Advertisement

Accessibility Percolation with Crossing Valleys on n-ary Trees

  • Frank Duque
  • Alejandro Roldán-CorreaEmail author
  • Leon A. Valencia
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we study a variation of the accessibility percolation model. This work is also motivated by evolutionary biology and evolutionary computation. Consider a tree whose vertices are labeled with random numbers. We study the probability of having a monotone subsequence of a path from the root to a leaf, where any k consecutive vertices in the path contain at least one vertex of the subsequence. An n-ary tree, with height h, is a tree whose vertices at distance at most \(h-1\) to the root have n children. For the case of n-ary trees, we prove that, as h tends to infinity, the probability of having such subsequence: tends to 1, if n grows significantly faster than \(\root k \of {h/(ek)}\); and tends to 0, if n grows significantly slower than \(\root k \of {h/(ek)}\).

Keywords

Percolation Dynamics of evolution Fitness landscape 

Mathematics Subject Classification

60K35 60C05 92D15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Ricardo Restrepo and Daya K. Nagar for helpful discussions. Thanks are due to the anonymous referees for their careful reading, criticism and suggestions which helped us to considerably improve the paper. Research Partially supported by FORDECYT 265667 (Mexico). Research Partially supported by Universidad de Antioquia (Colombia).

References

  1. 1.
    Berestycki, J., Brunet, E., Shi, Z.: The number of accessible paths in the hypercube. Bernoulli 22(2), 653–680 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berestycki, J., Brunet, É., Shi, Z.: Accessibility percolation with backsteps. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat 14, 45–62 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franke, J., Klözer, A., de Visser, J.A.G.M., Krug, J.: Evolutionary accessibility of mutational pathways. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7(8), 1–9 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gillespie, J.H.: Molecular evolution over the mutational landscape. Evolution 38(5), 1116–1129 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hegarty, P., Martinsson, A.: On the existence of accessible paths in various models of fitness landscapes. Ann. Appl. Probab. 24(4), 1375–1395 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, L.: Phase transition for accessibility percolation on hypercubes. J. Theor. Probab. 31, 2072–2111 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martinsson, A.: Accessibility percolation and first-passage site percolation on the unoriented binary hypercube. arXiv:1501.02206 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nowak, S., Krug, J.: Accessibility percolation on n-trees. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 101(6), 66004 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richter, H., Engelbrecht, A.: Recent advances in the theory and application of fitness landscapes. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberts, M., Zhao, L.: Increasing paths in regular trees. Electron. Commun. Probab. 18(87), 1–10 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stadler, P.F., Stephens, C.R.: Landscapes and effective fitness. Comment Theor. Biol. 8((4–5)), 389–431 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinreich, D.M., Chao, L.: Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature. Evolution 59(6), 1175–1182 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weinreich, D.M., Watson, R.A., Chao, L.: Perspective:sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59, 1165–1174 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinreich, D.M., Delaney, N.F., DePristo, M.A., Hartl, D.L.: Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312(5770), 111–114 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weissman, D.W., Desai, M.M., Fisher, D.S., Feldman, M.W.: The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. Theor. Popul. Biol. 75, 286–300 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wright, S.: The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. Sixth Int. Congress Genet. 1, 356–366 (1932)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Matemáticas UNAM and Instituto de Física UASLPMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de MatemáticasUniversidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations