Cluster ambidexterity towards exploration and exploitation: strategies and cluster management
- 427 Downloads
Cluster studies have shown that innovation often results from an inter-organizational process, where a division of labor with regard to exploration and exploitation exists among the actors inside a cluster. A cluster is ambidextrous if it manages to balance innovative activities that exploit existing competencies and is open to novel technological approaches by means of exploration. In this context, we are interested in the supportive role of cluster management, assuming that a cluster organization can only persist sustainably if exploitation and exploration are pursued in an appropriate balance. Our analysis is based on surveys conducted between 2011 and 2012 with ten cluster managements and their respective cluster firms of the first two waves of the German Leading Edge Cluster Competition. Our results indicate that the demand for services offered by the cluster management depends on companies’ strategies with respect to exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity. In turn, the priorities set by the cluster management can be explained by the firms’ needs. Accordingly, we argue that cluster management acts as a service provider, helping the cluster companies to become ambidextrous which, in turn, makes the cluster as a whole ambidextrous.
KeywordsCluster Ambidexterity Cluster management Exploration Exploitation
JEL ClassificationD22 O32 R32
The study was financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for the research project ‘‘Begleitende Evaluierung des Spitzencluster-Wettbewerbs’’. Tina Wolf thankfully acknowledges the German Research Foundation (DFG) for providing a position within the DFG-GRK 1411 ‘‘The Economics of Innovative Change’’. We wish to thank two anonymous referees, members the research group DFG-GRK 1411, as well as participants at the Workshop on ‘‘Clusterforschung und Evaluierung von Clusterpolitiken’’ for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our own.
- Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology. What It is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography,28(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
- BMBF. (2010). Leitfaden zur Antragsstellung im Spitzencluster-Wettbewerb (3. Wettbewerbsrunde) des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
- Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy, & D. Sleven (Eds.), The management of organization (pp. 167–188). New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Gilsing, V. (2000). Cluster governance: How clusters can adapt and renew over time. Presented at the Druid PhD-Conference, Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://www.druid.dk/conferences/winter2000/gilsing.
- Kauppila, O. (2007). Towards a network model of ambidexterity (No. W-429) (p. 429). Helsinki School of Economics Working Papers.Google Scholar
- Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review,82(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review,76(6), 77–90.Google Scholar
- Rothgang, M., Cantner, U., Dehio, J., Engel, D., Fertig, M., Graf, H. & Töpfer, S. (2015). Accompanying Evaluation of the Funding Instrument “Spitzencluster-Wettbewerb” (Leading-Edge Cluster Competition) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Final Report-Summary. Retrieved from http://www.rwi-essen.de/media/content/pages/publikationen/rwi-materialien/rwi-materialien_90_spitzencluster_en.pdf.
- Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Saxenian, A. (1996). Inside-out: Regional networks and industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cityscape, 2, 41–60.Google Scholar
- Scheer, G., & von Zallinger, L. (2007). Cluster management : A practical guide. Eschborn: GTZ.Google Scholar
- Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. H. M. (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook (1st ed.). Sweden: Ivory Tower.Google Scholar