Advertisement

Local site conditions modeling in stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth seismic source

  • Anabella CoțovanuEmail author
  • Radu Vacareanu
Short Communication
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Analyses of stochastic simulations methods for Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth earthquake recorded at seismic station INCERC Bucharest were made. The main research topic highlighted in this paper is the quest for the best model able to simulate the influence of the local site conditions considering to this aim different types of soil behavior. Two types of linear behavior and one type of nonlinear behavior of the soil layers were considered to investigate the site effects. Comparisons between the simulations and the recorded accelerograms and between the simulation methods were made in terms of amplitude parameters, frequency content, duration parameters, and energy release. A better approximation was found when the nonlinear behavior of the soil layers was employed.

Keywords

Stochastic simulation Vrancea earthquakes Strong motion Local site conditions 

Notes

References

  1. Benetatos CA, Kiratzi AA (2004) Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of intermediate depth earthquakes: the cases of the 30 May 1990 Vrancea (Romania) and of the 22 January 2002 Karpathos island (Greece) earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998) FINSIM--a FORTRAN Program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults.  https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.69.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of groundmotion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boore DM (2005) SMSIM-Fortran programs for simulating ground motions form earthquakes. Version 7.04. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-Field Report. pp. 55Google Scholar
  5. Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3202-3216Google Scholar
  6. Constantinescu L, Enescu E (1985) Vrancea earthquakes from scientific and technologic point of view. “Academiei” Editing House.Google Scholar
  7. EXSIM Online Software (n.d.) http://www.daveboore.com/. Accessed 01 September 2018
  8. Ganas A, Grecu B, Batsi E, Radulian M (2010) Vrancea slab earthquake triggerd by static stress transfer. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2565–2577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gusev A, Radulian M, Rizescu M, Panza GF (2002) Source scaling of intermediate-depth Vrancea earthquakes. Geophys J Int 151(3):879–889.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01816.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haghshenas E, Bard PY, Theodoulidis N, SESAME WP04 Team (2008) Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio. Bull Earthq Eng 6:78–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotke AR, Rathje EM (2009) Technical manual for Strata. PEER Report 2008/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin M, Wenzel F (2006) High-resolution teleseismic body wave tomography beneath SE-Romania (II): imaging of a slab detachment scenario. Geophys J Int 164(3):579–595.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02884.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oncescu MC, Bonjer KP (1997) A note on the depth recurrence and strain release of large Vrancea earthquakes. Tectonophysics. 272:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oth A, Wenzel F, Radulian M (2007) Source parameters of intermediate-depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes from empirical Green’s functions modeling. Tectonophysics. 438(1-4):33–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oth A, Parolai S, Bindi D, Wenzel F (2009) Source spectra and site response from S waves of intermediate-depth Vrancea, Romania, earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pavel F (2015) Investigation on the stochastic simulation of strong ground motions for Bucharest area. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:227–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pavel F (2017) Investigation on the variability of simulated and observed ground motions for Bucharest Area. J Earthq Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pavel F, Văcăreanu R (2015a) Assessment of the ground motion levels for the Vrancea (Romania) November 1940 earthquake. Nat Hazards 78:1469–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1767-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pavel F, Văcăreanu R (2015b) Kappa and regional attenuation for Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. J Seismol 19(3):791–799.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9490-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavel F, Vacareanu R (2017) Ground motion simulations for seismic stations in southern and eastern Romania and seismic hazard assessment. J Seismol 21:1023–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9649-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pavel F, Popa V, Vacareanu F (2018) Evaluation of soil conditions in Bucharest, In book: Impact of long-period ground motions on structural design: a case study for Bucharest, Romania,  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_2 Google Scholar
  24. Pitilakis K (2004) Chapter 5: Site effects. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 139–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radulian M, Bala A, Ardeleanu L, Toma-Danila D, Petrescu L, Popescu E (2019) Revised catalogue of earthquake mechanisms for the events occurred in Romania until the end of twentieth century: REFMC. Acta Geodaetica Geophys 54(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report EERC 70-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  27. SMSIM Online Software (n.d.) http://www.daveboore.com/. Accessed 01 September 2018
  28. Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Wenzel F, Grecu B, Radulian M (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the intermediate depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117:89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.“Ferdinand I” Military Technical AcademyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations