Relationship Among Religious Orientation, Individual Attributes, and Presence of People in Urban Public Space
- 35 Downloads
The purpose of this paper is to study the rate of presence in an urban space and how it is related to people’s intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientations and individual attributes. For measuring religious orientation, the Allport’s Scale of intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation was used. The information was collected from 100 residents of Mashhad, an important religious city of Iran. Results show that internal and external religious orientations do not have a significant relationship with the presence of people in urban spaces. But there is a strong relationship between individual attributes (marital status, employment status, income level, and family relationships) and the presence of people in urban spaces. This research shows that designing with attention to environmental factors affecting mental states and attention to the presence of social strata with different income levels in urban spaces can have more impact on the presence of people in urban spaces.
KeywordsReligious orientation Urban public space Presence of people Individual attribute
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Arjmand, R. (2017). Public urban space, gender and segregation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Barzegar Kahnamouei, S., Bazmi, M. J., & Allahvirdiyani, Kh. (2011). Relationship of religious orientation (inward–outward) with depression, anxiety and stress. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2047–2049.Google Scholar
- Bozorgi, M. (1999). Evaluate the effectiveness of psychotherapy with or without an Islamic religious orientation anxiety and stress. Journal of Psychology, 2(4), 345–350.Google Scholar
- De, A. (2016). Spatialisation of selves: Religion and liveable spaces among Hindus, City. Culture and Society, 7, 149–154.Google Scholar
- Gehl, J. (1996). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Translate by Jo Koch. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- Gehl, J., & Litt, D. (1998). The form and use of public space. In European transport conference, Loughborough University, England, 16 sept. 1998.Google Scholar
- Ghaderi, D., & Mostafaee, A. (2014). A study on the relationship between religious orientations and quality of life among elderly men living in nursing homes and those living with their families in Tabriz. Salmand, 9(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great american cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Kargar, R., & Ghassemi, M. (2016). Urban furniture and leisure of citizens (case study of Sabzevar urban parks). Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 6(2), 40–47.Google Scholar
- Li, M. (2003). Urban regeneration through public space: A case study in squares in Dalian, China. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
- Maghelal, P. K., & Capp, C. J. (2011). Walkability: A review of existing pedestrian indices. URISA Journal, 23(2), 5–19.Google Scholar
- Palacky, J., Wittmann, M., & Frantisak, L. (2015). Evaluation of urban open spaces sustainability. In 29th annual AESOP 2015 congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 13–16, 2015.Google Scholar
- Ramlee, M., Omar, D., Yunus, R., & Samadi, Z. (2015). Revitalization of urban public spaces: An overview. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 360–367.Google Scholar
- Razavizadeh, A. S., Majedi, M., & Habib, F. (2015). Criteria and indicators of presence quality improvement in urban spaces (Case study: Historical texture of Kashan City). International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 5(3), 53–62.Google Scholar
- Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environmental scale evaluation. Public Health, 93(9), 1552–1558.Google Scholar
- Shahpasand, S., Hosseini, S. B., Yazdanfar, A., & Norouzian Maleki, S. (2016). How to increase social activities in public open spaces in residential areas: A case study. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(1), 189–196.Google Scholar
- Shortell, T., & Krase, J. (2010). Place, space, identity: A spatial semiotics of the urban vernacular in global cities, ESA Research Network Sociology of Culture Midterm Conference: Culture and the Making of Worlds, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
- Sillick, W. J., Stevens, B., & Cathcart, S. (2016). Religiosity and happiness: A comparison of the happiness levels between the religious and the nonreligious. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 4(1), 115–127.Google Scholar
- Soltanian, F., & Mohammadi, A. (2015). Study of characteristics of urban public open spaces based on social interaction (Case study: Salavatabad’s 3-kilometer route). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(3), 553–564.Google Scholar
- Yousefi, M., & Fardi, R. (2016). Physical responding of the urban public space to citizens’ rights. Social Sciences, 7(3), 167–172.Google Scholar