Coping Through Religiosity, Spirituality and Social Support Among Muslim Chronic Hepatitis Patients
Academics acknowledge religiosity, spirituality and social support as socio-behavioral factors that influence patients’ ability to deal with chronic illness. This study has attempted to describe empirical reality of how these factors influence patients. The sample of this study was 500 chronically ill hepatitis patients and was selected through the multistage sampling techniques. Through structured interview schedule, data were collected during the period of September 2016 to March 2017 from five most populated cities of Punjab (Pakistan). Data were analyzed through descriptive (frequency and percentage) and inferential statistics (Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson correlation, and structural equation modeling). The study suggests some recommendations and suggestions to policy makers regarding the significance of religiosity, spirituality and social support as coping strategies during chronic illness. The findings illustrate that social support has more association with coping than religiosity and spirituality of the patients.
KeywordsReligiosity Spirituality Social support Chronic hepatitis Muslim patients
There is no any funding for this research.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
We declared that they have no conflict of interest regarding this study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee. This study was approved by Board of studies in University of Sargodha.
- Ariadi, S., Saud, M., & Ashfaq, A. (2018). Exploring the role of NGOs’ Health Programs in Promoting Sustainable Development in Pakistan. https://download.atlantispress.com/article/25904562.pdf.
- Borgmann, L. S., Rattay, P., & Lampert, T. (2017). Social support as a health resource in Germany. Journal of Health Monitoring, 2(4), 110–115.Google Scholar
- Dehdari, T., Heidarnia, A., Ramezankhani, A., Sadeghian, S. A., & Ghofranipour, F. (2008). Anxiety, self efficacy expectation and social support in patients after coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 37(4), 119–125.Google Scholar
- Dowsett, L. E., Coward, S., Lorenzetti, D. L., MacKean, G., & Clement, F. (2017). Living with hepatitis C virus: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative literature. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2017, 3268650. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3268650
- Ellison, C., Hummer, R., Burdette, A., & Benjamins, M. (2010). Race, religious involvement and health. Religion, Families and Health, 31, 321–348.Google Scholar
- Ferrell, B. R., Smith, S. L., Juarez, G., & Melancon, C. (2003). Meaning of illness and spirituality in ovarian cancer survivors. In Oncology Nursing Forum (Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 249–257).Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social Research, 1, 653–678.Google Scholar
- Minnebo, L., Velde, K. V., Delabastita, P., inventors; Agfa-Gevaert NV, assignee. (2005). Sub-dot phase modulation for computer to plate inkjet system. United States patent US 6,962,400.Google Scholar
- Omland, T., Pfeffer, M. A., Solomon, S. D., de Lemos, J. A., Røsjø, H., Benth, J. Š., et al. (2013). Prognostic value of cardiac troponin I measured with a highly sensitive assay in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61(12), 1240–1249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’neill, D. P., & Kenny, E. K. (1998). Spirituality and chronic illness. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30(3), 275–280.Google Scholar
- Pérez, R. C. (2005). Perspectivas constructivistas: La intersección entre el significado, la interacción y eldiscurso. Graó.Google Scholar
- Schaper, D. (2000). Me-First ‘Spirituality’ is a sorry substitute for organized religion on campuses. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(50), A56.Google Scholar
- Von Kodolitsch, Y., Bernhardt, A. M., Kölbel, T., Detter, C., Reichenspurner, H., & Debus, E. S. (2015). Maximizing therapeutic success: The key concepts of individualized medical strategy (IMS). Cogent Medicine, 2(1), 1109742.Google Scholar