Earthquake accelerogram denoising by wavelet-based variational mode decomposition
- 68 Downloads
Earthquake acceleration time chronicles records are important sources of information in the field of tremor engineering and engineering seismology. High frequency noise could considerably reduce P phase picking accuracy and the time. Accurate detection of P phase and onset time arrival picking is very important for the earthquake signal analysis and prediction problem. Large number of those records are defiled with noise so appropriate denoising method is impulse for the exact investigation of the information. Polish off of non-stationary and high energy noise from the recorded signal is challenging with preservation of original features. In this paper, we propose a method to denoise the signal based on variational mode decomposition and continuous wavelet transform. Noisy signal is disintegrated into intrinsic mode function by variational mode decomposition. The probability density function of noisy signal and each intrinsic mode functions is calculated using Kernel density estimation and then Manhattan distance. The probability density function helps us to identify the relevant mode and high frequency noisy intrinsic mode functions, so the continuous wavelet transform is applied to the selected mode. We observed the effect of noise and denoising method on parameters like acceleration and displacement response spectra. The experiments on synthetic and real earthquake accelerograms validate ameliorate result of the proposed method.
KeywordsEarthquake accelerogram Seismic noise Continuous wavelet transform Variational mode decomposition
The authors would like to thank the Department of Mine and Geology, Nepal, for providing the real earthquake accelerogram data, and thank to Wenlong Wang and Yuhan Shui for the helpful discussions.
This study is supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2017YFB0202900, NSFC under Grant 41625017 and 41804102.
- Ansari A, Noorzad A, Zafarani A, Hessam V (2010) Correction of highly noisy strong motion records using a modified wavelet de-noising method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng: 1168–1181Google Scholar
- Carter JA, Barstow N, Pomeroy PW, Chael EP, Leahy PJ (1991) High frequency seismic noise as a function of depth. Bull Seismal Soc Am 81(4):1101–1114Google Scholar
- Chen Y, Ma J, Fomel S (2016) Double-sparsity dictionary for seismic noise attenuation. Geophysics 81(2):17–30Google Scholar
- Daubechies I, Heil C (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. Computers in physics: AIP PublishingGoogle Scholar
- Huang N, Shen Z, Long S, Wu M, Shih H, Zheng Q, Yen N, Tung C, Liu H (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings The Royal Society 454(1971)Google Scholar
- Komaty A, Boudraa AQ, Augier B, Dare-Emzivat D (2014) EMD Based filtering using similarity measure between probability density functions of IMFs - IEEE transactions on intrumention and measurement 63:27–34Google Scholar
- Guo Y, Kareem A (2016) Generation of artificial earthquake records with a non stationary Kanai - Tamiji model. Eng Struct 23(7):827–837Google Scholar
- Murphy AJ, Savino JR (1975) A comprehensive study of long period (20-200 s) Earth noise at the high gain worldwide seismograph stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1827–1862Google Scholar
- Torres M, Colominas M, Schlotthauer G, Flandrin P (2011) A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In: IEEE international conference on acoustic speech and signal processing, pp 4144–4147Google Scholar
- Young ChJ, Chael EP, Withers MW, Aster RC (1996) A comparison of the high- frequency (> 1 H z) surface and subsurface noise environment at three sites in the United States. Bull Seism Soc Am 86, 5:1516–1528Google Scholar
- Yu S, Ma J (2017) Complex variational mode decomposition for slop preserving denoising. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 99:1–12Google Scholar