Journal of Seismology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 319–340 | Cite as

Geometry and Paleoseismology of the Malatya Fault (Malatya-Ovacık Fault Zone), Eastern Turkey: Implications for intraplate deformation of the Anatolian Scholle

  • Taylan SançarEmail author
  • Cengiz Zabcı
  • Volkan Karabacak
  • Müge Yazıcı
  • H. Serdar Akyüz


The sinistral Malatya-Ovacık Fault Zone (MOFZ) is one of the outstanding intraplate deformation belts within Anatolia. The 165-km-long, NE–SW-striking Malatya Fault (MF), which constitutes the southern section of the MOFZ, is separated into five segments according to its surface geometry. These segments have evident morphotectonic features that reflect long- and short-term fault activity, such as morphologic structures offset by as little as 7 m and as much as 7.3 km. This study provides results from the first paleoseismological investigations on the MF. We find that the last earthquake occurred between 965 and 549 BCE and calculate a recurrence interval of 2275 ± 605 years from evidence for four paleo-events over the last 10 ka. Considering fault segmentation and our paleoseismological data, we propose that the accumulated strain on the MF may cause a destructive earthquake (M = 7.4) in the near future. Our results support the hypotheses that the MF and other NW-striking dextral and NE-striking sinistral strike-slip faults within the eastern part of Anatolia are plate boundary-related, active deformational structures.


Malatya fault Paleoseismology Earthquake Intraplate deformation Turkey 



Some figures in this paper were generated using the public domain software Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (Wessel et al. 2013). The authors are thankful to the Governorship of the Malatya, Mehmet ERTÜRK from the Disaster and Emergency Management Authority of Malatya and the people of the Arguvan for their great support during our field studies. The authors are grateful to Lindsay M. Schoenbohm and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments and suggestions that significantly improved the manuscript.


This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) grant no. 114Y580.


  1. AFAD (2012) Son 48 saatte 48 deprem (48 earthquakes in the last 48 hours). Accessed: 26.11.2018Google Scholar
  2. Aktuğ B, Dikmen U, Dogru A, Ozener H (2013a) Seismicity and strain accumulation around Karliova triple junction (Turkey). J Geodyn 67:21–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aktuğ B, Parmaksiz E, Kurt M, Lenk O, Kiliçoğlu A, Gürdal MA, Özdemir S (2013b) Deformation of Central Anatolia: GPS implications. J Geodyn 67:78–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akyüz HS, Altunel E, Karabacak V, Yalçıner CC (2006) Historical earthquake activity of the northern part of the Dead Sea fault zone, Southern Turkey. Tectonophysics 426:281–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akyüz HS, Uçarkuş G, Altunel E, Doğan B, Dikbaş A (2012) Paleoseismological investigations on a slow-moving active fault in Central Anatolia, Tecer fault. Sivas Annales of Geophysics 55:847–857Google Scholar
  6. Arger J, Mitchell JG, Westaway R (1996) Neogene and quaternary volcanism of eastern Turkey: potassium-argon dating and its tectonic implications vol 1996/1. Technoscience. Newcastle upon Tyne. UK. Open-file Science ReportsGoogle Scholar
  7. Arpat E, Şaroğlu F (1975) Türkiye’deki bazi önemli genç tektonik olaylar (On some important young tectonic events in Turkey). Bull Geol Soc Turk 18:29–41Google Scholar
  8. Avagyan A, Sosson M, Karakhanian A, Philip H, Rebai S, Rolland Y, Melkonyan R, Davtyan V (2010) Recent tectonic stress evolution in the lesser Caucasus and adjacent regions. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 340:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barka A, Akyüz HS, Cohen HA, Watchorn F (2000) Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Tasova-Erbaa pull-apart basins, North Anatolian fault zone: their significance for the motion of the Anatolian block. Tectonophysics 322:243–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barka AA, Gülen L (1988) New constraints on age and total offset of the North Anatolian Fault Zone: implications for tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region In: 1987 Melin Tokay Symposium. Spec. Publ. Middle-east Technical University, Ankara, pp 39–65Google Scholar
  11. Barka AA, Kadinsky-Cade K (1988) Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics 7:663–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey; a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronk Ramsey C, Lee S (2013) Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55:2–3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chorowicz J, Dhont D, Gündogdu N (1999) Neotectonics in the eastern north Anatolian fault region (Turkey) advocates crustal extension: mapping from SAR ERS imagery and digital elevation model. J Struct Geol 21:511–532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey JF, Şengör AMC (1979) Aegean and surrounding regions: complex multiplate and continuum tectonics in a convergent zone. Geol Soc Am Bull 90:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duman TY, Emre Ö (2013) The east Anatolian fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. In: Robertson AHF, Parlak O, Ünlügenç¸ UC (eds) Geological development of Anatolia and the easternmost Mediterranean region, vol 372. Geological Society, Special Publications, London, pp 495–529Google Scholar
  17. Ekici T, Alpaslan M, Parlak O, Temel A (2007) Geochemistry of the Pliocene basalts erupted along the Malatya-Ovacık fault zone (MOFZ), eastern Anatolia, Turkey: implications for source characteristics and partial melting processes. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 67:201–212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200–201:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emre Ö, Duman TY, Elmaci H, Özalp S, Olgun Ş (2012a) 1:250,000 scale active fault map series of Turkey, Malatya (NJ 37-6) quadrangle. Serial number: 42. General Directorate of Mineral Res Explor, Ankara-Turkey,Google Scholar
  20. Emre Ö, Duman TY, Kondo H, Olgun Ş, Özalp S, Elmaci H (2012b) 1:250,000 Scale Active Fault Map Series of Turkey,Erzincan (NJ 37-3) Quadrangle. Serial Number: 44. General Directorate of Mineral Res Explor, Ankara -Turkey,Google Scholar
  21. Faccenna C, Becker TW, Jolivet L, Keskin M (2013) Mantle convection in the Middle East: reconciling Afar upwelling, Arabia indentation and Aegean trench rollback. Earth Planet Sci Lett 375:254–269. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall J, Aksu AE, Elitez I, Yaltirak C, Çifçi G (2014) The Fethiye–Burdur fault zone: a component of upper plate extension of the subduction transform edge propagator fault linking Hellenic and Cyprus arcs, eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics 635:80–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins M, Schoenbohm LM, Brocard G, Kaymakci N, Gosse JC, Cosca MA (2015) New kinematic and geochronologic evidence for the quaternary evolution of the central Anatolian fault zone (CAFZ). Tectonics 34:2118–2141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubert-Ferrari A, King G, Jvd W, Villa I, Altunel E, Armijo R (2009) Long-term evolution of the north Anatolian fault: new constraints from its eastern termination. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 311:133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson J, McKenzie D (1984) Active tectonics of the alpine–Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan. Geophys J R Astron Soc 77:185–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaffey N, Robertson AHF (2001) New sedimentological and structural data from the Ecemiş fault zone, southern Turkey: implications for its timing and offset and the Cenozoic tectonic escape of Anatolia. J Geol Soc 158:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaymakçı N, İnceöz M, Ertepınar P (2006) 3D- architecture and Neogene evolution of the Malatya Basin: inferences for the kinematics of the Malatya and Ovacık fault zones. Turk J Earth Sci 15:123–154Google Scholar
  28. King G, Nabelek J (1985) Role of fault bends in the initiation and termination of earthquake rupture. Science 228:984–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koçyiğit A, Beyhan A (1998) A new intra-continental transcurrent structure: the central Anatolian fault zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 284:317–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozacı O, Dolan JF, Finkel RC (2009) A late Holocene slip rate for the central north Anatolian fault, at Tahtaköprü, Turkey, from cosmogenic 10Be geochronology: implications for fault loading and strain release rates. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 114:1–12Google Scholar
  31. Kürüm S, Önal A, Boztuğ D, Spell T, Arslan M (2008) 40Ar/39Ar age and geochemistry of the post-collisional Miocene Yamadağ Volcanics in the Arapkir area (Malatya Province), eastern Anatolia, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 33:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Pichon X, Chamot-Rooke NLS, Noomen R, Veis G (1995) Geodetic determination of the kinematics of Central Greece with respect to Europe: implications for eastern Mediterranean tectonics. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100:12675–12690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Pichon X, Kreemer C (2010) The Miocene-to-present kinematic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East and its implications for dynamics. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 38:323–351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka A, Demir C, Ergintav S, Georgiev I, Gurkan O, Hamburger M, Hurst K, Kahle H, Kastens K, Kekelidze G, King R, Kotzev V, Lenk O, Mahmoud S, Mishin A, Nadariya M, Ouzounis A, Paradissis D, Peter Y, Prilepin M, Reilinger R, Sanli I, Seeger H, Tealeb A, Toksöz MN, Veis G (2000) Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKenzie D (1972) Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geophys J R Astron Soc 30:109–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muehlberger WR, Gordon MB (1987) Observations on the complexity of the east anatolian fault. Turkey J Struct Geol 9:899–903. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nyst M, Thatcher W (2004) New constraints on the active tectonic deformation of the Aegean. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 109:n/a. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Özener H, Arpat E, Ergintav S, Dogru A, Cakmak R, Turgut B, Dogan U (2010) Kinematics of the eastern part of the north Anatolian fault zone. J Geodyn 49:141–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Özeren MS, Holt WE (2010) The dynamics of the eastern Mediterranean and eastern Turkey. Geophys J Int 183:1165–1184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Philip H, Cisternas A, Gvishiani A, Gorshkov A (1989) The Caucasus: an actual example of the initial stages of continental collision. Tectonophysics 161:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reilinger R, McClusky S, Vernant P, Lawrence S, Ergintav S, Cakmak R, Ozener H, Kadirov F, Guliev I, Stepanyan R, Nadariya M, Hahubia G, Mahmoud S, Sakr K, ArRajehi A, Paradissis D, al-Aydrus A, Prilepin M, Guseva T, Evren E, Dmitrotsa A, Filikov SV, Gomez F, al-Ghazzi R, Karam G (2006) GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J Geophys Res 111:B05411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Ramsey CB, Buck CE, Cheng H, Edwards RL, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Haflidason H, Hajdas I, Hatté C, Heaton TJ, Hoffmann DL, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, Manning SW, Niu M, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Scott EM, Southon JR, Staff RA, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J (2013) IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarıkaya MA, Yıldırım C, Çiner A (2015) No surface breaking on the Ecemiş fault, Central Turkey, since Late Pleistocene (~64.5 ka); new geomorphic and geochronologic data from cosmogenic dating of offset alluvial fans. Tectonophysics 649:33–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Kuşçu İ (1992) Türkiye Diri fay Haritasi (active Faut map of Turkey), scale 1:2000000, one sheet. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  45. Şaroğlu F, Güner Y (1979) Tutak Diri Fayi. Özellikleri ve Çaldiran Fayi ile ilişkisi Yeryuvari ve İnsan 4:11–14Google Scholar
  46. Scholz CH (2002) The mechanics of earthquake and faulting 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
  47. Scholz CH, Aviles CA, Wesnousky SG (1986) Scaling differences between large interplate and intraplate earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:65–70Google Scholar
  48. Schwartz DP, Coppersmith KJ (1986) Seismic hazards: new trends in analysis using geologic data. In: Active tectonics. National Academy Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  49. Searle MP, Chung S-L, Lo C-H (2010) Geological offsets and age constraints along the northern Dead Sea fault, Syria. J Geol Soc 167:1001–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Segall P, Pollard DD (1980) Mechanics of discontinuous faults. J Geophys Res 85:4337–4350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Şengör AMC (1979) The north Anatolian transform fault; its age, offset and tectonic significance journal of the Geological Society of London 136. Part 3:269–282Google Scholar
  52. Şengör AMC (1980) Türkiye Neotektoniğinin Esaslari (Principles of the Neotectonism of Turkey) Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Yayini, 40Google Scholar
  53. Şengör AMC, Görür N, Şaroğlu F (1985) Strike slip faulting and related basin formations in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: Biddle KT, Christie-Blick N (eds) Strike-slip faulting and basin formation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, special publication no. 37, pp 227 – 264Google Scholar
  54. Şengör AMC, Grall C, İmren C, le Pichon X, Görür N, Henry P, Karabulut H, Siyako M (2014) The geometry of the north Anatolian transform fault in the sea of Marmara and its temporal evolution: implications for the development of intracontinental transform faults. Can J Earth Sci 51:222–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Şengör AMC, Özeren MS, Keskin M, Sakınç M, Özbakır AD, Kayan İ (2008) Eastern Turkish high plateau as a small Turkic-type orogen: implications for post-collisional crust-forming processes in Turkic-type orogens. Earth Sci Rev 90:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Şengör AMC, Tüysüz O, İmren C, Sakinç M, Eyidoğan H, Görür N, le Pichon X, Rangin C (2005) The north Anatolian fault: a new look. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:37–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Şengör AMC, Yılmaz Y (1981) Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics 75:181–190, 193–199, 203–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shaw B, Jackson J (2010) Earthquake mechanisms and active tectonics of the Hellenic subduction zone. Geophys J Int 181:966–984. Google Scholar
  59. Sibson RH (1986) Earthquakes and lineament infrastructure. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Series A Math Phys Sci 317:63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stein S (2007) Approaches to continental intraplate earthquake issues. In: Stein S, Mazzotti S (eds) Continental intraplate earthquakes: science, hazard, and policy issues. Geological Society of America,Google Scholar
  61. Sümengen M (2016) 1/100.000 ölçekli Türkiye Jeoloji Hatitalari Serisi, Malatya L40paftasi, No:238 Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  62. Tatar O, Poyraz F, Gürsoy H, Cakir Z, Ergintav S, Akpinar Z, Koçbulut F, Sezen F, Türk T, Hastaoğlu KÖ, Polat A, Mesci BL, Gürsoy Ö, Ayazli İE, Çakmak R, Belgen A, Yavaşoğlu H (2012) Crustal deformation and kinematics of the eastern part of the north Anatolian fault zone (Turkey) from GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 518–521:55–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Triep EG, Sykes LR (1997) Frequency of occurrence of moderate to great earthquakes in intracontinental regions: implications for changes in stress, earthquake prediction, and hazards assessments. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102:9923–9948. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Varnes, D. J., 1962, Analysis of plastic deformation according to Von Mises’ theory, with application to the South Silverton area, San Juan County, Colorado: USGS Professional Paper, v. 378-BGoogle Scholar
  65. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002Google Scholar
  66. Wesnousky SG (2006) Predicting the endpoints of earthquake ruptures. Nature 444:358–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis J, Wobbe F (2013) Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 94:409–410. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westaway R (1994) Present-day kinematics of the Middle East and eastern Mediterranean. J Geophys Res 99:12071–12090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Westaway R (2004) Kinematic consistency between the Dead Sea fault zone and the Neogene and quaternary left-lateral faulting in SE Turkey. Tectonophysics 391:203–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Westaway R, Arger J (1996) The Gölbaşi basin, southeastern Turkey: a complex discontinuity in a major strike-slip fault zone. J Geol Soc Lond 153:729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Westaway R, Arger J (2001) Kinematics of the Malatya-Ovacık fault zone. Geodin Acta 14:103–131Google Scholar
  72. Westaway R, Demir T, Seyrek A (2008) Geometry of the Turkey-Arabia and Africa-Arabia plate boundaries in the latest Miocene to mid-Pliocene: the role of the Malatya-Ovacık fault zone in eastern Turkey. eEarth 3:27–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Westaway R, Demir T, Seyrek A, Beck A (2006) Kinematics of active left-lateral faulting in SE Turkey from offset Pleistocene river gorges: improved constraint on the rate and history of relative motion between the Turkish and Arabian plates. J Geol Soc 163:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Westaway R (2003) Kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean updated. Turk J Earth Sci 12:5–46Google Scholar
  75. Yazıcı M, Zabcı C, Sançar T, Natalin BA (2018) The role of intraplate strike-slip faults in shaping the surrounding morphology: the Ovacık fault (eastern Turkey) as a case study. Geomorphology 321:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yıldırım C (2014) Relative tectonic activity assessment of the Tuz Gölü fault zone; Central Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics 630:183–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yıldırım C, Sarıkaya MA, Çiner A (2016) Late Pleistocene intraplate extension of the central Anatolian plateau, Turkey: inferences from cosmogenic exposure dating of alluvial fan, landslide, and moraine surfaces along the Ecemiş fault zone. Tectonics 35:1446–1464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zabcı C, Sançar T, Tikhomirov D, Ivy-Och S, Vockenhuber C, Friedrich AM, Yazıcı, M, Akcar, N (2017) Cosmogenic 36 Cl geochronology of offset terraces along the Ovacık Fault (Malatya-Ovacık Fault Zone, Eastern Turkey): Implications for the intra-plate deformation of the Anatolian Scholle. Paper presented at the International Conference on Astronomy & Geophysics in Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar-MongoliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taylan Sançar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cengiz Zabcı
    • 2
  • Volkan Karabacak
    • 3
  • Müge Yazıcı
    • 2
  • H. Serdar Akyüz
    • 2
  1. 1.Munzur ÜniversitesiAktulukTurkey
  2. 2.İstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiİstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Eskişehir Osmangazi ÜniversitesiEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations