Using Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories Alone or Together―Which Works Better for Acquiring Knowledge and Skills?
Although hands-on laboratory experiments are traditionally used in schools, virtual laboratories have entered today’s classrooms, due to their specific affordances. In this study, we compared the effect of using hands-on and virtual laboratories in isolation to two different combinations on middle school (7th grade) students’ acquisition of conceptual knowledge and inquiry skills. Our findings indicate that using hands-on and virtual laboratories sequentially instead of in isolation gives better results for students’ acquisition of knowledge and inquiry skills. This result, together with similar findings from other studies, suggests that virtual and hands-on laboratories may have complementary affordances. In the current study, no advantage was seen for either of the two different combinations used.
KeywordsVirtual laboratory Hands-on laboratory Conceptual knowledge Inquiry skills Science teaching
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in the current study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and ministry of national education research committee.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aydoğdu, B. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde kullanılan farklı deney tekniklerinin öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerine, bilimin doğasına yönelik görüşlerine, laboratuvara yönelik tutumlarına ve öğrenme yaklaşımlarına etkileri [The effects of different laboratory techniques used in science courses on students’ science process skills, views toward nature of science, attitudes toward laboratory and learning approaches in science and technology course; unpublished doctoral thesis]. Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Chini, J. J., Madsen, A., Gire, E., Rebello, N. S., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 8, 1–12.Google Scholar
- de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2014). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, W. Schnotz, & J. Elen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 371–390). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Go-Lab Sharing and Authoring Platform. (2015). https://www.golabz.eu/ Accessed 6 April 2018.
- Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In B. E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 67–77). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarthy-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and science curriculum (pp. 159–182). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hovardas, T., Xenofontos, N. A., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2017). Using virtual labs in an inquiry context: the effect of a hypothesis formulation tool and an experiment design tool on students’ learning. In I. Levin & D. Tsybulsky (Eds.), Optimizing STEM education with advanced ICTs and simulations (pp. 58–83). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perry, J., Meir, E., Herron, J. C., Maruca, S., & Stal, D. (2008). Evaluating two approaches to helping college students understand evolutionary trees through diagramming tasks. CBE-Life Science Education, 7, 193–201.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1936). The origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Polman, J. L. (1999). Designing project-based science: connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Sencar Tokgöz, S. (2007). The effect of peer instruction on sixth grade students’ science achievement and attitudes (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Smith, G. W., & Puntambekar, S. (2010). Examining the combination of physical and virtual experiments in an inquiry science classroom. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
- Taş, U. E., Arıcı, Ö., Ozarkan, H. B., & Özgürlük, B. (2016). PISA 2015 ulusal raporu [National report of PISA 2015]. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of National Education.Google Scholar
- Wang, T.-L., & Tseng, Y.-K. (2018). The comparative effectiveness of physical, virtual, and virtual-physical manipulatives on third-grade students’ science achievement and conceptual understanding of evaporation and condensation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yıldırım, A., Özgürlük, B., Parlak, B., Gönen, E., & Polat, M. (2016). TIMMS 2015 ulusal matematik ve fen bilimleri ön raporu 4. ve 8.sınıflar [Pre-report of TIMMS 2015 national mathematics and science 4th and 8th grades]. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of National Education.Google Scholar
- Zacharia, Z. C., & Michael, M. (2016). Using physical and virtual manipulatives to improve primary school students’ understanding of concepts of electric circuits. In M. Riopel & Z. Smyrnaiou (Eds.), New developments in science and technology education (pp. 125–140). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar