Advertisement

Leontovich–Fock Parabolic Equation Method in the Neumann Diffraction Problem on a Prolate Body of Revolution

  • A. S. KirpichnikovaEmail author
  • N. Ya. Kirpichnikova
Article
  • 2 Downloads

This paper continues a series of publications on the shortwave diffraction of the plane wave on prolate bodies of revolution with axial symmetry in the Neumann problem. The approach, which is based on the Leontovich–Fock parabolic equation method for the two parameter asymptotic expansion of the solution, is briefly described. Two correction terms are found for the Fock’s main integral term of the solution expansion in the boundary layer. This solution can be continuously transformed into the ray solution in the illuminated zone and decays exponentially in the shadow zone. If the observation point is in the shadow zone near the scatterer, then the wave field can be obtained with the help of residue theory for the integrals of the reflected field, because the incident field does not reach the shadow zone. The obtained residues are necessary for the unique construction of the creeping waves in the boundary layer of the scatterer in the shadow zone.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. A. Fock, Electromagnetic Diffraction and Propagation Problems, International Series of Monographs on Electromagnetic Waves, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. V. Andronov, “Diffraction of strongly elongation body of revolution,” Acoustic Physics, 57, No. 2, 147–152 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. V. Andronov, “Diffraction of a plane wave incident at a small angle to the axis of a strongly elongation spheroid,” Acoustic Physics, 58, No. 5, 521–529 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Ya. Kirpichnikova and M. M. Popov, “The Leontovich-Fock parabolic equation method in problems of short-wave diffraction by prolate bodies,” J. Mathem. Sciences, 194, No. 42, 30–43 (2013).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Ya. Kirpichnikova, M. M. Popov, and N. M. Semtchenok, “On short-wave diffraction by an elongated body. Numerical experiments,” Zap. Nauchn. Semin. POMI, 451 (46), 65–78 (2016).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. M. Popov and N. Ya. Kirpichnikova, “On problems of applying the parabolic equation to diffraction by prolate bodies,” Acoustical Physics, 60, No. 4, 363–370 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Ya. Kirpichnikova and M. M. Popov, “Merging of asymptotics in the illuminated part of the Fock domain,” J. Math. Sciences, 214, No. 3, 277–286 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. M. Babich and N. Ya. Kirpichnikova, The Boundary-Layer Method in Diffraction Problems, Springer-Verlag (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. M. Babich and V. Buldyrev, Asymptotic Methods in Short-Wavelength Diffraction Theory, Alpha Science, Oxford (2007).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. M. Babich, “On short wavelength asymptotics of Green’s function for the exterior of a compact convex domain,” Dokl. AN SSSR, 146, No. 3, 571–573 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Ya. Kirpichnikova, “On propagation of surface waves, which are concentrated in the vicinity of rays in an inhomogeneous elastic body of arbitrary shape,” Trudy MIAN, CXV, No. 1, 114–130 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. S. Buslaev, “Short wavelength asymptotics in the problem of diffraction by smooth convex contours,” XXIII, No. 2, 14–117 (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. B. Philippov, “On mathematical justification of the short wavelength asymptotics of the diffraction problem in shadow zone,” J. Soviet Mathematics, 6, No. 5, 577–626 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. S. Ivanov, “Calculation of corrections to the Fock’s asymptotic formula for the wave field in a neighborhood of surfaces of circular cylinder and a sphere,” J. Soviet Mathematics, 20, No. 1, 1812–1817 (1982).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. G. Friedlander and J. B. Keller, “Asymptotic expansion of solution of ( 2 +k 2)u = 0,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 8, No. 3, 378–394 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. B. Keller, “Diffraction by a convex cylinder,” Trans. IRE Ant. Prop., 4, No. 3, 312–321 (1956).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg Department of the Steklov Mathematical Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Computing Science and MathematicsUniversity of Stirling, the UKStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations