Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 210–230 | Cite as

The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

  • Jie Wu
  • Kathryn Rudie Harrigan
  • Siah Hwee Ang
  • Zefu WuEmail author
Article
  • 263 Downloads

Abstract

This study proposes and tests a theoretical framework that relates a firm’s imitation strategy and its interaction with R&D resources to incremental and radical innovation. The analysis of a panel dataset of 1381 Chinese manufacturing firms in the period 2008–2014 shows that imitation strategy is positively related to incremental innovation but has an inverted U-shaped relationship with radical innovation. More interestingly, R&D resources serve as a critical boundary condition of the imitation strategy–innovation link—they strengthen the link between imitation strategy and incremental innovation but weaken the link between imitation strategy and radical innovation.

Keywords

Imitation strategy Incremental innovation Radical innovation R&D resources China 

JEL Classification

O32 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank very much Shuaihe Zhuo for his excellent assistant in data analyses. Financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71728003).

References

  1. Adams, J., & Jaffe, A. (1996). Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(4), 700–721.Google Scholar
  2. Ahuja, G., & Morris Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 521–543.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.Google Scholar
  5. Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559–1581.Google Scholar
  6. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–706.Google Scholar
  7. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.Google Scholar
  8. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.Google Scholar
  9. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170.Google Scholar
  10. Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160–163.Google Scholar
  12. Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 474–487.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  15. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlin, K. B., & Behrens, D. M. (2005). When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy, 34(5), 717–737.Google Scholar
  17. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organisational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.Google Scholar
  18. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166.Google Scholar
  19. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.Google Scholar
  20. Dibrell, C., Craig, J., & Hansen, E. (2011). Natural environment, market orientation, and firm innovativeness: An organizational life cycle perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(3), 467–489.Google Scholar
  21. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  23. Dutta, S., & Weiss, A. M. (1997). The relationship between a firm’s level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Science, 43(3), 343–356.Google Scholar
  24. Eiriz, V., Faria, A., & Barbosa, N. (2013). Firm growth and innovation: Towards a typology of innovation strategy. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 15(1), 97–111.Google Scholar
  25. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84–110.Google Scholar
  26. Ethiraj, S. K., & Zhu, D. H. (2008). Performance effects of imitative entry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 797–817.Google Scholar
  27. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.Google Scholar
  28. Fligstein, N. (1985). The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 55–78.Google Scholar
  29. Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125–1135.Google Scholar
  30. Galasso, A., & Schankerman, M. (2015). Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 317–369.Google Scholar
  31. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ghemawat, P., & Hout, T. (2008). Tomorrow’s global giants. Harvard Business Review, 86(11), 80–88.Google Scholar
  33. Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. NBER working paper no. 330: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  35. Hair, A., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Hannan, M. T., & Carroll, G. (1992). Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harrigan, K. R., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2016). Sustainability of patent-based competitive advantage in the communications-services industry. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9515-2.Google Scholar
  39. Harrigan, K. R., Di Guardo, M. C., & Cowgill, B. (2016). Multiplicative innovation synergies: Tests in technological acquisitions. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9514-3.Google Scholar
  40. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Models of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472–500.Google Scholar
  41. Hausman, J., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), 909–938.Google Scholar
  42. Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475.Google Scholar
  43. Huff, L. C., & Robinson, W. T. (1994). The impact of leadtime and years of competitive rivalry on pioneer market share advantages. Management Science, 40(10), 1370–1377.Google Scholar
  44. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.Google Scholar
  45. Jonsson, S., & Regnér, P. (2009). Normative barriers to imitation: Social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 517–536.Google Scholar
  46. Jullens, J. (2013). How emerging giants can take on the world. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 121–125.Google Scholar
  47. Katila, R. (2000). Using patent data to measure innovation performance. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2(1), 180–193.Google Scholar
  48. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20.Google Scholar
  49. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.Google Scholar
  50. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  51. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, H., Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., & Schomburg, A. (2000). Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 23–30.Google Scholar
  53. Lee, R. P., & Zhou, K. Z. (2012). Is product imitation good for firm performance? An examination of product imitation types and contingency factors. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  54. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112.Google Scholar
  55. Levitt, T. (1966). Innovative imitation. Harvard Business Review, 44(5), 63–70.Google Scholar
  56. Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366–385.Google Scholar
  57. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1111–1125.Google Scholar
  58. Link, A. N., & Neufeld, J. L. (1986). Innovation versus imitation: Investigating alternative R & D strategies. Applied Economics, 18(12), 1359–1363.Google Scholar
  59. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.Google Scholar
  60. Luo, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, L. S. (2011). Emerging economy copycats: Capability, environment, and strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 37–56.Google Scholar
  61. MacMillan, I., McCaffery, M. L., & Van Wijk, G. (1985). Competitors’ responses to easily imitated new products: Exploring commercial banking product introductions. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 75–86.Google Scholar
  62. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397–417.Google Scholar
  63. Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. J. (1999). The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 239–257.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  65. Odagiri, H. (1994). Growth through competition, competition through growth: Strategic management and the economy in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Ofek, E., & Turut, O. (2008). To innovate or imitate? Entry strategy and the role of market research. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(5), 575–592.Google Scholar
  67. Ottesen, G. G., & Grønhaug, K. (2004). Exploring the dynamics of market orientation in turbulent environments: A case study. European Journal of Marketing, 38(8), 956–973.Google Scholar
  68. Palley, T. I. (1995). Safety in numbers: A model of managerial herd behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28(3), 443–450.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.Google Scholar
  71. Rhee, M., Kim, Y. C., & Han, J. (2006). Confidence in imitation: Niche-width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Science, 52(4), 501–513.Google Scholar
  72. Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46(6), 824–844.Google Scholar
  73. Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science, 12(3), 274–293.Google Scholar
  74. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306.Google Scholar
  75. Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 465–479.Google Scholar
  76. Schmidt, J. B., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). Are really new product development projects harder to shut down? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 111–123.Google Scholar
  77. Schoenmakers, W., & Duysters, G. (2010). The technological origins of radical innovations. Research Policy, 39(8), 1051–1059.Google Scholar
  78. Shenkar, O. (2010a). Copycats: How smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  79. Shenkar, O. (2010b). Imitation is more valuable than innovation. Harvard Business Review, 88(4), 28–29.Google Scholar
  80. Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
  81. Sternitzke, C. (2010). Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations. Research Policy, 39(6), 810–821.Google Scholar
  82. Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Summer Special Issue), 21–38.Google Scholar
  83. Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  84. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation, integrating technological, market and organizational change (3rd ed.). Haddington: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.Google Scholar
  86. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.Google Scholar
  87. Wu, J. (2012). Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity. Research Policy, 41(2), 489–496.Google Scholar
  88. Wu, J. (2013). Marketing capabilities, institutional development, and the performance of emerging market firms: A multinational study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1), 36–45.Google Scholar
  89. Wu, J., Si, S., & Wu, X.-B. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and innovation: Informal debt as an empirical case. Strategic Entrepreneurial Journal, 10(3), 257–273.Google Scholar
  90. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  91. Zeng, M., & Williamson, P. J. (2007). Dragons at your door: How Chinese cost innovation is disrupting global competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  92. Zhou, Z. K. (2006). Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 394–402.Google Scholar
  93. Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561.Google Scholar
  94. Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Wu
    • 1
  • Kathryn Rudie Harrigan
    • 2
  • Siah Hwee Ang
    • 3
  • Zefu Wu
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.University of MacauTaipaMacao
  2. 2.Business SchoolColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  4. 4.City University of MacauTaipaMacao

Personalised recommendations