Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 1133–1161 | Cite as

Processing of Translation-Ambiguous Words by Chinese–English Bilinguals in Sentence Context

  • Guowei Zhou
  • Yao Chen
  • Yin Feng
  • Rong ZhouEmail author
Article
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

Translation ambiguity, which occurs commonly when one word has more than one possible translation in another language, causes language processing disadvantage. The present study investigated how Chinese–English bilinguals process translation-ambiguous words, and whether it is affected by the second language (L2) proficiency and sentence context, through translation recognition task. Each ambiguous word was paired with dominant and subordinate translations and categorized into different types according to the semantic similarity between translations. Results revealed that translation-ambiguous words were not well-placed in comparison to unambiguous counterparts, with slower and less successful performance. Dominant translations were processed more quickly and accurately than subordinate translations. As L2 proficiency increased, the higher the semantic similarity between translations was, the quicker the processing of translation-ambiguous words was. Sentences with high semantic constraint brought about a greater effect on ambiguity resolution than those with low semantic constraint, especially for ambiguous words with less semantically similar translations. The current study not only provides an important insight into the processing mechanism of translation-ambiguous words from a new perspective of different-script languages, but also sheds some light on the understanding of sentence context effect on ambiguity resolution.

Keywords

Translation-ambiguous word L2 proficiency Sentence context Semantic similarity Translation dominance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jie Zhou and Guofang Zhang for their detailed comments and constructive feedback for this manuscript.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451–474.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(2), 186–197.Google Scholar
  3. Basnight-Brown, D. M., Kazanas, S. A., & Altarriba, J. (2018). Translation ambiguity in Mandarin–English bilinguals: Translation production differences in concrete, abstract, and emotion words. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.  https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17037.bas Google Scholar
  4. Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118(2), 245–257.Google Scholar
  5. Boada, R., Sánchez-Casas, R., Gavilán, J. M., García-Albea, J. E., & Tokowicz, N. (2013). Effect of multiple translations and cognate status on translation recognition performance of balanced bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 183–197.Google Scholar
  6. Bracken, J., Degani, T., Eddington, C., & Tokowicz, N. (2017). Translation semantic variability: How semantic relatedness affects learning of translation-ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(04), 783–794.Google Scholar
  7. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, C. X., Wang, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Acquisition of compound words in Chinese–English bilingual children: Decomposition and cross-language activation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(03), 583–600.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, A., Pannunzi, M., Deco, G., & Pickering, M. J. (2016). Do bilinguals automatically activate their native language when they are not using it. Cognitive Science, 41(6), 1629–1644.Google Scholar
  10. de Groot, A. M. B. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1001–1018.Google Scholar
  11. Degani, T., Prior, A., Eddington, C. M., da Luz, Areas, Fontes, A. B., & Tokowicz, N. (2016). Determinants of translation ambiguity: A within and cross-language comparison. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(3), 290–307.Google Scholar
  12. Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 18–28.Google Scholar
  13. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2010a). Ambiguous words are harder to learn. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 299–314.Google Scholar
  14. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2010b). Semantic ambiguity within and across languages: An integrative review. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(7), 1266–1303.Google Scholar
  15. Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2013). Cross-language influences: Translation status affects intraword sense relatedness. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 1046–1064.Google Scholar
  16. Degani, T., Tseng, A. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Together or apart: Learning of translation-ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 749–765.Google Scholar
  17. Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.Google Scholar
  18. Duyck, W., Assche, E. V., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679.Google Scholar
  19. Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2013). Examining English–German translation ambiguity using primed translation recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 442–457.Google Scholar
  20. Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2015). How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: The current state of the literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 13–37.Google Scholar
  21. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 256–283.Google Scholar
  22. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Williams, J. N. (2008). First language polysemy affects second language meaning interpretation: Evidence for activation of first language concepts during second language reading. Second Language Research, 24(2), 167–187.Google Scholar
  23. Guo, T., Misra, M., Tam, J. W., & Kroll, J. F. (2012). On the time course of accessing meaning in a second language: An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of translation recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1165–1186.Google Scholar
  24. Klepousniotou, E. (2002). The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 205–223.Google Scholar
  25. Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  26. Klepousniotou, E., Titone, D., & Romero, C. (2008). Making sense of word senses: The comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1534–1543.Google Scholar
  27. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.Google Scholar
  28. Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar
  29. Laxén, J., & Lavaur, J.-M. (2010). The role of semantics in translation recognition: Effects of number of translations, dominance of translations and semantic relatedness of multiple translations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 157–183.Google Scholar
  30. Lemhofer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343.Google Scholar
  31. Ma, F., & Ai, H. (2018). Chinese learners of English see Chinese words when reading English words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 505–521.Google Scholar
  32. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.Google Scholar
  33. Michael, E. B., Tokowicz, N., Degani, T., & Smith, C. J. (2011). Individual differences in the ability to resolve translation ambiguity across languages. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 79–97.Google Scholar
  34. Oppenheim, G., Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2018). Found in translation: Late bilinguals do automatically activate their native language when they are not using it. Cognitive Science, 42, 1700–1713.Google Scholar
  35. Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 125–160). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Prior, A., Kroll, J. F., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Translation ambiguity but not word class predicts translation performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 458–474.Google Scholar
  37. Prior, A., MacWhinney, B., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Translation norms for English and Spanish: The role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 1029–1038.Google Scholar
  38. Rodd, J. (2004). Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
  39. Rodd, J., Berriman, R., Landau, M., Lee, T., Ho, C., Gaskell, G., et al. (2012). Learning new meanings for old words: Effects of semantic relatedness. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1095–1108.Google Scholar
  40. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245–266.Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 197–212.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, G. B., & Krueger, M. A. (1991). Selective access of homograph meaning in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627–643.Google Scholar
  44. Starreveld, P. A., De Groot, A. M. B., Rossmark, B. M. M., & Van Hell, J. G. (2013). Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(02), 258–276.Google Scholar
  45. Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 12530–12535.Google Scholar
  46. Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.Google Scholar
  47. Tokowicz, N. (2014). Translation ambiguity affects language processing, learning, and representation. In R. T. Miller, K. I. Martin, C. M. Eddington, A. Henery, N. M. Miguel, A. M. Tseng, A. Tuninetti, & D. Walter (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2012 second language research forum: Building bridges between disciplines (pp. 170–180). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tokowicz, N. (2015). Word and translation pair characteristics and their impact on second language lexical processing. In N. Tokowicz (Ed.), Lexical processing and second language acquisition (pp. 75–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Tokowicz, N., & Degani, T. (2010). Translation ambiguity: Consequences for learning and processing. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 281–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  50. Tokowicz, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2007). Number of meanings and concreteness: Consequences of ambiguity within and across languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(5), 727–779.Google Scholar
  51. Tokowicz, N., Kroll, J. F., de Groot, A. M. B., & van Hell, J. G. (2002). Number-of-translation norms for Dutch–English translation pairs: A new tool for examining language production. Behavior Research Methods, 34(3), 435–451.Google Scholar
  52. Tseng, A. M., Chang, L.-Y., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Translation ambiguity between English and Mandarin Chinese: The role of proficiency and word characteristics. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The development of translation competence: Theories and methodologies from psycholinguistic and cognitive science (pp. 107–165). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 88–107.Google Scholar
  54. Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Bilingual word recognition in a sentence context. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
  55. van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 193–211.Google Scholar
  56. van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. M. (2008). Sentence context modulates visual word recognition and translation in bilinguals. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 431–451.Google Scholar
  57. van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483.Google Scholar
  58. van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190.Google Scholar
  59. Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 26(5), 979–1001.Google Scholar
  60. Wen, Y., Filik, R., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2018). Electrophysiological dynamics of Chinese phonology during visual word recognition in Chinese–English bilinguals. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6869.Google Scholar
  61. Wen, Y., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2017). Chinese translation norms for 1,429 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1006–1019.Google Scholar
  62. Wen, Y., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2018). Limitations of translation activation in masked priming: Behavioural evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals and computational modelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 101, 84–96.Google Scholar
  63. Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Chinese–English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(22), 7646–7651.Google Scholar
  64. Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2012). Unconscious translation during incidental foreign language processing. Neuroimage, 59(4), 3468–3473.Google Scholar
  65. Zempleni, M. Z., Renken, R., Hoeks, J. C., Hoogduin, J. M., & Stowe, L. A. (2007). Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 34(3), 1270–1279.Google Scholar
  66. Zhang, T., van Heuven, W. J. B., & Conklin, K. (2011). Fast automatic translation and morphological decomposition in Chinese–English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1237–1242.Google Scholar
  67. Zhou, H., Chen, B., Yang, M., & Dunlap, S. (2010). Language nonselective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2051–2066.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Foreign StudiesSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations