Journal of Seismology

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1485–1498 | Cite as

The maximum expected earthquake magnitudes in different future time intervals of six seismotectonic zones of Iran and its surroundings

  • Mona Salamat
  • Gert Zöller
  • Mehdi ZareEmail author
  • Mortaza Amini


One of the crucial components in seismic hazard analysis is the estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude and associated uncertainty. In the present study, the uncertainty related to the maximum expected magnitude μ is determined in terms of confidence intervals for an imposed level of confidence. Previous work by Salamat et al. (Pure Appl Geophys 174:763-777, 2017) shows the divergence of the confidence interval of the maximum possible magnitude mmax for high levels of confidence in six seismotectonic zones of Iran. In this work, the maximum expected earthquake magnitude μ is calculated in a predefined finite time interval and imposed level of confidence. For this, we use a conceptual model based on a doubly truncated Gutenberg-Richter law for magnitudes with constant b-value and calculate the posterior distribution of μ for the time interval Tf in future. We assume a stationary Poisson process in time and a Gutenberg-Richter relation for magnitudes. The upper bound of the magnitude confidence interval is calculated for different time intervals of 30, 50, and 100 years and imposed levels of confidence α = 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01. The posterior distribution of waiting times Tf to the next earthquake with a given magnitude equal to 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 are calculated in each zone. In order to find the influence of declustering, we use the original and declustered version of the catalog. The earthquake catalog of the territory of Iran and surroundings are subdivided into six seismotectonic zones Alborz, Azerbaijan, Central Iran, Zagros, Kopet Dagh, and Makran. We assume the maximum possible magnitude mmax = 8.5 and calculate the upper bound of the confidence interval of μ in each zone. The results indicate that for short time intervals equal to 30 and 50 years and imposed levels of confidence 1 − α = 0.95 and 0.90, the probability distribution of μ is around μ = 7.16 − 8.23 in all seismic zones.


Maximum expected earthquake magnitude Future time interval Level of confidence Iran 



We thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that helped enhance the manuscript. GZ acknowledges support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1294). MS and MZ are grateful to the International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology of Iran (IIEES).


  1. Ambraseys NN, Melville CP (1982) A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Berberian M (1994) Natural hazards and the first earthquake catalogue of Iran. Vol. 1: Historical hazards in Iran prior to 1900. A UNESCO/IIEES Publication during UN/IDNDR: International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, TehranGoogle Scholar
  3. Berberian M, Yeats RS (1999) Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian plateau. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(1):120–139Google Scholar
  4. Campbell KW (1982) Bayesian analysis of extreme earthquake occurrences. Part I Probabilistic hazard model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72(5):1689–1705Google Scholar
  5. Gardner J, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367Google Scholar
  6. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145Google Scholar
  7. Hessami K, Jamali F (2006) Explanatory notes to the map of major active faults of Iran. J Seismol Earthq Eng JSEE 8(1):1–11Google Scholar
  8. Holschneider M, Zöller G, Hainzl S (2011) Estimation of the maximum possible magnitude in the framework of a doubly truncated Gutenberg–Richter model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1649–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IGUT (2015) The Iranian seismological center. University of Tehran, Iran. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  10. IIEES (2015) International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran. Iran. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  11. ISC (2015a) International seismological center. EHB bulletin, Thatcham, UK. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  12. ISC (2015b) International seismological center, online bulletin. Thatcham, UK. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  13. Jackson J, McKenzie D (1988) The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensor, and the rates of active deformation in Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophys J 93:45–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kagan YY, Jackson DD (2013) Tohoku earthquake: a surprise? Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2B):1181–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kagan YY, Schoenberg F (2001) Estimation of the upper cutoff parameter for the tapered Pareto distribution. J Appl Probab 38:158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82(20):2981–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17(3):897–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasahara K (1981) Earthquake mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Kijko A (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, Mmax. Pure Appl Geophys 161(8):1655–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kijko A, Singh M (2011) Statistical tools for maximum possible earthquake magnitude estimation. Acta Geophys 59(4):674–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirzaei N, Mengtan G, Yuntai C (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. J Earthq Prediction Res 7:465–495Google Scholar
  22. Mousavi Bafrouei SH, Mirzaei N, Shabani E (2015) A declustered earthquake catalog for the Iranian Plateau. Ann Geophys 57(6)Google Scholar
  23. NEIC (2015) National earthquake information center bulletin. US Geological Survey, CO, USA. Accessed 15 Dec 2015
  24. Niazi M, Basford JR (1968) Seismicity of Iranian plateau and Hindu Kush region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(1):417–426Google Scholar
  25. Nowroozi AA (1971) Seismo-tectonics of the Persian plateau, eastern Turkey, Caucasus, and Hindu-Kush regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61(2):317–341Google Scholar
  26. Nowroozi AA (1976) Seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66(4):1249–1276Google Scholar
  27. Olver FW (2010) NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM. Cambridge University press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Pisarenko VF (1991) Statistical evaluation of maximum possible earthquakes, Izvestiya Phys. Solid Earth 27:757–763Google Scholar
  29. Pisarenko VF, Lysenko VB (1997) Probability distribution of the maximal earthquake in a given time interval. Izv-Phys Solid Earth 33(6):438–446Google Scholar
  30. Pisarenko VF, Rodkin MV (2009) The instability of the Mmax parameter and an alternative to its using. Izv-Phys Solid Earth 45(12):1081–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pisarenko V, Lyubushin A, Lysenko V, Golubeva T (1996) Statistical estimation of seismic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(3):691–700Google Scholar
  32. Pisarenko VF, Sornette A, Sornette D, Rodkin MV (2008) New approach to the characterization of Mmax and of the tail of the distribution of earthquake magnitudes. Pure Appl Geophys 165:847–888. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salamat M, Zare M, Holschneider M, Zöller G (2017) Calculation of confidence intervals for the maximum magnitude of earthquakes in different seismotectonic zones of Iran. Pure Appl Geophys 174(3):763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shahvar MP, Zare M, Castellaro S (2013) A unified seismic catalog for the Iranian plateau (1900–2011). Seismol Res Lett 84(2):233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shoja Taheri J, Niazi M (1981) Seismicity of the Iranian plateau and bordering regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(2):477–489Google Scholar
  36. Tavakoli B, Ghafory Ashtiany M (1999) Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. Ann Geophys 42(6)Google Scholar
  37. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1991) Free software helps map and display data. EOS 72:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson AT (1930) Earthquakes in Persia. B Sch Orient Afr St 6(01):103–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zöller G (2013) Convergence of the frequency-magnitude distribution of global earthquakes: maybe in 200 years. Geophys Res Lett 40(15):3873–3877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zöller G, Holschneider M, Hainzl S (2013) The maximum earthquake magnitude in a time horizon: theory and case studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103(2A):860–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zöller G, Holschneider M, Hainzl S, Zhuang J (2014) The largest expected earthquake magnitudes in Japan: the statistical perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(2):769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zöller G, Ullah S, Bindi D, Palorai S, Mikhailova N (2015) The largest expected earthquake magnitude in Central Asia: statistical inference from an earthquake catalog with uncertain magnitude. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 432:432–433Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mona Salamat
    • 1
  • Gert Zöller
    • 2
  • Mehdi Zare
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mortaza Amini
    • 3
  1. 1.International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)TehranIran
  2. 2.Institute of MathematicsUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer ScienceUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations