Advertisement

Referent’s Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training

  • Aleksander A. Aleksandrov
  • Kristina S. Memetova
  • Lyudmila N. Stankevich
  • Veronika M. Knyazeva
  • Yury ShtyrovEmail author
Article

Abstract

Lexical ERPs (event-related potentials) obtained in an oddball paradigm were suggested to be an index of the formation of new word representations in the brain in the learning process: with increased exposure to new lexemes, the ERP amplitude grows, which is interpreted as a signature of a new memory-trace build-up and activation. Previous learning studies using this approach have, however, mostly used meaningless novel word forms; it therefore remains uncertain whether the increased amplitude simply reflects increased familiarity with the new stimulus or is indeed a reflection of a complete word representation. Here, we used the oddball paradigm to measure the mismatch negativity (MMN) responses to novel word forms before and after semantic training, during which they were associated with previously familiar words of either high or low frequency of occurrence. Following training, the amplitude of the MMN to novel words was enhanced. Furthermore, these changes were dependent on the frequency of the reference which novel items became associated with: namely, the MMN amplitude became greater and the latency shorter for the item which was assigned the high-frequency meaning. Even though the amount of training was the same for both types of items, the low-frequency stimulus did not achieve similar significant changes. Our results suggest that the new surface form becomes linked to the existing representation, which then automatically activates in full when the respective stimulus is present at the input. This finding indicates that the learning-related MMN dynamics, manifest as a response increase after learning, likely reflects the formation and activation of a complete lexicosemantic memory circuits for words.

Keywords

Learning Plasticity Electroencephalography (EEG) Event-related potential (ERP) Mismatch negativity (MMN) Word Representation Lexical frequency Semantics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation [Grant R164-2013-15801, Project 18690], and RF Government [Grant Contract № 14.W03.31.0010].

References

  1. Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., & Stankevich, L. N. (2017a). Lexical context affects mismatch negativity caused by pseudowords. Human Physiology.,43(4), 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleksandrov, A. A., Memetova, K. S., Stankevich, L. N., & Uplisova, K. O. (2017b). Effects of Russian-language word frequency on mismatch negativity in auditory event-related potentials. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology,47(9), 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandrov, A. A., Boricheva, D. O., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments.  https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat [phonetic analysis software], vers. 5.4. 01. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat.
  6. Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Dowens, M. G., Molinaro, N., & Martin, C. (2015). The electrophysiology of the bilingual brain. In R. R. Heredia, J. Altarriba, & A. B. Cieślicka (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 265–312). Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2993-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Embick, D., Hackl, M., Schaeffer, J., Kelepir, M., & Marantz, A. (2001). A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research,10, 345–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R. (2004). Reexamining the vocabulary spurt. Developmental Psychology,40(4), 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2006). The sound of actions as reflected by mismatch negativity: Rapid activation of cortical sensory-motor networks by sounds associated with finger and tongue movements. European Journal of Neuroscience,23, 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins, E., Astle, D. E., & Rastle, K. (2015). Semantic advantage for learning new phonological form representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,27(4), 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobsen, T., Horvath, J., Schroger, E., Lattner, S., Widmann, A., & Winkler, I. (2004). Pre-attentive auditory processing of lexicality. Brain and Language,88(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobsen, T., Schroger, E., Winkler, I., & Horvath, J. (2005). Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17(11), 1704–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., Leminen, A., Vainio, M., & Shtyrov, Y. (2015). Rapid and automatic speech-specific learning mechanism in human neocortex. Neuroimage,118, 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kimppa, L., Kujala, T., & Shtyrov, Y. (2016). Individual language experience modulates rapid formation of cortical memory circuits for novel words. Scientific Reports,6, 30227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kujala, A., Huotilainen, M., Uther, M., Shtyrov, Y., Monto, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., et al. (2003). Plastic cortical changes induced by learning to communicate with non-speech sounds. NeuroReport,14, 1683–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology,62, 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology,118, 2544–2590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Näätänen, R., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature,385(6615), 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Novitskiy, N., Myachykov, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Crosslinguistic interplay between semantics and phonology in late bilinguals: Neurophysiological evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,22(2), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia,9(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Partanen, E., Leminen, A., de Paoli, S., Bundgaard, A., Kingo, O. S., Krojgaard, P., et al. (2017). Flexible, rapid and automatic neocortical word form acquisition mechanism in children as revealed by neuromagnetic brain response dynamics. Neuroimage,155, 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavlenko, A. (2000). New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  23. Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206.Google Scholar
  24. Pulvermuller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology,79, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language,110, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulvermüller, F., et al. (2001). Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage,14(3), 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shtyrov, Y. (2010). Automaticity and attentional control in spoken language processing: Neurophysiological evidence. Mental Lexicon,5, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shtyrov, Y. (2011). Fast mapping of novel word forms traced neurophysiologically. Frontiers in Psychology,2, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shtyrov, Y. (2012). Neural bases of rapid word learning. Neuroscientist,18, 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. (2014). Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,111, E1918–E1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience,19, 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shtyrov, Y., Kimppa, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Kujala, T. (2011). Event-related potentials reflecting the frequency of unattended spoken words: A neuronal index of connection strength in lexical memory circuits? Neuroimage,55, 658–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shtyrov, Y., Kirsanov, A., & Shcherbakova, O. (2019). Explicitly slow, implicitly fast, or the other way around? Brain mechanisms for word acquisition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 116.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T., Palva, S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2000). Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuroimage,12, 657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. V., & Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. Journal of Neuroscience,30, 16864–16867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Language in the mismatch negativity design: Motivations, benefits and prospects. Journal of Psychophysiology,21, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shtyrov, Y. Y., & Stroganova, T. A. (2015). When ultrarapid is ultrarapid: On importance of temporal precision in neuroscience of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 576.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00576.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Steinberg, J., Truckenbrodt, H., & Jacobsen, T. (2012). The role of stimulus cross-splicing in an event-related potentials study. Misleading formant transitions hinder automatic phonological processing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America,131(4), 3120–3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vasilyeva, M. J., Knyazeva, V. M., Aleksandrov, A. A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Neurophysiological correlates of fast mapping of novel words in the adult brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,13, 304.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Cortical motor systems are involved in second-language comprehension: Evidence from rapid mu-rhythm desynchronisation. NeuroImage,102(P2), 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksander A. Aleksandrov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kristina S. Memetova
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lyudmila N. Stankevich
    • 2
  • Veronika M. Knyazeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yury Shtyrov
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Behavioural NeurodynamicsSaint Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of Higher Nervous Activity and PsychophysiologySaint Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Kurchatov Institute - National Research CentreMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN)Aarhus University/Aarhus University HospitalAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations