Advertisement

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Social Problem Solving Test for Adolescents

  • Khanh Nguyen CongEmail author
  • Linh Nguyen Thi My
Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the social problem solving test (SPST) using two samples of Vietnamese high school students: 247 regular students (referred to as normal students) and 168 “disruptive” students who had been diagnosed as having behavioral problems. The SPST is a performance measure of interpersonal problem-solving competence in adolescents. The SPST consists of 24 interpersonal problematic situations, set in two parts, 12 stories in SPST-A (stories-a) and 12 stories in SPST-B (stories-b). The SPST-A was structured into five subscales that were designed to assess the five components of social problem-solving competency based on the modified multi-dimensional problem-solving model. The SPST-B was divided into two scales to assess overall problem-solving abilities: problem affect-cognitions (orientation) and problem-solving actions (strategies or skills). The Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised standardized, was used to appraise the validity of the SPST-A. The preliminary data concerning the reliability and validity of these instruments were reported. The results provided evidence that the scales had acceptable internal consistency, concurrent validity and construct validity and that the SPST seem to be a promising multidimensional outcome measure of social problem-solving competence in Vietnamese adolescents.

Keywords

Problematic situation Social problem solving Adolescent interpersonal problem Interpersonal problem solving competence 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10942_2019_325_MOESM1_ESM.doc (110 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 110 kb)

References

  1. Conner, C. K. (2000). Conner’s rating scales—revised: Technical manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Craighead, W. E. (1991). Cognitive factors and classification issues in adolescent depression. Journal of Youth & Adolescents, 20, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Zurilla, T. J. (1986). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. (1971). Problem-solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 104–126.Google Scholar
  5. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1996). Manual for the social problem solving inventory-revised (SPSI-R). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar
  7. D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised (SPSI–R): Technical manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Desjardins, T. L., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2011). Relational victimisation and depressive symptoms in adolescence: Moderating effects of mother, father, and peer emotional support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 531–544.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9562-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, S., & Bussey, K. (2011). The development of the social bullying involvement scales. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frauenknecht, M., & Black, D. A. (1995). Social Problem Solving Inventory for Adolescents (SPSI-A): Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 522–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kasik, L. (2014). Development of social problem solving—A longitudinal study (2009–2011) in a Hungarian context. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 142–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kathryn, S. W. (2011). Understanding how social and emotional skill deficits contribute to school failure. Preventing School Failure, 55(1), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayr, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2000). Selecting a measure of emotional intelligence the case for ability scale. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of emotional intelligence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. McMurran, M., & McGuire, J. (2011). Social problem solving and offending evidence, evaluation and evolution. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Nguyen, C. K. (2016). Adolescents psychological counselling. University of Pedagogy Publisher. ISBN 978-604-54-2358-5.Google Scholar
  16. Nguyen, C. K. (2017). Psychotherapy. Hanoi National University Publisher. ISBN 978-604-62-9668-3.Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen, C. K., & Nguyen, T. M. L. (2017). Development of the social problem solving measure of adolescents’ competences in dealing with interpersonal problems. HNUE Journal of Science, Educational Sciences, 62(12), 12–24.Google Scholar
  18. Offrey, L., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Parent–child communication and adolescents’ problem-solving strategies in hypothetical bullying situations. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 251–267.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.884006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sadowski, C., & Kelly, M. L. (1993). Social problem solving in suicidal adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2007). Social competence in children. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Wakeling, H. (2007). The psychometric validation of the social problem-solving inventory -revised with UK incarcerated sexual offenders. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9038-3.Google Scholar
  22. Wentzel, R. R. (1991). Relation between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zsolnai, A., & Kasik, L. (2016). Coping strategies and social problem solving in adolescence. In A. Surian (Ed.), Open spaces for interactions and learning diversities. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Zsolnai, A., Kasik, L., & Braunitzer, G. (2014). Coping strategies at the ages 8, 10 and 12. Educational Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.916397.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special EducationHanoi National University of EducationHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Hanoi National University of EducationHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations