A Developmental Perspective on Processing Semantic Context: Preliminary Evidence from Sentential Auditory Word Repetition in School-Aged Children
The current investigation examined the developmental changes involved in processing semantic context in auditorily presented sentences, as well as underlying attentional and suppression mechanisms. Thirty-nine typically developing school-aged children aged 6;0–14;0 years participated in the current cross-sectional sentential auditory word repetition study. Component processes involved in auditory word recognition were examined and their respective developmental trajectories systematically delineated. Experimental manipulations included semantic congruity (congruous, incongruous), sentence constraint (high, low), cloze probability (high, low), and processing mode. High sentence constraints elicited top-down pre-potency type effects, which resulted in active suppression of anticipated cloze words and longer naming latencies of perceived cloze words when violated with conflicting bottom-up information. In addition, developmental changes in component processes reflected underlying changes in attention, with evidence that suppression mechanisms remained relatively constant with age. Findings are interpreted in line with the Trace (McClelland and Elman in Cogn Psychol 18(1):1–86, 1986) model of auditory word recognition.
KeywordsAuditory word recognition Development Children Semantic context Suppression
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Professor Bruce Murdoch throughout this work. Furthermore, they would like to extend thanks to the participants and their families for their support of this project, the Gap and Kenmore State Schools for their assistance in the recruitment of participants, and Dion Scott, Peter Condie and Tom Johnsen for technical support at the University of Queensland’s School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences. Some of the data reported here previously appeared in the doctoral thesis Auditory word recognition in school-aged children with and without mild Traumatic Brain Injury by N. Mahler.
This work was supported by the Commonwealth of Australia through an Australian Postgraduate Award stipend to the lead author. There was no involvement of the funding source in any research activities.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aagedal, S. (2000). Acoustica (version 2.11 English). Norway: Acon AS. Retrieved from http://www.aconas.de.
- Brown, H., & Prescott, R. (1999). Applied linear mixed models in medicine. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Case, R. (1995). Capacity-based explanations of working memory growth: A brief history and reevaluation. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 23–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1–2), v-265.Google Scholar
- Ciechanowicz, A. (1978). Changes in the associative structure of the semantic field between ages 2 and 15. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 9(4), 215–222.Google Scholar
- Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M. (1976). The grammatical analysis of language disability: A procedure for assessment and remediation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
- Diamond, A. (2004). The development of prefrontal cortex and executive control functions: Genetic, biochemical and environmental modulation. In J. Douglas & R. Tate (Eds.), Brain impairment—A multidisciplinary journal of the Australian society for the study of brain impairment, Vol. 5. Abstracts of the 2004 meeting of the Australian Society for the study of brain impairment (ASSBI) and the international neuropsychological society (INS), p. 102. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Friederici, A. D. (2006). Event-related brain potentials as a window to children’s language processing: From syllables to sentences. Paper presented at the On-line methods in children’s language processing, New York.Google Scholar
- Hurtado, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Developmental gains in spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language. Paper presented at the On-line methods in children’s language processing, New York.Google Scholar
- Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1996). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
- Kooijman, V., Junge, C., Johnson, E. K., Hagoort, P., & Cutler, A. (2013). Predictive brain signals of linguistic development. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, ArtID 25, 4.Google Scholar
- Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
- Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 3–24). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- May, R. B., Masson, M. E. J., & Hunter, M. A. (1990). Application of statistics in behavioural research. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance: The psychology of reading (Vol. 12, pp. 3–36). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Mills, D. L., Prat, C., Zangl, R., Stager, C. L., Neville, H. J., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Language experience and the organization of brain activity to phonetically similar words: ERP evidence from 14-and 20-month-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1452–1464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375–409). Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- National Instruments Corporation. (1998). LabView™ (version 2). Austin: National Instruments Corporation.Google Scholar
- Nelson, K. (1979). Explorations in the development of a functional semantic system. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Children’s language and communication (Vol. 12, pp. 47–81). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Norussis, M. J. (1990). SPSS/PC + statistics (version 11.0). Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
- Rafal, R., & Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 1–51). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Shipley, K. G., & McAfee, J. G. (2004). Assessment in speech-language pathology. A resource manual (3rd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
- Trueswell, J. C. (2006). The use of eye movements to study the development of spoken language comprehension. Paper presented at the on-line methods in children’s language processing, New York.Google Scholar