Advertisement

Nonequilibrium Free Energy Methods Applied to Magnetic Systems: The Degenerate Ising Model

  • Samuel CajahuaringaEmail author
  • Alex Antonelli
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we review the physical concepts of the nonequilibrium techniques for the calculation of free energies applied to magnetic systems using Monte Carlo simulations of different nonequilibrium processes. The methodology allows the calculation of the free energy difference between two different system Hamiltonians, as well as the free energy dependence on temperature and magnetic field for a given Hamiltonian. As an illustration of the effectiveness of this approach, we apply the methodologies to determine the phase diagram of a simple microscopic model, the degenerate Ising model. Our results show very good agreement with those obtained from analytical (theoretical) methods.

Keywords

Free energy Monte Carlo Ising model Phase transition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Brazilian agencies CNPq, CAPES, and FAPESP under Grants #2010/16970-0, #2013/08293-7, and #2016/23891-6. The calculations were performed at CCJDR-IFGW-UNICAMP and at CENAPAD-SP in Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    Adkins, C.J.: Equilibrium Thermodynamics, 3rd edn. Cambrigde University Press, Cambrigde (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baxter, R.J.: Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics. Academic Press, Cambridge (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brito, B.G.A., Antonelli, A.: Efficient method to include nuclear quantum effects in the determination of phase boundaries. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 034111 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cajahuaringa, S., Antonelli, A.: Stochastic sampling of the isothermal-isobaric ensemble: phase diagram of crystalline solids from molecular dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 064114 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castellano, G.: Thermodynamic potentials for simple magnetic systems. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 260, 146 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coey, J.M.D.: Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Koning, M.: Optimizing the driving function for nonequilibrium free-energy calculations in the linear regime: a variational approach. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 104106 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Koning, M., Antonelli, A.: Adiabatic switching applied to realistic crystalline solids: Vacancy-formation free energy in copper. Phys. Rev. B 55, 735 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Koning, M., Antonelli, A., Yip, S.: Optimized free-energy evaluation using a single reversible-scaling simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3973 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Koning, M., Cai, W., Antonelli, A., Yip, S.: Efficient freeenergy calculations by the simulation of nonequilibrium processes. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2, 88–96 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Koning, M., Antonelli, A., Yip, S.: Single-simulation determination of phase boundaries: a dynamic clausius-clapeyron integration method. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 11025 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferdinand, A.E., Fisher, M.E.: Bounded and inhomogeneous Ising models. I. specific-heat anomaly of a finite lattice. Phys. Rev. 185, 832 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freitas, R., Asta, M., de Koning, M.: Nonequilibrium free-energy calculation of solids using lammps. Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 333–341 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frenkel, D., Smit, B.: Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garcez, K.M.S., Antonelli, A.: Pressure effects on the transitions between disordered phases in supercooled liquid silicon. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 204508 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, R.: A study of first- and second-order phase transitions using monte carlo simulations in the micro-canonical ensemble. Phys. Lett. A 111, 299 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miranda, C.R., Antonelli, A.: Transitions between disordered phases in supercooled liquid silicon. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 11672 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paula Leite, R., Freitas, R., Azevedo, R., de Koning, M.: The uhlenbeck-ford model: Exact virial coefficients and application as a reference system in fluid-phase free-energy calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 194101 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pessoa, R., de Koning, M., Vitiello, S.A.: Zero-point vacancy concentration in a model quantum solid: a reversible-work approach. J. Stat. Phys. 134, 769 (2009)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pippard, A.: Elements of Classical Thermodynamics for Advanced Students of Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Planes, A., Vives, E.: Entropic formulation of statistical mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 106, 827–850 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramírez, R., Herrero, C.P., Antonelli, A., Hernández, E.R.: Path integral calculation of free energies: Quantum effects on the melting temperature of neon. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 064110 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schebarchov, D., Schulze, T.P., Hendy, S.C.: Degenerate ising model for atomistic simulation of crystal-melt interfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 074704 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watanabe, M., Reinhardt, W.P.: Direct dynamical calculation of entropy and free energy by adiabatic switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3301 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Física Gleb WataghinUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin and Center for Computing in Engineering & SciencesUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations