Spiritual and Religious Issues of Stigmatization Women with Infertility: A Qualitative Study
- 20 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to determine the perceptions of women with infertility on stigma and religious and spiritual issues of stigmatization. The phenomenological method was used for the study consisting of a research sample of 12 women with infertility who were selected through the criterion sampling method. This study found that women related their experience of infertility to stress and the will of God. They were extremely sad and unhappy and went through an exhausting and fearful process. They faced social isolation, spiritual problems when their friends and relatives told other people their story of infertility.
KeywordsInfertility Religious Spiritualty Stigma Women
RHA conceived, designed and did statistical analysis and editing of manuscript and did review and final approval of manuscript. NKB did data collection and manuscript writing
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors acknowledge the contributions of all patients who took part in the study and thank the clerical staff of the clinic where these data were gathered. There is no conflict of interest between the authors.
Ethical approval was acquired from the Ethics Committee of Bozok University (number of decisions: 604-144). Written permission was obtained from the hospital where the study was conducted. “İnformed consent” was obtained from participants the after explaining the study’s aim, plan, and its expectations from the participants. Participation in the study was voluntary. We told the participants that they were free to participate or not participate, that they could withdraw from the study at any point and that they had the right to abstain from providing information. This article oral presentation 1st International East Coast Mediterranean Midwifery Congress.
- Boz, İ., & Okumuş, H. (2017). The “Everything About the Existence” experiences of turkish women with infertility: Solicited diaries in qualitative research. J Nurs Res, 25(4), 268–275.Google Scholar
- Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53.Google Scholar
- Forsythe, S. (2009). Social stigma and the medicalisation of infertility. Journal o/the Manitoba Anthropology Students’ Association, 28, 22.Google Scholar
- Hasanpoor-Azghdy, S. B., Simbar, M., & Vedadhir, A. (2014). The emotional-psychological consequences of infertility among infertile women seeking treatment: Results of a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 12(2), 131–138.Google Scholar
- Kavlak, O., & Saruhan, A. (2002). A study on determinatıon the lonelıness level ın ınfertıle women and to assess the factors that effect the lonelıness level. Ege Journal of Medicine, 41, 229–232.Google Scholar
- Kızılkaya Beji, N. (2001). Problems related to fertility and changing role of nurse. In N. Kızılkaya Beji (Ed.), Infertility problem, assisted reproductive techniques and nursing approach (pp. 103–141). Istanbul Emek Matbaacilik: İstanbul.Google Scholar
- Nazik, E. (2016). Common sexual and reproductive health problems in adult women. In A. Keser, F. Yildirim, & M. Kaplan (Eds.), Being a woman in health in disease (p. 231). Ankara: Nobel Medical Bookstores.Google Scholar
- Oti-Boadi, M., & Oppong Asante, K. (2017). Psychological health and religious coping of Ghanaian women with infertility. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 11(20), 2–7.Google Scholar
- Sezgin, H., & Hocaoğlu, Ç. (2014). Psychiatric aspects of infertility. Current Approaches in Psychiatry., 6(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
- Wu, C.-P., & Wu, C.-I. (2017). Stigma of infertility and privacy invasion in medical spaces. institute of sociology R2313. Academia Sinica, Sec. 2, Academia Rd., Nankang District, Taipei City 115, Taiwan, No.128Google Scholar
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (p. 107). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.Google Scholar
- Yılmaz, A. (2004). Women in Turkish Cultur. Millî Folklor, 16, 61.Google Scholar