Provider Readiness and Adaptations of Competency Drivers During Scale-Up of the Family Check-Up
- 53 Downloads
We used provider (n = 112) data that staff at the agency disseminating the Family Check-Up (FCU; REACH Institute) collected to profile provider diversity in community settings and to examine whether provider profiles are related to implementation fidelity. Prior to FCU training, REACH Institute staff administered the FCU Provider Readiness Assessment (PRA), a provider self-report measure that assesses provider characteristics previously linked with provider uptake of evidence-based interventions. We conducted a latent class analysis using PRA subscale scores as latent class indicators. Results supported four profiles: experienced high readiness (ExHR), experienced low readiness (ExLR), moderate experience (ME), and novice. The ExHR class was higher than all other classes on: (1) personality variables (i.e., agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, extraversion); (2) evidence-based practice attitudes; (3) work-related enthusiasm and engagement; and (4) their own well-being. The ExHR class was also higher than ExLR and ME classes on clinical flexibility. The ME class was lowest of all classes on conscientiousness, supervision, clinical flexibility, work-related enthusiasm and engagement, and well-being. During the FCU certification process, FCU Consultants rated providers’ fidelity to the model. Twenty-three of the 112 providers that completed the PRA also participated in certification. We conducted follow-up regression analyses using fidelity data for these 23 providers to explore associations between probability of class membership and fidelity. The likelihood of being in the ExHR class was related to higher FCU fidelity, whereas the likelihood of being in the ExLR class was related to lower fidelity. We discuss how provider readiness assessment data can be used to guide the adaptation of provider selection, training, and consultation in community settings.
KeywordsProvider profiles Implementation Readiness Adaptation Competency drivers
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Thomas Dishion is the developer of the Family Check-Up. Dr. Anne M. Mauricio is an Associate Research Professor at the Arizona State University REACH Institute, and Mrs. Letham and Lopez are staff at the REACH Institute. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Arizona State University’s IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
We obtained informed consent from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHSR.0000024351.12294.65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beidas, R. S., Edmunds, J., Ditty, M., Watkins, J., Walsh, L., Marcus, S., et al. (2014). Are inner context factors related to implementation outcomes in cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth anxiety? Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(6), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0529-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, B. K., Buti, A., Fussell, H. E., Srikanth, P., McCarty, D., & Guydish, J. R. (2013). Therapist predictors of treatment delivery fidelity in a community-based trial of 12-step facilitation. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39(5), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2013.799175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. N. (2014). Direct and indirect effects of the Family Check-Up on self-regulation from toddlerhood to early school-age. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(7), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9859-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., Connell, A., Weaver, C., Shaw, D., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. (2008). The Family Check-Up with high-risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Development, 79(5), 1395–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., Knutson, N., Brauer, L., Gill, A., & Risso, J. (2010). Family check-up: COACH ratings manual. Unpublished coding manual. Available from Child and Family Center.Google Scholar
- Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. A. (2012). Everyday parenting: A professional’s guide to building family management skills. Champaign: Research Press Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kakeeto, M., Lundmark, R., Hasson, H., & Thiele Schwarz, U. (2017). Meeting patient needs trumps adherence. A cross-sectional study of adherence and adaptations when national guidelines are used in practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(4), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klimes-Dougan, B., August, G. J., Lee, C. Y. S., Realmuto, G. M., Bloomquist, M. L., Horowitz, J. L., et al. (2009). Practitioner and site characteristics that relate to fidelity of implementation: The Early Risers prevention program in a going-to-scale intervention trial. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, C., Darnell, D., Kerns, S., Monroe-DeVita, M., Landes, S. J., Lyon, A. R., et al. (2016). Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: Advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science. Implementation Science, 11(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0428-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nelson, T. D., & Steele, R. G. (2007). Predictors of practitioner self-reported use of evidence-based practices: Practitioner training, clinical setting, and attitudes toward research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0111-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Committee on the prevention of mental disorders and substance abuse among children, youth, and young adults: Research advances and promising interventions. In Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities.Google Scholar
- Salyers, M. P., Fukui, S., Rollins, A. L., Firmin, R., Gearhart, T., Noll, J. P., et al. (2015). Burnout and self-reported quality of care in community mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0544-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2009). Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of intervention effects on early childhood problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21(2), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skriner, L. C., Wolk, C. B., Stewart, R. E., Adams, D. R., Rubin, R. M., Evans, A. C., et al. (2017). Therapist and organizational factors associated with participation in evidence-based practice initiatives in a large urban publicly-funded mental health system. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-017-9552-0.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(6), 962–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Rudo-Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Stormshak, E. A., Montag, S., Brown, K., et al. (in press). A quasi-experimental study of the effectiveness and efficiency of observationally assessing fidelity to a family-centered intervention. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.Google Scholar
- Steiger, J. (1989). Causal modeling: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: Systat.Google Scholar
- Van Ryzin, M. J., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). The impact of a family-centered intervention on the ecology of adolescent antisocial behavior: Modeling developmental sequelae and trajectories during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 24(03), 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Ryzin, M. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: Longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(6), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar