Advertisement

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 1051–1062 | Cite as

The Impact of the Position of Phonemes and Lexical Status on Phonological Awareness in the Diglossic Arabic Language

  • Ibrahim A. AsadiEmail author
  • Salim Abu-Rabia
Article

Abstract

This study aimed at examining the impact of phonemes and lexical status on phonological manipulation among pre-school children. Specifically, we tested the impact of phonemic positions (initial vs. final) and lexical status (shared, spoken, standard and pseudo-words) on phonemic isolation performance. Participants were 1012 children from the second year (K2) and third year (K2) in kindergarten. The results of the ANOVAs revealed significant effect of the phonemes’ position on the phonemic isolation performance whereas the performance was easier with the initial rather than the final phonemes. Also, the repeated measure analysis showed that the lexical status also impacts the phonemic isolation performance. The performance in pseudo-words was lower than all the others. However, the other clusters of real words did not differ. The results are discussed in the light of previous findings in the literature and of differences in the syllabic structures of the words that may influence phonological awareness.

Keywords

Phonological awareness Lexical status Phonemic position Syllabic structure Diglossia 

Notes

References

  1. Asadi, I. A., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). The influence of diglossia on different types of phonological abilities in Arabic. Journal of Education and Learning.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n3p45.Google Scholar
  2. Asadi, I. A., & Khateb, A. (2017). Predicting reading in vowelized and unvowelized Arabic script: An investigation of reading in first and second grades. Journal of Reading Psychology, 38(5), 486–505.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1299821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asadi, I. A., Khateb, A., Ibrahim, R., & Taha, H. (2017). How do the different cognitive and linguistic factors contribute to reading in Arabic? A large scale developmental. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(9), 1835–1867.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9755-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Content, A., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Bertelson, P. (1986). Phonetic segmentation in prereaders: Effect of corrective information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42(1), 49–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(86)90015-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Graaff, S., Hasselman, F., Bosman, A. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Cognitive and linguistic constraints on phoneme isolation in Dutch kindergartners. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 391–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 465–481.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20(3), 273–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representation, reading development and dyslexia: Toward a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6(2), 133–151.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0909(200004/06)6:2%3c133:AID-DYS160%3e3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goswami, U. (2006). Orthography, phonology, and reading development: A cross-linguistic perspective. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 463–480). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Ibrahim, R. (2011). Literacy problems in Arabic: Sensitivity to diglossia in tasks involving working memory. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(5), 571–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Metsala, J. L. (1999). Young children’s phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
  16. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 431–451.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 495–512.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints children’s ability to isolate phonemes in diglossic Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 607–625.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi, M. (2014). Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saiegh-Haddad, E., Kogan, N., & Walters, J. (2010). Universal and language-specific constraints on phonemic awareness: evidence from Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 23(3–4), 359–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9204-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(2), 279–315.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909990365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Share, D. L., & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and pre-literate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38(1), 154–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taibah, N. J., & Haynes, C. W. (2010). Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(9), 1019–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: mmediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Treiman, R. (1991). Children’s spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 346–360.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Treiman, R., Berch, D., & Weatherston, S. (1993). Children’s use of phoneme-grapheme correspondences in spelling: Roles of position and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 466–477.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Treiman, R., & Weatherston, S. (1992). Effects of linguistic structure on children’s ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing: An InterdisciplinaryJournal, 16(1), 5–20.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021789804977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 13(1), 3–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Special Education and Learning DisabilitiesThe Academic Arab College for EducationHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.The Unit for the Study of Arabic Language, Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center for the Study of Learning DisabilitiesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Special Education, Faculty of EducationUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations