Recently, a family of analytic wavelets known as generalized Morse wavelets (GMW) has been established in the literature. This versatile wavelet family uses two parameters (γ and β) to adjust its frequency or time domain properties. By varying these two parameters, this wavelet family includes many commonly used analytic wavelets. In this paper, GMW are examined, along with the continuous wavelet transform (CWT), to determine their suitability for extraction of ground motion pulses from a suite of acceleration records. GMW are compared to a popular pulse model that has recently been adapted for wavelet analysis in the literature. It is shown, based on two different metrics, that GMW performs comparably with the other model for this suite of ground motions. Since CWT is repeated with different wavelet parameters for each ground motion, the parameter selection and pulse extraction process are examined. It is shown that using the maximum wavelet coefficient alone does not allow for the extraction of pulses that best match the time series or the spectral response. Alternative criteria are proposed in order to optimize pulse selection using performance-based metrics.
Pulse model Near fault CWT Morse wavelets
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The author would like to thank Nicos Makris and Michalis Vassiliou for their 2011 work which inspired many aspects of this manuscript. The author is also grateful to Michalis Vassiliou for sharing his Matlab code and the two anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments have greatly improved the manuscript.
Baker JW (2007) Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1486–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(11):815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahi SK, Baker JW (2014) An efficient algorithm to identify strong velocity pulses in multi-component ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(5):2456–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang Y, Zhang J (2011) Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(61–78):1998Google Scholar