

Abstract

The article introduces the special section on “Geographical Clustering and the Evaluation of Cluster Policies”. We first provide a motivation of cluster policies and briefly review the state of the art in cluster evaluation research. We proceed with summaries of the papers comprising the special section, which take different perspectives and cover distinct facets of cluster policy evaluation. The papers identify challenges for evaluation by highlighting the variety of approaches towards cluster policies addressed at different policy levels. Additional challenges for an identification of policy impact result from the complexity as well as the timing of policy effects. Thus, proper evaluations should employ and combine a broad set of evaluation methods. Based on the main lessons learned, we finally propose several avenues for future research to cope with these challenges.

Keywords

Clusters Cluster policy Policy evaluation 

JEL Classification

D78 H50 O38 R32 

References

  1. Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,4, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool (pp. 3–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139858472.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brakman, S., & van Marrewijk, C. (2013). Reflections on cluster policies. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,6(2), 217–231.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, T., & Schlump, C. (2011). Policy measures and their effects in the different phases of the cluster life cycle. Regional Studies,45(10), 1363–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2003). Innovationssysteme und kollektive Innovationsprozesse. In U. Cantner, R. Helm, & R. Meckl (Eds.), Strukturen und Strategien in einem Innovationssystem: Das Beispiel Jena (pp. 21–44). Sternenfels: Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis.Google Scholar
  6. Crass, D., Rammer, C., & Aschhoff, B. (2017). Geographical clustering and the effectiveness of public innovation programs. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9584-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crespo, J., Suire, R., & Vicente, J. (2015). Network structural properties for cluster long-run dynamics: Evidence from collaborative R&D networks in the European mobile phone industry. Industrial and Corporate Change,25(2), 261–282.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duranton, G. (2011). California dreamin’: The feeble case for cluster policies. Review of Economic Analysis,3(1), 3–45.Google Scholar
  9. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (Eds.) (2016). Handbook of innovation policy impact. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856.
  10. Engel, D., Eckl, V., & Rothgang, M. (2017). R&D funding and private R&D: Empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9609-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fier, A., & Harhoff, D. (2002). Die evolution der bundesdeutschen Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik: Ruckblick und Bestandsaufnahme. Perspektiven Der Wirtschaftspolitik,3(3), 279–301.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2516.00092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy,20(5), 499–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinzmann, S., Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2017). The role of geographical proximity for project performance: Evidence from the German Leading-Edge cluster competition. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9600-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kiese, M. (2017). Regional cluster policies in Germany: Challenges, impacts and evaluation practices. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9589-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation,25(6), 609–619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national systems of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). Public support to clusters: A firm level study of French “Local Productive Systems”. Regional Science and Urban Economics,41(2), 108–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy Panacea? Journal of Economic Geography,3(1), 5–35.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional conditions and innovation systems: On the impact of regional policy on firms in different sectors. Regional Studies,48(1), 127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.649004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011a). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. Journal of Technology Transfer,36(2), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011b). Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy. Research Policy,40(5), 714–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review,76(6), 77–90.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly,14(1), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothgang, M., Dehio, J., & Lageman, B. (2017). Analysing the effects of cluster policy: What can we learn from the German leading-edge cluster competition? The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9616-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saxenian, A. (1991). The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy,20(5), 423–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90067-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Töpfer, S., Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2017). Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German Leading-Edge Clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9642-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2016). The impact of cluster policy on innovation. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, & P. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 196–225). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856.00014.
  29. Wolf, T., Cantner, U., Graf, H., & Rothgang, M. (2017). Cluster ambidexterity towards exploration and exploitation: Strategies and cluster management. The Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9617-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Department of Marketing and ManagementUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  3. 3.RWI - Leibniz Institute for Economic ResearchEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations