Simulating the near-fault large velocity pulses of the Chi-Chi (Mw7.6) earthquake with kinematic model
- 259 Downloads
The large number of pulses recorded during the 1999 Mw7.6 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake provided an important data for this study. The prediction of near-fault velocity pulses generated by large earthquakes can provide some reference for the Engineering anti-earthquake design. Based on the established source model and velocity structure model, this paper attempts to use the 3D finite difference method to simulate the 39 near-fault large velocity pulses. The conclusions are the following: (1) Two-segment “shovel-like” fault model constructed by 3D bending plane can better describe the characteristics of the underground real fault. (2) The seismic moment and rise time of the six asperities determine the peak and period of the velocity pulse. The asperities located at shallow low angle mainly affect the horizontal pulse components, and the asperities at high angle contribute more to the vertical pulse component. (3) The difference in sliding properties between the north and south ends of the fault causes a difference in the horizontal pulse components, reflecting the characteristics of the fling-step effect and directivity effect. (4) The characteristic period of the velocity response spectrum has the maximum near the turning point at the north end of the fault and shows a very obvious hanging wall effect in the near-fault region, resulting in the large-scale structures having severe damage because of large resonance effect. (5) Peak ground velocity (PGV) gradually increases from south to north along the fault and PGV on the hanging wall is significantly larger than PGV on the footwall, and the distribution of the pulses in front of the rupture is wider than that of the rear. Because the simulation results are basically consistent with the real records, this also verifies the feasibility of simulating pulse-like ground motions with the 3D finite difference method.
KeywordsChi-Chi earthquake Finite difference method Large velocity pulse Source model Velocity structure model
The GMS software used for numerical simulation is provided by the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience in Japan. The earthquake records come from the Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan (http://scweb.cwb.gov.tw/). The authors thank the reviewers for their very helpful comments.
This research work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (51678537) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC1500205).
- Aoi S, Fujiwara H (1999) 3D finite difference method using discontinuous grids. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(4):918–930Google Scholar
- Aoi S, Maeda T, Nishizawa N, Aoki T (2012) Large-scale ground motion simulation using GPGPU, AGU, Fall Meeting, S53G-06Google Scholar
- Ding HP, Liu QF, Jin X (2006) A method of numerical simulation for long-period strong ground motion by 3-D FEM. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 26(5):27–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Gao MT, Yu YX, Zhang XM, Wu J, Hu P, Ding YH (2002) Three-dimensional finite-difference simulations of ground motions in the Beijing area. Earthq Res Chin 18(4):356–364 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Graves RW (1998) Three-dimensional finite-difference modeling of the San Andreas fault: source parameterization and ground motion levels. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(4):881–897Google Scholar
- Guatteri M, Spudich P (1998) Coseismic temporal changes of slip direction: the effect of absolute stress on dynamic rupture. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(3):777–789Google Scholar
- Huang CT, Chen SS (2000) Near-field characteristics and engineering implications of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Seismol 2(1):23–41Google Scholar
- Hung J, Suppe J (2002) Subsurface geometry of the Sani-Chelungpu faults and fold scarp formation in the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake, AGU, Fall Meeting, T61B-1268Google Scholar
- Irikura K, Miyakoshi K, Kamae K, Yoshida K, Somei K, Kurahashi S, Miyake H (2017) Applicability of source scaling relations for crustal earthquakes to estimation of the ground motions of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. Earth Planets Space 69(10):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0586-y Google Scholar
- Maeda T, Morikawa N, Iwaki A, Aoi S, Fujiwara H (2014) Simulation-based hazard assessment for long-period ground motions of the Nankai Trough megathrust earthquake, AGU, Fall Meeting, S31C-4438Google Scholar
- Ohminato T, Chouet B (1997) A free-surface boundary condition for including 3D topography in the finite-difference method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(2):494–515Google Scholar
- Wang WM, Zhao LF, Li J, Yao ZX (2005) Rupture process of the Chi-Chi(Taiwan)earthquake in 1999. Chin J Geophys 48(1):132–147 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Xie JJ, Wen ZP, Li XJ, Li YQ, Lv HS, Huang JY (2012) Analysis of velocity pulses for near-fault strong motions from the Wenchuan earthquake based on wavelet method. Chin J Geophys 55(6):1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.06.017 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Zhang WB, Yu XW (2010) Strong ground motion simulation of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. J Earthq Eng Eng Vib 30(3):1–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar