Advertisement

The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Attitude of Aesthetic Surgery Operation in Islam

  • Ümran MusluEmail author
  • Emre Demir
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between individuals’ attitudes about acceptance of aesthetic surgery (e.g. rhinoplasty, autoplasty, blepharoplasty, and mammaplasty) and some of the worship practices in Islamic religion such as performing prayer, fasting, and going to pilgrimage. Although many people think that aesthetic surgery is inappropriate in Islamic religion, no studies in the literature were found to have investigated this issue. This study collected data through a questionnaire administered to 96 patients who applied to our Plastic Surgery Clinic and underwent various surgical operations and 96 patients who were recommended plastic surgery but rejected to have one; the questionnaire aimed to identify the participants’ frequency of religious worship practices and appropriateness of aesthetic surgery to their beliefs. The participants responded on the frequency of religious worship levels according to the options in the questionnaire. The “Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale” was utilized in order to identify their attitudes towards aesthetic surgery. Levels of performing prayers, fasting, and going to pilgrimage in the groups that accepted surgery and in the groups that rejected surgery were significantly different (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p < 0.001). In two different groups, the Acceptance of Aesthetic Surgery Scale scores were significantly different within the prayer groups and fasting groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001). While the group that accepted surgery indicated no significant differences between those who thought about going to pilgrimage and who did not (p = 0.650), there was a significant difference in the group that rejected surgery (p < 0.001). While 14.6% of the participants in the group that accepted surgery considered aesthetic surgery a sin, this proportion was 56.3% in the group that rejected surgery, and this difference was significant (p < 0.001). In both surgery groups, there were differences in the scale scores of those who considered aesthetic surgery a sin and those who did not (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between worship practices, one of the biggest indicators of the level of belief in Islamic religion, and aesthetic surgery attitudes. However, despite the fact that belief levels affect the decision of having an operation in plastic surgery, in case of serious health problems, the decision of having an operation becomes more important religious beliefs.

Keywords

Religion Aesthetic surgery Cosmetic surgery Islam 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007). Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 40, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atiyeh, B. S., Kadry, M., Hayek, S. N., & Musharafieh, R. S. (2008). Aesthetic surgery and religion: Islamic law perspective. Aesth Plast Surg, 32, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhshaee, M., Asghari, M., Sharifian, M. R., Ashtiyani, S. J., & Rasoulian, B. (2018). Islamic attitudes and rhinoplasty. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 30(2), 91–96.Google Scholar
  4. Bompy, L., Gerenton, B., Cristofari, S., Stivala, A., Moris, V., See, L. A., et al. (2018). Impact on breastfeeding according to implant features in breast augmentation: A multicentric retrospective study. Annals of Plastic Surgery.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001651.Google Scholar
  5. Coştu, Yakup. (2009). Approach to religion by the normative and popular: “A test on the religious orientation scale”. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University, 8(15), 119–139.Google Scholar
  6. Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 43(1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 700–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fromm, Erich. (1976). To have or to be?. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image, 2, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karaca, S., Karakoç, A., Onan, N., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 8(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  11. Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 48(3), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muslu, Ü. (2018). The evolution of breast reduction publications: A bibliometric analysis. Aesth Plast Surg., 42(3), 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet, 353, 664–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sönmez, A. Ö. (2016). The religiosity scales developed on the measurability of religiosity. SEFAD, 36, 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of MedicineHitit UniversityÇorumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of MedicineHitit UniversityÇorumTurkey

Personalised recommendations